Measuring woman’s perception of support and control during childbirth: Psychometric proprieties of the SCIB scale in an Italian sample

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sara Molgora , Federica Bonazza , Maurizio Barbieri Carones , Enrico Maria Ferrazzi , Elizabeth Ford
{"title":"Measuring woman’s perception of support and control during childbirth: Psychometric proprieties of the SCIB scale in an Italian sample","authors":"Sara Molgora ,&nbsp;Federica Bonazza ,&nbsp;Maurizio Barbieri Carones ,&nbsp;Enrico Maria Ferrazzi ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to develop an Italian version of the Support and Control in Birth (SCIB) and to test its reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The sample included 414 post-partum women, who were recruited 24/48 h after giving birth. A study-specific online questionnaire was designed to collect sociodemographic information and administer the translated Italian version of the SCIB. The construct validity of the Italian SCIB was first analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Based on metrics showing a poor fit, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was then executed. The reliability of the instrument was verified through Cronbach’s alpha for each subscale and the total scale and test-retest correlation coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CFA was performed to test the original three-factor theoretical model; however, the CFA solution showed a poor fit. Specifically, χ2 = 2100, df= 492, p &lt; 0.001, RMSEA = 0.0888 (0.085 – 0.0928), and CFI = 0.45. The theoretical model did not adequately fit the observed data. Thus, EFA was conducted; it yielded a six-factor structure. The six factors were named: Support: healthcare professionals’ guidance; Support: healthcare professionals’ presence; External control: control over medical procedures; External control: control over the informational process; Internal control: control over emotional and physical reactions; Internal control: control over pain. These factors replicate the originals dimensions, each divided into two further subfactors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings enhance knowledge about childbirth by cross-culturally adapting an instrument to assess perceptions of control and support, fundamental factors in birth experience. SCIB could help health professionals to monitor women's childbirth experiences and introduce tailored interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161325000602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to develop an Italian version of the Support and Control in Birth (SCIB) and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods

The sample included 414 post-partum women, who were recruited 24/48 h after giving birth. A study-specific online questionnaire was designed to collect sociodemographic information and administer the translated Italian version of the SCIB. The construct validity of the Italian SCIB was first analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Based on metrics showing a poor fit, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was then executed. The reliability of the instrument was verified through Cronbach’s alpha for each subscale and the total scale and test-retest correlation coefficient.

Results

CFA was performed to test the original three-factor theoretical model; however, the CFA solution showed a poor fit. Specifically, χ2 = 2100, df= 492, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.0888 (0.085 – 0.0928), and CFI = 0.45. The theoretical model did not adequately fit the observed data. Thus, EFA was conducted; it yielded a six-factor structure. The six factors were named: Support: healthcare professionals’ guidance; Support: healthcare professionals’ presence; External control: control over medical procedures; External control: control over the informational process; Internal control: control over emotional and physical reactions; Internal control: control over pain. These factors replicate the originals dimensions, each divided into two further subfactors.

Conclusion

Findings enhance knowledge about childbirth by cross-culturally adapting an instrument to assess perceptions of control and support, fundamental factors in birth experience. SCIB could help health professionals to monitor women's childbirth experiences and introduce tailored interventions.
测量妇女在分娩过程中对支持和控制的感知:意大利样本中SCIB量表的心理测量特性
目的编制意大利语版的分娩支持与控制量表(SCIB),并对其信效度进行检验。方法选取414名产后妇女,于分娩后24/48 h进行调查。设计了一份研究特定的在线问卷,以收集社会人口统计信息并管理SCIB的意大利语翻译版本。首先采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对意大利SCIB的结构效度进行分析。基于显示不适合的指标,然后执行探索性因素分析(EFA)。通过各子量表、总量表和重测相关系数的Cronbach’s alpha来验证仪器的信度。结果采用scfa对原三因素理论模型进行检验;然而,CFA解决方案显示不太适合。具体而言,χ2 = 2100,df= 492,p <; 0.001,RMSEA = 0.0888 (0.085 - 0.0928),CFI = 0.45。理论模型不能充分拟合观测数据。因此,进行了全民教育;它产生了一个六因子结构。这六个因素被命名为:支持:医护人员的指导;支持:医疗保健专业人员的存在;外部控制:对医疗程序的控制;外部控制:控制信息过程;内部控制:对情绪和身体反应的控制;内在控制:控制疼痛。这些因素复制了原始维度,每个维度又分为两个子因素。结论:研究结果通过跨文化适应一种工具来评估控制和支持的感知,提高了对分娩的认识,这是分娩经验的基本因素。SCIB可以帮助卫生专业人员监测妇女的分娩经历,并采取有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信