Cryptic predation on coral spawn: Hidden trophic links in the dead of night

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70182
Tom Shlesinger
{"title":"Cryptic predation on coral spawn: Hidden trophic links in the dead of night","authors":"Tom Shlesinger","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Broadcast-spawning, where gametes are released into the water for external fertilization, is a widespread reproductive strategy in marine environments, particularly among invertebrates. Coral broadcast-spawning events rank among nature's most synchronized reproductive phenomena (Harrison et al., <span>1984</span>). Typically occurring annually, these well-timed events enhance fertilization success by mitigating gamete dilution and satiating predators (Babcock et al., <span>1986</span>; Harrison et al., <span>1984</span>; Shlesinger &amp; Loya, <span>1985</span>). Most corals and reef organisms spawn at night, presumably to reduce gamete predation by visually oriented predators. Consequently, most research and hypotheses regarding gamete predation have focused on conspicuous fish predation (Alino &amp; Coll, <span>1989</span>; Baird et al., <span>2001</span>; Chamberland et al., <span>2017</span>; Ip et al., <span>2023</span>; Muller &amp; Vermeij, <span>2011</span>; Pratchett et al., <span>2001</span>; Westneat &amp; Resing, <span>1988</span>), leaving the role of cryptic invertebrate consumers underexplored. Based on extensive nocturnal observations in Eilat, Gulf of Aqaba, northern Red Sea, I document previously underappreciated coral spawn predation by diverse invertebrates. These findings reveal previously overlooked trophic interactions and suggest that invertebrate predation may constitute a substantial source of gamete loss, potentially altering fertilization rates or simply reducing overall reproductive output—an increasing concern as coral populations continue to decline globally (Chamberland et al., <span>2017</span>; Hartmann et al., <span>2018</span>; Johnston et al., <span>2020</span>; Levitan et al., <span>2014</span>; Mumby et al., <span>2024</span>; Nozawa et al., <span>2015</span>; Shlesinger &amp; Loya, <span>2019b</span>; Williamson et al., <span>2023</span>). Understanding such ecological interactions and their impact on coral-reef resilience is crucial as coral reefs face increasing environmental pressures (Donovan et al., <span>2021</span>; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., <span>2017</span>; Hughes et al., <span>2017</span>; van Woesik et al., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Most reef-building corals are simultaneous hermaphrodites, functioning as both male and female and releasing eggs and sperm into the water for external fertilization (Harrison, <span>2011</span>). These gametes, however, remain viable for only a few hours, making precise timing crucial (Levitan et al., <span>2011</span>; Nozawa et al., <span>2015</span>; Oliver &amp; Babcock, <span>1992</span>). The ocean's vast dilution effect coupled with the high palatability of coral eggs exerts pressure for highly synchronized spawning—typically occurring once per species per year, at a specific month, night, and hour. Since 2015, I have conducted an extensive nocturnal survey in the northern Red Sea, documenting the reproduction, behavior, and interactions of coral-reef dwellers. Over five reproductive seasons (June–August 2015–2019), I spent ~300 nights snorkeling and freediving, often for 5–6 h per night, recording spawning events and nocturnal behaviors (Shlesinger et al., <span>2016</span>, <span>2017</span>, <span>2021</span>; Shlesinger &amp; Loya, <span>2019a</span>, <span>2019b</span>). Observations continued at a reduced frequency from 2022 to 2024. While the goal was to construct a reproductive calendar for corals and other reef inhabitants, I encountered unexpected trophic interactions, highlighting the substantial but underappreciated role of cryptic invertebrate predation on coral spawn.</p><p>To date, invertebrate predation on coral gametes has been documented only recently in the ruby brittle star (Williamson et al., <span>2023</span>), while most research attributes coral gamete consumption to fish (Figure 1A,B; Appendix S1: Figure S1A). However, my observations reveal numerous invertebrates—spanning multiple phyla—actively preying on coral spawn (Table 1, Video S1). I documented clear predation by the phyla Arthropoda (e.g., crabs; Figure 1C), Echinodermata (e.g., basket stars and brittle stars; Figure 1D, Video S1), Mollusca (e.g., worm-snails; Figure 1E; Appendix S1: Figure S1B), and Cnidaria (e.g., hydrozoans; Figure 1F) feeding on gametes from at least ten coral genera (Figure 1, Video S1, Table 1). Additionally, I observed various species from the phyla Annelida and Ctenophora, and other Echinodermata, Mollusca, and Cnidaria members interacting with gamete bundles (Appendix S1: Figure S1C–F; Video S1), suggesting possible predation. Predation often began immediately upon gamete release but sometimes even earlier. For instance, branching <i>Acropora</i> corals retain egg-sperm bundles at the polyp edge before release, during which crabs were commonly observed nibble on them, occasionally pulling bundles from polyps (e.g., from the zoanthid <i>Palythoa</i> in Figure 1C). Similarly, before sunset-spawning corals released gametes, schools of fish (e.g., sergeant majors, butterflyfish) swam frantically from one coral to another and fed directly from their surfaces, as seen elsewhere (Chamberland et al., <span>2017</span>; Muller &amp; Vermeij, <span>2011</span>), hinting at an ability to anticipate spawning events.