AI and the Subjective Crisis of Knowledge

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Paul Scherz, Luis Vera
{"title":"AI and the Subjective Crisis of Knowledge","authors":"Paul Scherz,&nbsp;Luis Vera","doi":"10.1111/jore.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Religious ethicists have observed how the threat of AI-generated texts, images, and videos accentuates the problems of a “post-truth” world already linked to algorithms that foster misinformation and echo chambers. There is also a less discussed problem occurring in science as it becomes increasingly dependent on AI's analytic techniques, shifting toward statistical knowledge and probabilistic prediction, which is creating a reproducibility crisis. Neither experts nor laypeople can fully trust the seeming facts they confront, driving a deeper, subjective crisis of knowledge. This epistemological instability creates ethical problems, since a person's relationship to knowledge is an essential component to the constitution of subjectivity. Many philosophers and theologians have historically embraced practices of the self that can aid in the proper formation of the subject's relationship to knowledge. By turning to the practices of the self that philosophers and theologians have used to respond to prior crises of the subject, this essay suggests practices by which people might be able to restore their judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"53 2","pages":"193-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Religious ethicists have observed how the threat of AI-generated texts, images, and videos accentuates the problems of a “post-truth” world already linked to algorithms that foster misinformation and echo chambers. There is also a less discussed problem occurring in science as it becomes increasingly dependent on AI's analytic techniques, shifting toward statistical knowledge and probabilistic prediction, which is creating a reproducibility crisis. Neither experts nor laypeople can fully trust the seeming facts they confront, driving a deeper, subjective crisis of knowledge. This epistemological instability creates ethical problems, since a person's relationship to knowledge is an essential component to the constitution of subjectivity. Many philosophers and theologians have historically embraced practices of the self that can aid in the proper formation of the subject's relationship to knowledge. By turning to the practices of the self that philosophers and theologians have used to respond to prior crises of the subject, this essay suggests practices by which people might be able to restore their judgment.

人工智能与知识的主观危机
宗教伦理学家已经观察到,人工智能生成的文本、图像和视频的威胁如何加剧了“后真相”世界的问题,这个世界已经与助长错误信息和回音室的算法联系在一起。随着科学越来越依赖于人工智能的分析技术,转向统计知识和概率预测,科学界也出现了一个较少讨论的问题,这正在造成可重复性危机。专家和外行人都不能完全相信他们面对的表面事实,这导致了更深层次的主观知识危机。这种认识论的不稳定性产生了伦理问题,因为人与知识的关系是主体性构成的一个重要组成部分。历史上,许多哲学家和神学家都接受了自我的实践,这有助于正确形成主体与知识的关系。通过转向哲学家和神学家用来应对主体先前危机的自我实践,这篇文章提出了人们可能能够恢复判断力的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信