The impact of losing control over threat on the acquisition, extinction, and renewal of conditioned fear

IF 4.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Michalina Dudziak , Mathijs Franssen , Bram Vervliet , Tom Beckers
{"title":"The impact of losing control over threat on the acquisition, extinction, and renewal of conditioned fear","authors":"Michalina Dudziak ,&nbsp;Mathijs Franssen ,&nbsp;Bram Vervliet ,&nbsp;Tom Beckers","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncontrollable situations are often experienced as more challenging than those within our control. Recently, it has been proposed that threat (un)controllability also affects fear learning processes. Most studies compare two variants of threat control – lacking versus having control. However, the impact of a sudden <em>loss</em> of control remains understudied. The current study investigated the impact of loss of control over threat on conditioned fear. We randomly assigned 80 participants to a Continuous Control (CC) or a Loss of Control (LC) group and administered a threat (un)controllability task integrated into a fear conditioning procedure. Participants were presented with two pictures, one consistently paired with an electrical stimulus (US). Participants from the CC group could learn to terminate the US with a mouse click. Participants in the LC group could terminate the stimulus initially but then lost this possibility. During the extinction and renewal phases, the pictures were repeatedly presented without the US. A new background context was introduced in the renewal phase. US-expectancy ratings, skin-conductance responses, fear ratings, and control predictions were collected throughout the procedure. The LC group displayed higher cue-elicited fear and lower expected control than the CC group in acquisition. Loss of control during acquisition had little effects on extinction and renewal of conditioned fear responses, apart from a remarkable and sustained reduction in expected control throughout extinction in the LC group. These findings suggest that losing control over threat may have limited acute effects on fear learning but lingering effects on people's anticipated control over future situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 104842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncontrollable situations are often experienced as more challenging than those within our control. Recently, it has been proposed that threat (un)controllability also affects fear learning processes. Most studies compare two variants of threat control – lacking versus having control. However, the impact of a sudden loss of control remains understudied. The current study investigated the impact of loss of control over threat on conditioned fear. We randomly assigned 80 participants to a Continuous Control (CC) or a Loss of Control (LC) group and administered a threat (un)controllability task integrated into a fear conditioning procedure. Participants were presented with two pictures, one consistently paired with an electrical stimulus (US). Participants from the CC group could learn to terminate the US with a mouse click. Participants in the LC group could terminate the stimulus initially but then lost this possibility. During the extinction and renewal phases, the pictures were repeatedly presented without the US. A new background context was introduced in the renewal phase. US-expectancy ratings, skin-conductance responses, fear ratings, and control predictions were collected throughout the procedure. The LC group displayed higher cue-elicited fear and lower expected control than the CC group in acquisition. Loss of control during acquisition had little effects on extinction and renewal of conditioned fear responses, apart from a remarkable and sustained reduction in expected control throughout extinction in the LC group. These findings suggest that losing control over threat may have limited acute effects on fear learning but lingering effects on people's anticipated control over future situations.
失去对威胁的控制对条件性恐惧的获得、消失和更新的影响
无法控制的情况往往比我们能控制的情况更具挑战性。最近,有人提出威胁(不)可控性也会影响恐惧学习过程。大多数研究比较了威胁控制的两种变体——缺乏控制和拥有控制。然而,突然失去控制的影响仍未得到充分研究。目前的研究调查了失去对威胁的控制对条件恐惧的影响。我们将80名参与者随机分配到持续控制组(CC)或失去控制组(LC),并进行了一项与恐惧调节程序相结合的威胁(非)可控性任务。研究人员向参与者展示了两张图片,其中一张始终与电刺激(US)配对。CC组的参与者可以学会用鼠标点击来终止美国。LC组的参与者最初可以终止刺激,但随后失去了这种可能性。在灭绝和更新阶段,这些照片反复出现,没有美国。在更新阶段引入了新的背景背景。在整个过程中收集美国期望评分、皮肤电导反应、恐惧评分和控制预测。LC组在习得方面表现出较高的线索恐惧和较低的期望控制。在习得过程中失去控制对条件恐惧反应的消退和更新几乎没有影响,除了LC组在整个消退过程中预期控制的显著和持续减少。这些发现表明,失去对威胁的控制可能对恐惧学习的急性影响有限,但对人们对未来情况的预期控制的影响是持久的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信