</p><p>Other predators employed diverse, specialized mechanisms and feeding techniques, shaped by their life history, anatomy, and behavior. The sessile gastropods, worm-snails, which inhabit calcareous tubes attached to the substrate, captured coral gamete bundles in mucus nets before pulling them into their mouths (Figure 1E; Appendix S1: Figure S1B). Coral-inhabiting barnacles used their feeding limbs fans (cirri) to capture and consume gamete bundles (Figure 1G,H; Appendix S1: Figure S1D). Sometimes, the barnacles rhythmically extended and retracted their cirri to consume gamete bundles, and in other cases, they were holding their cirri extended to accumulate plenty of coral eggs. Brittle stars commonly extended their arms from hiding spots within coral colonies, waving and coiling them to capture gametes (Figure 1D), as recently reported in the Caribbean (Williamson et al., <span>2023</span>). Giant basket stars, which have become increasingly abundant in the region, positioned themselves above spawning corals, intercepting large quantities of gamete bundles (Video S1). Additional suspension- and filter-feeders occasionally captured coral gametes, including sea anemones and hydrozoans (Figure 1F), bivalves, benthic comb jellies (Appendix S1: Figure S1E), and feather stars (Appendix S1: Figure S1F). All these organisms exhibit distinct predation strategies, differing from the open-water predation of fish, which is largely limited to times of sufficient light for visual feeding.</p><p>As coral populations decline due to habitat degradation, climate change, and other stressors (Donovan et al., <span>2021</span>; Gutierrez et al., <span>2024</span>; Hughes et al., <span>2017</span>), the total volume of released gametes also decreases. If invertebrate predator populations remain stable or even increase due to shifts in reef community structure, their relative impact on fertilization success could grow disproportionately, especially if selective predation occurs (e.g., targeting gamete bundles or only eggs rather than sperm), potentially driving the sperm-to-egg ratio away from optimal levels (Nozawa et al., <span>2015</span>; Oliver &amp; Babcock, <span>1992</span>; Teo &amp; Todd, <span>2018</span>). Such dynamics may exacerbate Allee effects, with profound consequences for coral reproductive success and resilience (Chamberland et al., <span>2017</span>; Mumby et al., <span>2024</span>; Shlesinger &amp; Loya, <span>2019b</span>). The extent to which invertebrate predation reduces reproductive success remains unknown, but unlike the more conspicuous, crepuscular predation by fish, invertebrate predators remain active throughout the night. This suggests a more prolonged and pervasive predation pressure than previously assumed. Moreover, if nighttime spawning evolved primarily to evade predation, the potentially substantial nocturnal activity of cryptic invertebrate predators raises the possibility that nighttime spawning may have also evolved, at least in part, to protect delicate gametes from damaging daytime radiation (Wellington &amp; Fitt, <span>2003</span>).</p><p>The overlooked role of invertebrates as gamete consumers suggests that coral spawn is a more integral part of reef trophic networks than recognized, especially in regions where coral populations or communities spawn over extended periods (Chamberland et al., <span>2017</span>; Gouezo et al., <span>2020</span>; Jamodiong et al., <span>2018</span>; Mangubhai &amp; Harrison, <span>2008</span>; Shlesinger &amp; Loya, <span>1985</span>, <span>2019b</span>; Wild et al., <span>2004</span>). The transfer of energy and material from coral gametes to diverse reef organisms underscores unappreciated food web connections, highlighting the importance of nocturnal research in ecology. Many aspects of reef life remain hidden in darkness, and cryptic interactions such as these often go unnoticed without dedicated nocturnal studies. While fish predation on coral spawn is well recognized, invertebrate predators may also exert a substantial impact due to their sustained presence throughout the night. These observations highlight fundamental gaps in our understanding of reef dynamics. Coral reefs are intricate ecosystems, and the interactions governing their resilience remain far from fully understood.