Mayank P. Muthyala;Claire Lauer;Stephen Carradini;Briana Rajan
{"title":"Demystifying Chatbot Creation: A Comparative Case Study of Available Approaches","authors":"Mayank P. Muthyala;Claire Lauer;Stephen Carradini;Briana Rajan","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2025.3587826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<bold><i>Background:</i></b> Chatbots are generative artificial-intelligence (GenAI) technologies that can deliver information through a conversational interface. This ability is promising to the work of technical and professional communicators (TPCers) who are often tasked with communicating complex information that is accessible and engaging, particularly in public engagement and outreach efforts. This study focuses on demystifying the chatbot creation process to inform future applications of chatbots and GenAI in technical and professional communication (TPC). <bold><i>Literature review:</i></b> Research in TPC and associated disciplines has outlined the utility and use cases for chatbots. Specifically, research has focused on how chatbots can intervene in affecting people’s perceptions of global narratives and avoiding Western science bias. Although understanding utility is important, there is an underdeveloped understanding of the affordances and limitations of the emergent technologies that TPCers can utilize to build chatbots. <bold><i>Research question:</i></b> What are the affordances and limitations of different chatbot technologies? <bold><i>Methods:</i></b> This study reports the experiences of replicating a chatbot on three platforms. First, we built the Arizona Water Chatbot—a custom-built chatbot we coded using the GPT-3.5 Turbo model. Then, we replicated the chatbot using OpenAI’s custom GPT interface and OpenAI’s Assistants API platform. Once built, we compared the development experience as it relates to each technology’s affordances and limitations; namely, we compared the setup experience, customization options, training process, prompt engineering capacity, file management ability, cost, and output quality. <bold><i>Results:</i></b> The three chatbots had varying affordances. For instance, the custom-built bot allowed extensive control over data integration and response customization, making them ideal for projects requiring highly accurate and context-sensitive information. In contrast, the chatbots that created on Open AI’s platforms were more cost-effective, faster to implement, and suitable for projects needing rapid deployment. <bold><i>Conclusion:</i></b> By describing the affordances and limitations of the chatbot technologies, this article offers academics and practitioners insight into which technology to use given their individual development goals and intended audiences.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"68 3","pages":"284-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11125865/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chatbots are generative artificial-intelligence (GenAI) technologies that can deliver information through a conversational interface. This ability is promising to the work of technical and professional communicators (TPCers) who are often tasked with communicating complex information that is accessible and engaging, particularly in public engagement and outreach efforts. This study focuses on demystifying the chatbot creation process to inform future applications of chatbots and GenAI in technical and professional communication (TPC). Literature review: Research in TPC and associated disciplines has outlined the utility and use cases for chatbots. Specifically, research has focused on how chatbots can intervene in affecting people’s perceptions of global narratives and avoiding Western science bias. Although understanding utility is important, there is an underdeveloped understanding of the affordances and limitations of the emergent technologies that TPCers can utilize to build chatbots. Research question: What are the affordances and limitations of different chatbot technologies? Methods: This study reports the experiences of replicating a chatbot on three platforms. First, we built the Arizona Water Chatbot—a custom-built chatbot we coded using the GPT-3.5 Turbo model. Then, we replicated the chatbot using OpenAI’s custom GPT interface and OpenAI’s Assistants API platform. Once built, we compared the development experience as it relates to each technology’s affordances and limitations; namely, we compared the setup experience, customization options, training process, prompt engineering capacity, file management ability, cost, and output quality. Results: The three chatbots had varying affordances. For instance, the custom-built bot allowed extensive control over data integration and response customization, making them ideal for projects requiring highly accurate and context-sensitive information. In contrast, the chatbots that created on Open AI’s platforms were more cost-effective, faster to implement, and suitable for projects needing rapid deployment. Conclusion: By describing the affordances and limitations of the chatbot technologies, this article offers academics and practitioners insight into which technology to use given their individual development goals and intended audiences.
背景:聊天机器人是一种生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术,可以通过对话界面传递信息。这种能力对技术和专业传播者(TPCers)的工作很有希望,他们经常负责传播可获取和引人入胜的复杂信息,特别是在公众参与和外展工作中。本研究的重点是揭开聊天机器人创建过程的神秘面纱,为聊天机器人和GenAI在技术和专业通信(TPC)中的未来应用提供信息。文献综述:TPC和相关学科的研究概述了聊天机器人的效用和用例。具体来说,研究集中在聊天机器人如何干预影响人们对全球叙事的看法,以及如何避免西方科学偏见。尽管理解效用很重要,但对于TPCers可以用来构建聊天机器人的新兴技术的支持和限制,人们的理解还不够充分。研究问题:不同聊天机器人技术的优点和局限性是什么?方法:本研究报告了在三个平台上复制聊天机器人的经验。首先,我们构建了Arizona Water chatbot——一个使用GPT-3.5 Turbo模型进行编码的定制聊天机器人。然后,我们使用OpenAI的自定义GPT接口和OpenAI的助手API平台复制聊天机器人。一旦构建完成,我们就会比较开发经验,因为它与每种技术的能力和局限性有关;也就是说,我们比较了安装经验、定制选项、培训过程、提示工程能力、文件管理能力、成本和输出质量。结果:三种聊天机器人具有不同的可视性。例如,定制构建的bot允许对数据集成和响应定制进行广泛的控制,使其成为需要高度准确和上下文敏感信息的项目的理想选择。相比之下,在Open AI平台上创建的聊天机器人更具成本效益,实施速度更快,适合需要快速部署的项目。结论:通过描述聊天机器人技术的优点和局限性,本文为学者和实践者提供了根据其个人开发目标和目标受众使用哪种技术的见解。
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.