Enhancing the hydrological performance of Low Impact Development infrastructure through earthworm activity and vegetation dynamics for mitigating urban flooding

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Khalil Lhamidi, Jamal El Khattabi
{"title":"Enhancing the hydrological performance of Low Impact Development infrastructure through earthworm activity and vegetation dynamics for mitigating urban flooding","authors":"Khalil Lhamidi,&nbsp;Jamal El Khattabi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban soil sealing and anthropogenic activities, combined with the increasing intensity of rainfall due to climate change, is a threat to urban environments, exacerbating flood risks. To assess these challenges, Low Impact Development strategies, based on Nature-based solutions, are a key solution to mitigate urban flooding. To enhance the hydrological performance of LID infrastructure, and to meet the guideline requirements related to emptying time, specifically in low hydraulic conductivity soils, earthworm activity and vegetation dynamics can play a major role. The ETAGEP experimental site was built to study to address those challenges. 12 swales (10 m<sup>2</sup> infiltration area for each swale) were monitored to evaluate the impact of earthworm activity (<em>A. caliginosa</em> and L. <em>terrestris)</em> and vegetation dynamics (<em>Rye Grass, Petasites hybridus and Salix alba</em>) to enhance the hydrological performance. The infiltration rate of the swales evolved in a differentiated manner, with an increase of 16.1 % to 310.8 % and draining times decrease of 13.9 % to 75.7, depending on initial soil hydro-physical properties and the impervious areas of the catchment which influence runoff volumes. The simulations on SWMM software showed similar results, with an enhancement of the hydraulic conductivity of N6 swales (60 m<sup>2</sup> total catchment area) increasing from 18 mm h<sup>−1</sup> to 25 mm h<sup>−1</sup>, and a reduction of drawdown time by 24.4 % (N6) and 20.8 % (N11–110 m<sup>2</sup> active surface). A simulated storm event of 44.8 mm resulted in an overflow of 2.12 m<sup>3</sup> for the N11 swale configuration, while no overflow was observed for N6. These results highlight the ecosystem services of earthworms for a sustainable stormwater management in urban environments, enhancing the hydrological performance of LID infrastructures and reducing therefore flood risks and limiting pressure on drainage network.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 107786"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban soil sealing and anthropogenic activities, combined with the increasing intensity of rainfall due to climate change, is a threat to urban environments, exacerbating flood risks. To assess these challenges, Low Impact Development strategies, based on Nature-based solutions, are a key solution to mitigate urban flooding. To enhance the hydrological performance of LID infrastructure, and to meet the guideline requirements related to emptying time, specifically in low hydraulic conductivity soils, earthworm activity and vegetation dynamics can play a major role. The ETAGEP experimental site was built to study to address those challenges. 12 swales (10 m2 infiltration area for each swale) were monitored to evaluate the impact of earthworm activity (A. caliginosa and L. terrestris) and vegetation dynamics (Rye Grass, Petasites hybridus and Salix alba) to enhance the hydrological performance. The infiltration rate of the swales evolved in a differentiated manner, with an increase of 16.1 % to 310.8 % and draining times decrease of 13.9 % to 75.7, depending on initial soil hydro-physical properties and the impervious areas of the catchment which influence runoff volumes. The simulations on SWMM software showed similar results, with an enhancement of the hydraulic conductivity of N6 swales (60 m2 total catchment area) increasing from 18 mm h−1 to 25 mm h−1, and a reduction of drawdown time by 24.4 % (N6) and 20.8 % (N11–110 m2 active surface). A simulated storm event of 44.8 mm resulted in an overflow of 2.12 m3 for the N11 swale configuration, while no overflow was observed for N6. These results highlight the ecosystem services of earthworms for a sustainable stormwater management in urban environments, enhancing the hydrological performance of LID infrastructures and reducing therefore flood risks and limiting pressure on drainage network.
通过蚯蚓活动和植被动态来提高低影响发展基础设施的水文性能,以减轻城市洪水
城市土壤封闭和人为活动,加上气候变化导致的降雨强度增加,对城市环境构成威胁,加剧了洪水风险。为了评估这些挑战,基于基于自然的解决方案的低影响发展战略是缓解城市洪水的关键解决方案。为了提高LID基础设施的水文性能,并满足与排空时间有关的指导要求,特别是在低水力导电性土壤中,蚯蚓活动和植被动态可以发挥主要作用。ETAGEP试验场的建立就是为了研究如何应对这些挑战。对12个洼地(每个洼地的入渗面积为10 m2)进行监测,评价蚯蚓活动(A. caliginosa和L. terrestris)和植被动态(黑麦草、Petasites hybridus和Salix alba)对提高水文性能的影响。根据初始土壤水物理性质和流域不透水区域对径流量的影响,流域的入渗率呈分化变化,增加16.1%至310.8%,排水次数减少13.9%至75.7次。在SWMM软件上的模拟显示了类似的结果,N6流域(60 m2总流域面积)的水力导电性从18 mm h−1增加到25 mm h−1,并减少了24.4% (N6)和20.8% (N11-110 m2活性表面)的下降时间。在模拟的44.8 mm风暴事件中,N11洼地的溢出量为2.12 m3,而N6洼地没有溢出。这些结果强调了蚯蚓在城市环境中可持续雨水管理的生态系统服务,增强了LID基础设施的水文性能,从而减少了洪水风险和排水网络的限制压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信