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70182","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Broadcast-spawning, where gametes are released into the water for external fertilization, is a widespread reproductive strategy in marine environments, particularly among invertebrates. Coral broadcast-spawning events rank among nature's most synchronized reproductive phenomena (Harrison et al., 1984). Typically occurring annually, these well-timed events enhance fertilization success by mitigating gamete dilution and satiating predators (Babcock et al., 1986; Harrison et al., 1984; Shlesinger & Loya, 1985). Most corals and reef organisms spawn at night, presumably to reduce gamete predation by visually oriented predators. Consequently, most research and hypotheses regarding gamete predation have focused on conspicuous fish predation (Alino & Coll, 1989; Baird et al., 2001; Chamberland et al., 2017; Ip et al., 2023; Muller & Vermeij, 2011; Pratchett et al., 2001; Westneat & Resing, 1988), leaving the role of cryptic invertebrate consumers underexplored. Based on extensive nocturnal observations in Eilat, Gulf of Aqaba, northern Red Sea, I document previously underappreciated coral spawn predation by diverse invertebrates. These findings reveal previously overlooked trophic interactions and suggest that invertebrate predation may constitute a substantial source of gamete loss, potentially altering fertilization rates or simply reducing overall reproductive output—an increasing concern as coral populations continue to decline globally (Chamberland et al., 2017; Hartmann et al., 2018; Johnston et al., 2020; Levitan et al., 2014; Mumby et al., 2024; Nozawa et al., 2015; Shlesinger & Loya, 2019b; Williamson et al., 2023). Understanding such ecological interactions and their impact on coral-reef resilience is crucial as coral reefs face increasing environmental pressures (Donovan et al., 2021; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2017; Hughes et al., 2017; van Woesik et al., 2022).

Most reef-building corals are simultaneous hermaphrodites, functioning as both male and female and releasing eggs and sperm into the water for external fertilization (Harrison, 2011). These gametes, however, remain viable for only a few hours, making precise timing crucial (Levitan et al., 2011; Nozawa et al., 2015; Oliver & Babcock, 1992). The ocean's vast dilution effect coupled with the high palatability of coral eggs exerts pressure for highly synchronized spawning—typically occurring once per species per year, at a specific month, night, and hour. Since 2015, I have conducted an extensive nocturnal survey in the northern Red Sea, documenting the reproduction, behavior, and interactions of coral-reef dwellers. Over five reproductive seasons (June–August 2015–2019), I spent ~300 nights snorkeling and freediving, often for 5–6 h per night, recording spawning events and nocturnal behaviors (Shlesinger et al., 2016, 2017, 2021; Shlesinger & Loya, 2019a, 2019b). Observations continued at a reduced frequency from 2022 to 2024. While the goal was to construct a reproductive calendar for corals and other reef inhabitants, I encountered unexpected trophic interactions, highlighting the substantial but underappreciated role of cryptic invertebrate predation on coral spawn.

To date, invertebrate predation on coral gametes has been documented only recently in the ruby brittle star (Williamson et al., 2023), while most research attributes coral gamete consumption to fish (Figure 1A,B; Appendix S1: Figure S1A). However, my observations reveal numerous invertebrates—spanning multiple phyla—actively preying on coral spawn (Table 1, Video S1). I documented clear predation by the phyla Arthropoda (e.g., crabs; Figure 1C), Echinodermata (e.g., basket stars and brittle stars; Figure 1D, Video S1), Mollusca (e.g., worm-snails; Figure 1E; Appendix S1: Figure S1B), and Cnidaria (e.g., hydrozoans; Figure 1F) feeding on gametes from at least ten coral genera (Figure 1, Video S1, Table 1). Additionally, I observed various species from the phyla Annelida and Ctenophora, and other Echinodermata, Mollusca, and Cnidaria members interacting with gamete bundles (Appendix S1: Figure S1C–F; Video S1), suggesting possible predation. Predation often began immediately upon gamete release but sometimes even earlier. For instance, branching Acropora corals retain egg-sperm bundles at the polyp edge before release, during which crabs were commonly observed nibble on them, occasionally pulling bundles from polyps (e.g., from the zoanthid Palythoa in Figure 1C). Similarly, before sunset-spawning corals released gametes, schools of fish (e.g., sergeant majors, butterflyfish) swam frantically from one coral to another and fed directly from their surfaces, as seen elsewhere (Chamberland et al., 2017; Muller & Vermeij, 2011), hinting at an ability to anticipate spawning events.

