Incorporating Evidence-Based Medicine into health diplomacy: A strategic imperative for equitable global health

Q3 Medicine
A. Dutta
{"title":"Incorporating Evidence-Based Medicine into health diplomacy: A strategic imperative for equitable global health","authors":"A. Dutta","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health diplomacy is an emerging domain within international relations, playing a vital role in addressing global health challenges through multilateral cooperation. Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) into health diplomacy offers a systematic and scientific foundation for shaping health policies and interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This article aims to explore the role of EBM in health diplomacy, emphasizing its potential to guide evidence-informed decision-making, strengthen international collaborations, and improve healthcare equity and outcomes globally.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative analysis was conducted, drawing upon interdisciplinary literature and case examples to examine the integration of EBM into diplomatic processes. The study also identifies key challenges and strategic approaches for operationalizing EBM within international health frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incorporation of EBM into health diplomacy can enhance global health security and intervention efficiency. However, implementation faces barriers including political interests, cultural variations, and disparities in scientific literacy. Promising strategies include establishing evidence translation units, embedding scientific advisors in diplomatic missions, and building capacity among diplomats. The article also highlights the need for incorporating traditional medicine within EBM frameworks, through research, regulation, and respect for cultural diversity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The evolving field of health diplomacy stands to benefit significantly from EBM integration. Addressing challenges and leveraging strategic interventions can enable more effective, equitable, and ethical global health governance. The article recommends enhancing global evidence-sharing mechanisms, promoting cross-sectoral expertise, and establishing ethical guidelines for evidence use in diplomatic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525001343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health diplomacy is an emerging domain within international relations, playing a vital role in addressing global health challenges through multilateral cooperation. Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) into health diplomacy offers a systematic and scientific foundation for shaping health policies and interventions.

Objective

This article aims to explore the role of EBM in health diplomacy, emphasizing its potential to guide evidence-informed decision-making, strengthen international collaborations, and improve healthcare equity and outcomes globally.

Methods

A narrative analysis was conducted, drawing upon interdisciplinary literature and case examples to examine the integration of EBM into diplomatic processes. The study also identifies key challenges and strategic approaches for operationalizing EBM within international health frameworks.

Results

The incorporation of EBM into health diplomacy can enhance global health security and intervention efficiency. However, implementation faces barriers including political interests, cultural variations, and disparities in scientific literacy. Promising strategies include establishing evidence translation units, embedding scientific advisors in diplomatic missions, and building capacity among diplomats. The article also highlights the need for incorporating traditional medicine within EBM frameworks, through research, regulation, and respect for cultural diversity.

Conclusion

The evolving field of health diplomacy stands to benefit significantly from EBM integration. Addressing challenges and leveraging strategic interventions can enable more effective, equitable, and ethical global health governance. The article recommends enhancing global evidence-sharing mechanisms, promoting cross-sectoral expertise, and establishing ethical guidelines for evidence use in diplomatic contexts.
将循证医学纳入卫生外交:实现全球卫生公平的战略要求
卫生外交是国际关系中的一个新兴领域,在通过多边合作应对全球卫生挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。将循证医学纳入卫生外交为制定卫生政策和干预措施提供了系统和科学的基础。本文旨在探讨循证医学在卫生外交中的作用,强调其在指导循证决策、加强国际合作以及改善全球卫生保健公平和成果方面的潜力。方法进行叙事分析,借鉴跨学科文献和案例,考察实证医学与外交进程的整合。该研究还确定了在国际卫生框架内实施循证医学的主要挑战和战略方针。结果循证医学与卫生外交相结合,可提高全球卫生安全和干预效率。然而,实施面临着包括政治利益、文化差异和科学素养差异在内的障碍。有希望的战略包括建立证据翻译单位、在外交使团中安插科学顾问以及建设外交官的能力。这篇文章还强调了通过研究、管理和尊重文化多样性将传统医学纳入循证医学框架的必要性。结论不断发展的卫生外交领域将显著受益于循证医学整合。应对挑战和利用战略干预措施可以实现更有效、公平和合乎道德的全球卫生治理。这篇文章建议加强全球证据共享机制,促进跨部门专业知识,并为外交背景下的证据使用制定道德准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信