{"title":"Incorporating Evidence-Based Medicine into health diplomacy: A strategic imperative for equitable global health","authors":"A. Dutta","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health diplomacy is an emerging domain within international relations, playing a vital role in addressing global health challenges through multilateral cooperation. Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) into health diplomacy offers a systematic and scientific foundation for shaping health policies and interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This article aims to explore the role of EBM in health diplomacy, emphasizing its potential to guide evidence-informed decision-making, strengthen international collaborations, and improve healthcare equity and outcomes globally.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative analysis was conducted, drawing upon interdisciplinary literature and case examples to examine the integration of EBM into diplomatic processes. The study also identifies key challenges and strategic approaches for operationalizing EBM within international health frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incorporation of EBM into health diplomacy can enhance global health security and intervention efficiency. However, implementation faces barriers including political interests, cultural variations, and disparities in scientific literacy. Promising strategies include establishing evidence translation units, embedding scientific advisors in diplomatic missions, and building capacity among diplomats. The article also highlights the need for incorporating traditional medicine within EBM frameworks, through research, regulation, and respect for cultural diversity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The evolving field of health diplomacy stands to benefit significantly from EBM integration. Addressing challenges and leveraging strategic interventions can enable more effective, equitable, and ethical global health governance. The article recommends enhancing global evidence-sharing mechanisms, promoting cross-sectoral expertise, and establishing ethical guidelines for evidence use in diplomatic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525001343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Health diplomacy is an emerging domain within international relations, playing a vital role in addressing global health challenges through multilateral cooperation. Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) into health diplomacy offers a systematic and scientific foundation for shaping health policies and interventions.
Objective
This article aims to explore the role of EBM in health diplomacy, emphasizing its potential to guide evidence-informed decision-making, strengthen international collaborations, and improve healthcare equity and outcomes globally.
Methods
A narrative analysis was conducted, drawing upon interdisciplinary literature and case examples to examine the integration of EBM into diplomatic processes. The study also identifies key challenges and strategic approaches for operationalizing EBM within international health frameworks.
Results
The incorporation of EBM into health diplomacy can enhance global health security and intervention efficiency. However, implementation faces barriers including political interests, cultural variations, and disparities in scientific literacy. Promising strategies include establishing evidence translation units, embedding scientific advisors in diplomatic missions, and building capacity among diplomats. The article also highlights the need for incorporating traditional medicine within EBM frameworks, through research, regulation, and respect for cultural diversity.
Conclusion
The evolving field of health diplomacy stands to benefit significantly from EBM integration. Addressing challenges and leveraging strategic interventions can enable more effective, equitable, and ethical global health governance. The article recommends enhancing global evidence-sharing mechanisms, promoting cross-sectoral expertise, and establishing ethical guidelines for evidence use in diplomatic contexts.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.