Other predators employed diverse, specialized mechanisms and feeding techniques, shaped by their life history, anatomy, and behavior. The sessile gastropods, worm-snails, which inhabit calcareous tubes attached to the substrate, captured coral gamete bundles in mucus nets before pulling them into their mouths (Figure 1E; Appendix S1: Figure S1B). Coral-inhabiting barnacles used their feeding limbs fans (cirri) to capture and consume gamete bundles (Figure 1G,H; Appendix S1: Figure S1D). Sometimes, the barnacles rhythmically extended and retracted their cirri to consume gamete bundles, and in other cases, they were holding their cirri extended to accumulate plenty of coral eggs. Brittle stars commonly extended their arms from hiding spots within coral colonies, waving and coiling them to capture gametes (Figure 1D), as recently reported in the Caribbean (Williamson et al., 2023). Giant basket stars, which have become increasingly abundant in the region, positioned themselves above spawning corals, intercepting large quantities of gamete bundles (Video S1). Additional suspension- and filter-feeders occasionally captured coral gametes, including sea anemones and hydrozoans (Figure 1F), bivalves, benthic comb jellies (Appendix S1: Figure S1E), and feather stars (Appendix S1: Figure S1F). All these organisms exhibit distinct predation strategies, differing from the open-water predation of fish, which is largely limited to times of sufficient light for visual feeding.

As coral populations decline due to habitat degradation, climate change, and other stressors (Donovan et al., 2021; Gutierrez et al., 2024; Hughes et al., 2017), the total volume of released gametes also decreases. If invertebrate predator populations remain stable or even increase due to shifts in reef community structure, their relative impact on fertilization success could grow disproportionately, especially if selective predation occurs (e.g., targeting gamete bundles or only eggs rather than sperm), potentially driving the sperm-to-egg ratio away from optimal levels (Nozawa et al., 2015; Oliver & Babcock, 1992; Teo & Todd, 2018). Such dynamics may exacerbate Allee effects, with profound consequences for coral reproductive success and resilience (Chamberland et al., 2017; Mumby et al., 2024; Shlesinger & Loya, 2019b). The extent to which invertebrate predation reduces reproductive success remains unknown, but unlike the more conspicuous, crepuscular predation by fish, invertebrate predators remain active throughout the night. This suggests a more prolonged and pervasive predation pressure than previously assumed. Moreover, if nighttime spawning evolved primarily to evade predation, the potentially substantial nocturnal activity of cryptic invertebrate predators raises the possibility that nighttime spawning may have also evolved, at least in part, to protect delicate gametes from damaging daytime radiation (Wellington & Fitt, 2003).

