Women with epilepsy during pregnancy: A systematic review of current guidelines

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Zhu Liu , Qiulei Hong , Luyan Huang , Leihao Sha , Anjiao Peng , Lei Chen
{"title":"Women with epilepsy during pregnancy: A systematic review of current guidelines","authors":"Zhu Liu ,&nbsp;Qiulei Hong ,&nbsp;Luyan Huang ,&nbsp;Leihao Sha ,&nbsp;Anjiao Peng ,&nbsp;Lei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the quality of existing guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) and compare their key recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review of available clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements was conducted. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research &amp; Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Core information was extracted using a predefined form and subjected to comparative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Only 14 guidelines on WWE pregnancy management have been published worldwide. Most guidelines performed well in scope definition, clarity of purpose, and presentation, but the evidence base was relatively weak. Recommendations were largely consistent across guidelines regarding preconception counseling, folic acid supplementation, vaginal delivery, breastfeeding, and avoidance of valproate. However, discrepancies were observed in the selection of certain antiseizure medications (ASMs), therapeutic drug monitoring, and the timing and dosage of folic acid supplementation. Current guidelines lack recommendations on newer ASMs and antinociceptive management during delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The variability in recommendations among WWE pregnancy management guidelines reflects the insufficiency of the existing evidence base, highlighting the need for enhanced methodological rigor in guideline development and more comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations. Establishing large-scale prospective pregnancy registries is critical for improving WWE pregnancy management guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 110658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025003981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically evaluate the quality of existing guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) and compare their key recommendations.

Methods

A systematic review of available clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements was conducted. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Core information was extracted using a predefined form and subjected to comparative analysis.

Results

Only 14 guidelines on WWE pregnancy management have been published worldwide. Most guidelines performed well in scope definition, clarity of purpose, and presentation, but the evidence base was relatively weak. Recommendations were largely consistent across guidelines regarding preconception counseling, folic acid supplementation, vaginal delivery, breastfeeding, and avoidance of valproate. However, discrepancies were observed in the selection of certain antiseizure medications (ASMs), therapeutic drug monitoring, and the timing and dosage of folic acid supplementation. Current guidelines lack recommendations on newer ASMs and antinociceptive management during delivery.

Conclusion

The variability in recommendations among WWE pregnancy management guidelines reflects the insufficiency of the existing evidence base, highlighting the need for enhanced methodological rigor in guideline development and more comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations. Establishing large-scale prospective pregnancy registries is critical for improving WWE pregnancy management guidelines.
妊娠期间患有癫痫的妇女:对现行指南的系统回顾
目的系统评价现有癫痫孕妇妊娠管理指南的质量,并比较其主要建议。方法系统回顾现有临床实践指南和专家共识声明。使用研究评估指南II (AGREE II)工具评估文献的质量。使用预定义的形式提取核心信息并进行比较分析。结果世界范围内仅发表了14份WWE妊娠管理指南。大多数指南在范围定义、目的清晰度和陈述方面表现良好,但证据基础相对薄弱。关于孕前咨询、叶酸补充、阴道分娩、母乳喂养和避免丙戊酸盐的建议在很大程度上是一致的。然而,在某些抗癫痫药物(asm)的选择、治疗药物监测以及叶酸补充的时间和剂量方面观察到差异。目前的指南缺乏关于分娩过程中较新的性高潮和抗避孕措施的建议。结论WWE妊娠管理指南建议的差异反映了现有证据基础的不足,强调了在指南制定过程中需要加强方法学的严谨性和更全面、循证的建议。建立大规模的前瞻性妊娠登记是改善WWE妊娠管理指南的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信