Order Subcontracting Versus Platform Employment in Blockchain-Enabled Agricultural Supply Chains

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Wenlong Wang;Zihao Wang;Jiamin Wei;Ashkan Hafezalkotob;Sobhan Arisian
{"title":"Order Subcontracting Versus Platform Employment in Blockchain-Enabled Agricultural Supply Chains","authors":"Wenlong Wang;Zihao Wang;Jiamin Wei;Ashkan Hafezalkotob;Sobhan Arisian","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3594336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we present a novel cooperative model to address challenges in platform-enabled supply chains (PSCs) involving heterogeneous smallholder farmers. We examine a blockchain-based platform framework under two cooperation models: order subcontracting and platform employment. By analyzing order allocation and pricing decisions under symmetric and asymmetric information scenarios, we incorporate farmer heterogeneity to identify optimal cooperation models. Our findings show that while retail prices and order assignments remain consistent across both models, land transfer prices are significantly higher under order subcontracting. Neither farmers nor platforms consistently hold profitability advantages in PSCs. The choice of cooperation model is influenced by key factors (i.e., profit allocation and annual employment costs), especially under complete information. In addition, farmer profits are primarily driven by order quantity, with production costs closely tied to per-period yields. This study contributes to the literature by introducing a novel PSC framework that integrates blockchain technology and explicitly incorporates farmer heterogeneity. It also reveals how information asymmetry shapes cooperation outcomes in two distinct production–sales models, offering critical insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to develop equitable and efficient agricultural supply chains.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"3499-3517"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11105464/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we present a novel cooperative model to address challenges in platform-enabled supply chains (PSCs) involving heterogeneous smallholder farmers. We examine a blockchain-based platform framework under two cooperation models: order subcontracting and platform employment. By analyzing order allocation and pricing decisions under symmetric and asymmetric information scenarios, we incorporate farmer heterogeneity to identify optimal cooperation models. Our findings show that while retail prices and order assignments remain consistent across both models, land transfer prices are significantly higher under order subcontracting. Neither farmers nor platforms consistently hold profitability advantages in PSCs. The choice of cooperation model is influenced by key factors (i.e., profit allocation and annual employment costs), especially under complete information. In addition, farmer profits are primarily driven by order quantity, with production costs closely tied to per-period yields. This study contributes to the literature by introducing a novel PSC framework that integrates blockchain technology and explicitly incorporates farmer heterogeneity. It also reveals how information asymmetry shapes cooperation outcomes in two distinct production–sales models, offering critical insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to develop equitable and efficient agricultural supply chains.
订单分包与区块链农业供应链中的平台就业
在本文中,我们提出了一种新的合作模式,以解决涉及异构小农的平台支持供应链(PSCs)中的挑战。我们在两种合作模式下研究了基于区块链的平台框架:订单分包和平台雇佣。通过分析信息对称和信息不对称两种情况下的订单分配和价格决策,考虑农户的异质性,确定最优合作模型。我们的研究结果表明,虽然零售价格和订单分配在两种模式中保持一致,但订单分包下的土地转让价格明显更高。农民和平台在私人服务公司中都没有一贯的盈利优势。合作模式的选择受到关键因素(即利润分配和年雇佣成本)的影响,尤其是在完全信息条件下。此外,农民的利润主要由订单数量驱动,生产成本与每期产量密切相关。本研究通过引入一种新的PSC框架对文献做出贡献,该框架集成了区块链技术并明确纳入了农民异质性。它还揭示了信息不对称如何在两种不同的生产-销售模式中塑造合作结果,为旨在发展公平高效的农业供应链的研究人员和实践者提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信