{"title":"Artificial General Intelligence, Moral Standing, and Attenuated Relationality: Concerns From the Perspective of Christian Theism","authors":"John Pittard","doi":"10.1111/jore.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Some argue that if we develop machines with artificial general intelligence (“AGIs”), we might not be able to determine whether these machines are unfeeling tools without moral standing or instead conscious beings deserving of moral consideration. I reflect on this possibility from the standpoint of Christian theism. I argue, first, that Christian theists should be especially uncertain about the moral standing of hypothetical AGIs. Second, the prospect of AGIs of uncertain moral standing poses risks that are unacceptable from a Christian perspective. I give special attention to a risk we face if, out of moral precaution, we operate on the assumption that AGIs are conscious and have moral standing. If this assumption is incorrect, the precautionary approach could result in a lamentable attenuation of the bonds of mutual concern that Christians view as essential to our collective flourishing.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"53 2","pages":"239-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Some argue that if we develop machines with artificial general intelligence (“AGIs”), we might not be able to determine whether these machines are unfeeling tools without moral standing or instead conscious beings deserving of moral consideration. I reflect on this possibility from the standpoint of Christian theism. I argue, first, that Christian theists should be especially uncertain about the moral standing of hypothetical AGIs. Second, the prospect of AGIs of uncertain moral standing poses risks that are unacceptable from a Christian perspective. I give special attention to a risk we face if, out of moral precaution, we operate on the assumption that AGIs are conscious and have moral standing. If this assumption is incorrect, the precautionary approach could result in a lamentable attenuation of the bonds of mutual concern that Christians view as essential to our collective flourishing.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.