Rose Macaulay, Stephanie Lavau, Nicholas S.G. Williams, Amy K. Hahs
{"title":"Socio-cultural patterns in how residents value and use green space in new greenfield developments","authors":"Rose Macaulay, Stephanie Lavau, Nicholas S.G. Williams, Amy K. Hahs","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding green space values and interactions in greenfield residential estates is crucial for urban planning, yet there is a distinct lack of research on how these culturally diverse, new communities interact with green spaces such as parks and private gardens. This study examines how socio-cultural factors and nature values influence residents’ interactions with green spaces in these new developments. We conducted an online survey of people living in recently developed greenfield estates across three capital cities in Southeast Australia (<em>n</em> = 1041). The survey assessed core nature values and valued attributes of private and public green spaces, visitation frequency of parks and backyards, life satisfaction and nature connection. Respondents also indicated preferences for house and backyard size (keeping land parcel area constant) of a hypothetical future home. Our findings reveal specific socio-cultural differences in values and green space interactions. In our sample, women value social attributes of green spaces more than men, and older people spend more time in private green spaces and value natural attributes of public green space more than younger people. Green space visits were positively associated with nature connection and life satisfaction, but different nature values related to these outcomes in contrasting ways. Notably, 49 % of respondents preferred a smaller home and corresponding larger backyard, when asked about moving into a new home. The results suggest that green spaces in greenfield developments should be designed to maintain a natural landscape while supporting recreation and social interactions. They also emphasise that there is demand for smaller house footprints relative to residential block sizes which could have substantial benefits for urban sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129030"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding green space values and interactions in greenfield residential estates is crucial for urban planning, yet there is a distinct lack of research on how these culturally diverse, new communities interact with green spaces such as parks and private gardens. This study examines how socio-cultural factors and nature values influence residents’ interactions with green spaces in these new developments. We conducted an online survey of people living in recently developed greenfield estates across three capital cities in Southeast Australia (n = 1041). The survey assessed core nature values and valued attributes of private and public green spaces, visitation frequency of parks and backyards, life satisfaction and nature connection. Respondents also indicated preferences for house and backyard size (keeping land parcel area constant) of a hypothetical future home. Our findings reveal specific socio-cultural differences in values and green space interactions. In our sample, women value social attributes of green spaces more than men, and older people spend more time in private green spaces and value natural attributes of public green space more than younger people. Green space visits were positively associated with nature connection and life satisfaction, but different nature values related to these outcomes in contrasting ways. Notably, 49 % of respondents preferred a smaller home and corresponding larger backyard, when asked about moving into a new home. The results suggest that green spaces in greenfield developments should be designed to maintain a natural landscape while supporting recreation and social interactions. They also emphasise that there is demand for smaller house footprints relative to residential block sizes which could have substantial benefits for urban sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.