The overlooked role of invertebrates as gamete consumers suggests that coral spawn is a more integral part of reef trophic networks than recognized, especially in regions where coral populations or communities spawn over extended periods (Chamberland et al., 2017; Gouezo et al., 2020; Jamodiong et al., 2018; Mangubhai & Harrison, 2008; Shlesinger & Loya, 1985, 2019b; Wild et al., 2004). The transfer of energy and material from coral gametes to diverse reef organisms underscores unappreciated food web connections, highlighting the importance of nocturnal research in ecology. Many aspects of reef life remain hidden in darkness, and cryptic interactions such as these often go unnoticed without dedicated nocturnal studies. While fish predation on coral spawn is well recognized, invertebrate predators may also exert a substantial impact due to their sustained presence throughout the night. These observations highlight fundamental gaps in our understanding of reef dynamics. Coral reefs are intricate ecosystems, and the interactions governing their resilience remain far from fully understood.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

暗地捕食珊瑚卵:夜深人静时隐藏的营养环节
在海洋环境中,特别是无脊椎动物中,将配子释放到水中进行外部受精是一种普遍的生殖策略。珊瑚广播产卵事件是自然界最同步的繁殖现象之一(Harrison et al., 1984)。通常每年发生一次,这些适时的事件通过减轻配子稀释和满足捕食者来提高受精成功率(Babcock等人,1986;Harrison等人,1984;Shlesinger和Loya, 1985)。大多数珊瑚和珊瑚礁生物在夜间产卵,大概是为了减少视觉导向的捕食者对配子的捕食。因此,大多数关于配子捕食的研究和假设都集中在显眼的鱼类捕食上(Alino & Coll, 1989; Baird等人,2001;Chamberland等人,2017;Ip等人,2023;Muller & Vermeij, 2011; Pratchett等人,2001;Westneat & Resing, 1988),没有对隐性无脊椎动物捕食者的作用进行充分的探索。根据在红海北部亚喀巴湾埃拉特的大量夜间观察,我记录了以前被低估的各种无脊椎动物捕食珊瑚产卵的情况。这些发现揭示了以前被忽视的营养相互作用,并表明无脊椎动物捕食可能是配子丢失的重要来源,可能会改变受精率或简单地减少总体生殖产出——随着珊瑚种群在全球范围内的持续下降,这一问题日益受到关注(Chamberland等人,2017;Hartmann等人,2018;Johnston等人,2020;Levitan等人,2014;Mumby等人,2024;Nozawa等人,2015;Shlesinger等人;Loya, 2019b;Williamson et al., 2023)。了解这种生态相互作用及其对珊瑚礁恢复力的影响至关重要,因为珊瑚礁面临着越来越大的环境压力(Donovan等人,2021;Hoegh-Guldberg等人,2017;Hughes等人,2017;van Woesik等人,2022)。大多数造礁珊瑚同时是雌雄同体,同时具有雄性和雌性的功能,并将卵子和精子释放到水中进行外部受精(Harrison, 2011)。然而,这些配子只能存活几个小时,因此精确的时间至关重要(Levitan et al., 2011; Nozawa et al., 2015; Oliver & Babcock, 1992)。海洋的巨大稀释效应,加上珊瑚卵的高适口性,对高度同步的产卵施加了压力——通常每个物种每年在特定的月份、夜晚和时间产卵一次。自2015年以来,我在红海北部进行了一次广泛的夜间调查,记录了珊瑚礁居民的繁殖、行为和相互作用。