{"title":"AI and the Subjective Crisis of Knowledge","authors":"Paul Scherz, Luis Vera","doi":"10.1111/jore.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Religious ethicists have observed how the threat of AI-generated texts, images, and videos accentuates the problems of a “post-truth” world already linked to algorithms that foster misinformation and echo chambers. There is also a less discussed problem occurring in science as it becomes increasingly dependent on AI's analytic techniques, shifting toward statistical knowledge and probabilistic prediction, which is creating a reproducibility crisis. Neither experts nor laypeople can fully trust the seeming facts they confront, driving a deeper, subjective crisis of knowledge. This epistemological instability creates ethical problems, since a person's relationship to knowledge is an essential component to the constitution of subjectivity. Many philosophers and theologians have historically embraced practices of the self that can aid in the proper formation of the subject's relationship to knowledge. By turning to the practices of the self that philosophers and theologians have used to respond to prior crises of the subject, this essay suggests practices by which people might be able to restore their judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"53 2","pages":"193-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Religious ethicists have observed how the threat of AI-generated texts, images, and videos accentuates the problems of a “post-truth” world already linked to algorithms that foster misinformation and echo chambers. There is also a less discussed problem occurring in science as it becomes increasingly dependent on AI's analytic techniques, shifting toward statistical knowledge and probabilistic prediction, which is creating a reproducibility crisis. Neither experts nor laypeople can fully trust the seeming facts they confront, driving a deeper, subjective crisis of knowledge. This epistemological instability creates ethical problems, since a person's relationship to knowledge is an essential component to the constitution of subjectivity. Many philosophers and theologians have historically embraced practices of the self that can aid in the proper formation of the subject's relationship to knowledge. By turning to the practices of the self that philosophers and theologians have used to respond to prior crises of the subject, this essay suggests practices by which people might be able to restore their judgment.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.