Applying inherent requirements to foster resilience, fitness to practice, and inclusivity in medical radiation science education: A qualitative study

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
J.L. Ago , A. Kilgour , C.L. Smith , N. Pollard
{"title":"Applying inherent requirements to foster resilience, fitness to practice, and inclusivity in medical radiation science education: A qualitative study","authors":"J.L. Ago ,&nbsp;A. Kilgour ,&nbsp;C.L. Smith ,&nbsp;N. Pollard","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Inherent requirements (IRs) are essential personal attributes that demonstrate one's capacity to develop required professional capabilities in health professions education. While these attributes are theoretically positioned to support students' coping and resilience following challenging clinical interactions (CCIs), their practical application remains underexplored. This study examines how medical radiation-specific IRs are currently implemented and explores strategies to enhance their utility as academic and clinical support tools for developing student resilience.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A qualitative, exploratory descriptive design was employed. Seven MR academics from accredited Australian undergraduate medical radiation programs were recruited using snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams™ and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three themes described the current state of MR-specific IRs: (i) availability of, and student engagement with, IRs, (ii) IRs as informative yet non-enforceable guidelines, and (iii) how professional regulations are shaping MR-specific IRs. Strategies to enhance the application of IRs included creating awareness, making appropriate reasonable adjustments (RAs), and policy adjustments at the university level. IRs were found to contribute to coping and resilience by fostering self-awareness and aligning with professional capability standards. However, challenges remain in ensuring students engage with IRs meaningfully and that RAs do not compromise students’ fitness to practise.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although IRs are theoretically valuable, their current non-enforceable nature and inconsistent application limit their potential impact. Aligning IRs with professional capability standards can strengthen their utility while maintaining inclusivity and legal compliance.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Universities should improve communication around IRs and RAs by integrating them into MR curricula and admissions processes. Clear alignment with professional standards, supported by stakeholder consultation, can enable students to make informed decisions, enhance resilience, and reduce reality shocks during clinical placements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 6","pages":"Article 103145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425002895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Inherent requirements (IRs) are essential personal attributes that demonstrate one's capacity to develop required professional capabilities in health professions education. While these attributes are theoretically positioned to support students' coping and resilience following challenging clinical interactions (CCIs), their practical application remains underexplored. This study examines how medical radiation-specific IRs are currently implemented and explores strategies to enhance their utility as academic and clinical support tools for developing student resilience.

Method

A qualitative, exploratory descriptive design was employed. Seven MR academics from accredited Australian undergraduate medical radiation programs were recruited using snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams™ and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Three themes described the current state of MR-specific IRs: (i) availability of, and student engagement with, IRs, (ii) IRs as informative yet non-enforceable guidelines, and (iii) how professional regulations are shaping MR-specific IRs. Strategies to enhance the application of IRs included creating awareness, making appropriate reasonable adjustments (RAs), and policy adjustments at the university level. IRs were found to contribute to coping and resilience by fostering self-awareness and aligning with professional capability standards. However, challenges remain in ensuring students engage with IRs meaningfully and that RAs do not compromise students’ fitness to practise.

Conclusion

Although IRs are theoretically valuable, their current non-enforceable nature and inconsistent application limit their potential impact. Aligning IRs with professional capability standards can strengthen their utility while maintaining inclusivity and legal compliance.

Implications for practice

Universities should improve communication around IRs and RAs by integrating them into MR curricula and admissions processes. Clear alignment with professional standards, supported by stakeholder consultation, can enable students to make informed decisions, enhance resilience, and reduce reality shocks during clinical placements.
应用内在要求促进医疗放射科学教育的弹性、适应性和包容性:一项定性研究
内在要求(IRs)是基本的个人属性,表明一个人有能力在卫生专业教育中发展所需的专业能力。虽然这些属性在理论上被定位为支持学生在具有挑战性的临床相互作用(CCIs)后的应对和恢复能力,但它们的实际应用仍未得到充分探索。本研究考察了目前如何实施医疗辐射特异性ir,并探讨了提高其作为学术和临床支持工具的效用的策略,以培养学生的适应能力。方法采用定性、探索性描述性设计。采用滚雪球抽样的方法招募了来自澳大利亚认可的本科医学放射专业的七名MR学者。通过Microsoft Teams™进行半结构化访谈,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。三个主题描述了核磁共振特异性IRs的现状:(i) IRs的可用性和学生参与,(ii) IRs作为信息丰富但不可执行的指导方针,以及(iii)专业法规如何塑造核磁共振特异性IRs。在高校层面上,提高信息技术应用的策略包括树立意识、做出适当的合理调整和政策调整。研究发现,通过培养自我意识和与专业能力标准保持一致,IRs有助于应对和恢复力。然而,在确保学生有意义地参与到注册会计师中,以及确保注册会计师不影响学生的实践能力方面,挑战依然存在。结论虽然IRs在理论上具有一定的价值,但其目前的不可执行性和不一致的应用限制了其潜在的影响。使IRs与专业能力标准保持一致可以增强其效用,同时保持包容性和法律遵从性。对实践的启示大学应该通过将ir和ra整合到MR课程和招生过程中来改善他们之间的沟通。在利益相关者咨询的支持下,明确与专业标准保持一致,可以使学生做出明智的决定,增强弹性,并减少临床实习期间的现实冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信