在五个繁殖季节(2015年6月- 2019年8月),我花了大约300个晚上浮潜和自由潜水,通常每晚5-6小时,记录产卵事件和夜间行为(Shlesinger et al., 2016, 2017, 2021; Shlesinger & Loya, 2019a, 2019b)。从2022年到2024年,观测频率有所降低。虽然我的目标是为珊瑚和其他珊瑚礁居民建立一个繁殖日历,但我遇到了意想不到的营养相互作用,突出了隐秘的无脊椎动物捕食珊瑚产卵的重要但未被重视的作用。迄今为止,无脊椎动物对珊瑚配子的捕食直到最近才在红宝石海蛇尾中被记录下来(Williamson et al., 2023),而大多数研究将珊瑚配子的消耗归因于鱼类(图1A,B;附录S1:图S1A)。然而,我的观察显示,许多无脊椎动物-跨越多个门-积极捕食珊瑚卵(表1,视频S1)。我清楚地记录了节肢动物门(如螃蟹,图1C)、棘皮动物门(如篮子星和蛇尾星,图1D,视频S1)、软体动物门(如蠕虫-蜗牛,图1E;附录S1:图S1B)和刺胞动物门(如水螅动物,图1F)捕食至少十个珊瑚属的配子(图1,视频S1,表1)。此外,我观察到来自环节动物门和栉虫门的各种物种,以及其他棘皮动物、软体动物和刺胞动物的成员与配子束相互作用(附录S1:图S1C-F;视频S1),表明可能存在捕食行为。捕食通常在配子释放后立即开始,但有时甚至更早。例如,分叉的Acropora珊瑚在释放之前在水螅体边缘保留了卵精束,在此期间,螃蟹通常会啃食它们,偶尔会从水螅体上拉出卵精束(例如图1C中的斑纹珊瑚)。同样,在日落产卵的珊瑚释放配子之前,鱼群(如军士长、蝴蝶鱼)疯狂地从一个珊瑚游到另一个珊瑚,并直接从它们的表面取食,就像在其他地方看到的那样(Chamberland et al., 2017; Muller & Vermeij, 2011),暗示有能力预测产卵事件。其他掠食者采用了多种多样的、专门的机制和捕食技术,这些都是由它们的生活史、解剖结构和行为决定的。 无根腹足动物,蠕虫-蜗牛,栖息在附着在基质上的钙质管中,在将珊瑚配子束拉入嘴里之前,它们在粘液网中捕获了珊瑚配子束(图1E;附录S1;图S1B)。生活在珊瑚中的藤壶用它们的进食肢扇形(cirri)捕获并消耗配子束(图1G,H;附录S1:图S1D)。有时,藤壶有节奏地伸展和收缩它们的卷皮以消耗配子束,在其他情况下,它们握住它们的卷皮以积累大量的珊瑚卵。海蛇尾通常会从珊瑚群落的隐藏点伸出它们的手臂,挥舞和缠绕它们来捕获配子(图1D),最近在加勒比海报道过(Williamson et al., 2023)。巨大的篮状星在该地区越来越多,它们位于产卵的珊瑚上方,拦截了大量的配子束(视频S1)。其他的悬浮物和滤食性动物偶尔会捕获珊瑚配子,包括海葵和水生动物(图1F)、双壳类动物、底栖栉水母(附录S1:图S1E)和羽毛星(附录S1:图S1F)。所有这些生物都表现出不同的捕食策略,与鱼类的开放水域捕食不同,鱼类在很大程度上受限于充足的光线来进行视觉捕食。由于栖息地退化、气候变化和其他压力因素,珊瑚种群数量减少(Donovan et al., 2021; Gutierrez et al., 2024; Hughes et al., 2017),释放配子的总量也减少。如果无脊椎捕食者种群数量由于珊瑚礁群落结构的变化而保持稳定甚至增加,它们对受精成功的相对影响可能会不成比例地增长,特别是如果发生选择性捕食(例如,针对配子束或仅针对卵子而不是精子),可能会导致精子与卵子的比例偏离最佳水平(Nozawa等人,2015;Oliver & Babcock, 1992; Teo & Todd, 2018)。这种动态可能会加剧Allee效应,对珊瑚的繁殖成功和恢复能力产生深远影响(Chamberland等人,2017;Mumby等人,2024;Shlesinger & Loya, 2019b)。无脊椎动物的捕食在多大程度上降低了繁殖成功率尚不清楚,但与鱼类更明显的黄昏捕食不同,无脊椎动物的捕食者在整个晚上都很活跃。这表明它们面临的捕食压力比之前假设的更持久、更普遍。此外,如果夜间产卵的进化主要是为了躲避捕食者,那么隐秘的无脊椎捕食者潜在的大量夜间活动提出了夜间产卵也可能进化的可能性,至少部分是为了保护脆弱的配子免受日间辐射的伤害(Wellington & Fitt, 2003)。无脊椎动物作为配子消费者的作用被忽视了,这表明珊瑚产卵是珊瑚礁营养网络的一个更重要的组成部分,尤其是在珊瑚种群或群落长时间产卵的地区(Chamberland等人,2017;Gouezo等人,2020;Jamodiong等人,2018;Mangubhai等人,Harrison, 2008; Shlesinger等人,Loya, 1985, 2019b; Wild等人,2004)。能量和物质从珊瑚配子到各种珊瑚礁生物的转移强调了未被重视的食物网联系,突出了生态学中夜间研究的重要性。珊瑚礁生物的许多方面都隐藏在黑暗中,如果没有专门的夜间研究,这些神秘的相互作用往往会被忽视。虽然鱼类捕食珊瑚卵是众所周知的,但无脊椎动物捕食者也可能产生重大影响,因为它们在夜间持续存在。这些观察结果突出了我们对珊瑚礁动力学理解的根本差距。珊瑚礁是复杂的生态系统,控制其恢复力的相互作用仍远未完全了解。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信