S. Chhina , S. Moreheart , J. Claydon , B. Udall , M. Sadarangani , H. Longstaff , A. Orth , Q. Doan
{"title":"Overcoming language barriers in pediatric clinical research: A qualitative study of researchers' views","authors":"S. Chhina , S. Moreheart , J. Claydon , B. Udall , M. Sadarangani , H. Longstaff , A. Orth , Q. Doan","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited English proficiency (LEP) can act as a barrier to equitable access to pediatric clinical research participation. This study examined researchers' perspectives on challenges and opportunities for including patients and families with LEP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 researchers and hospital leaders at two hospitals in British Columbia, Canada. Interviews explored experiences offering research opportunities to populations with LEP and perceived barriers and facilitators. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five themes emerged: 1) lack of translation/interpretation resources; 2) unclear best practices; 3) doubts about translation quality; 4) low prioritization; 5) facilitators. Barriers existed at institutional and individual levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A comprehensive approach is needed to support equitable participation of patients with LEP in pediatric health research, including increased funding, cultural competence training, community partnerships, and language-inclusive design. Recognizing and addressing multi-level barriers can promote fully representative and equitable research participation for populations with LEP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525001306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Limited English proficiency (LEP) can act as a barrier to equitable access to pediatric clinical research participation. This study examined researchers' perspectives on challenges and opportunities for including patients and families with LEP.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 researchers and hospital leaders at two hospitals in British Columbia, Canada. Interviews explored experiences offering research opportunities to populations with LEP and perceived barriers and facilitators. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview transcripts.
Results
Five themes emerged: 1) lack of translation/interpretation resources; 2) unclear best practices; 3) doubts about translation quality; 4) low prioritization; 5) facilitators. Barriers existed at institutional and individual levels.
Conclusion
A comprehensive approach is needed to support equitable participation of patients with LEP in pediatric health research, including increased funding, cultural competence training, community partnerships, and language-inclusive design. Recognizing and addressing multi-level barriers can promote fully representative and equitable research participation for populations with LEP.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.