Exploring the association between multi-dimensional poverty and antibiotic resistance: findings from a mixed-methods study in Pakistan

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Iltaf Hussain , Muhammad Fawad Rasool , Jamshid Ullah , Muhammad Nafees , Inzemam Khan , Muhtar Kadirhaz , Miaomiao Xu , Chengzhou Tang , Yi Dong , Wei Zhao , Jie Chang , Yu Fang
{"title":"Exploring the association between multi-dimensional poverty and antibiotic resistance: findings from a mixed-methods study in Pakistan","authors":"Iltaf Hussain ,&nbsp;Muhammad Fawad Rasool ,&nbsp;Jamshid Ullah ,&nbsp;Muhammad Nafees ,&nbsp;Inzemam Khan ,&nbsp;Muhtar Kadirhaz ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Xu ,&nbsp;Chengzhou Tang ,&nbsp;Yi Dong ,&nbsp;Wei Zhao ,&nbsp;Jie Chang ,&nbsp;Yu Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Poverty is a potential contributor to antibiotic resistance; however, the previous studies have not adequately addressed the role of poverty in shaping antibiotic resistance through social inequalities. Considering this, the current study evaluated the role of multi-dimensional poverty in antibiotic resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-method study was conducted in three provinces of Pakistan using multistage sampling to recruit physician-confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI) patients from public laboratories. Antibiotic resistance data were collected from susceptibility reports, while poverty was measured using the multi-dimensional poverty index (MPI). Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices were assessed through a self-developed, validated questionnaire. Survey-weighted logistic regression analysis examined the association between MPI and antibiotic resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 698 patients were recruited, with more than half being in some level of deprivation (total = 413, vulnerable: 117, deprived: 76, severely deprived: 220). Multidimensional poverty was independently associated with increased odds of multidrug resistance (MDR). The risk of MDR was significantly increase across the deprivation level in unadjusted analysis (vulnerable; OR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.11–3.39, deprived; OR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.06–3.98, and severely deprived: OR: 1.80, 95% CI 1.04–3.09). After adjusting for antibiotics misuse and poor WASH practices, the association persisted. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of MDR was further increased in the poorer-subgroups, (vulnerable; aORs: 3.03, 95% CI 1.33–6.73, deprived; aOR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.26–7.15, and severely deprived; aOR: 4.28 95% CI 1.74–10.49). The qualitative interviews (n = 34) from patients highlighted that financial barriers drove self-medication with leftover antibiotics and treatment non-adherence. Poor WASH infrastructure was described as a systemic contributor to infection spread. In addition, patients in the poorer subgroups were presented with delayed treatment seeking.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The risk of antibiotic resistance increases with the increasing levels of deprivation; however, we should not assume that higher deprivation directly drives antibiotic resistance. Instead, structural barriers such as limited healthcare access, poor WASH infrastructure, and financial constraints create an environment where self-medication, treatment non-adherence, and infection transmission occur across all poverty levels, not just because of individual choices. These findings emphasize the need for interventions that address healthcare inequities, improve WASH infrastructure, and regulate antibiotic access, combined with behavior-changing interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This work was funded by the <span>“Young Talent Support Plan”</span> of the <span>Health Science Center</span>, <span>Xi’an Jiaotong University</span>, and the <span>National Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (grant number <span><span>72274150</span></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100656"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368225001271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Poverty is a potential contributor to antibiotic resistance; however, the previous studies have not adequately addressed the role of poverty in shaping antibiotic resistance through social inequalities. Considering this, the current study evaluated the role of multi-dimensional poverty in antibiotic resistance.

Methods

A mixed-method study was conducted in three provinces of Pakistan using multistage sampling to recruit physician-confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI) patients from public laboratories. Antibiotic resistance data were collected from susceptibility reports, while poverty was measured using the multi-dimensional poverty index (MPI). Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices were assessed through a self-developed, validated questionnaire. Survey-weighted logistic regression analysis examined the association between MPI and antibiotic resistance.

Findings

A total of 698 patients were recruited, with more than half being in some level of deprivation (total = 413, vulnerable: 117, deprived: 76, severely deprived: 220). Multidimensional poverty was independently associated with increased odds of multidrug resistance (MDR). The risk of MDR was significantly increase across the deprivation level in unadjusted analysis (vulnerable; OR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.11–3.39, deprived; OR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.06–3.98, and severely deprived: OR: 1.80, 95% CI 1.04–3.09). After adjusting for antibiotics misuse and poor WASH practices, the association persisted. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of MDR was further increased in the poorer-subgroups, (vulnerable; aORs: 3.03, 95% CI 1.33–6.73, deprived; aOR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.26–7.15, and severely deprived; aOR: 4.28 95% CI 1.74–10.49). The qualitative interviews (n = 34) from patients highlighted that financial barriers drove self-medication with leftover antibiotics and treatment non-adherence. Poor WASH infrastructure was described as a systemic contributor to infection spread. In addition, patients in the poorer subgroups were presented with delayed treatment seeking.

Interpretation

The risk of antibiotic resistance increases with the increasing levels of deprivation; however, we should not assume that higher deprivation directly drives antibiotic resistance. Instead, structural barriers such as limited healthcare access, poor WASH infrastructure, and financial constraints create an environment where self-medication, treatment non-adherence, and infection transmission occur across all poverty levels, not just because of individual choices. These findings emphasize the need for interventions that address healthcare inequities, improve WASH infrastructure, and regulate antibiotic access, combined with behavior-changing interventions.

Funding

This work was funded by the “Young Talent Support Plan” of the Health Science Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 72274150).
探索多维贫困与抗生素耐药性之间的关系:来自巴基斯坦一项混合方法研究的结果
贫困是抗生素耐药性的一个潜在因素;然而,以前的研究并没有充分解决贫困在通过社会不平等形成抗生素耐药性方面的作用。考虑到这一点,本研究评估了多维贫困在抗生素耐药性中的作用。方法采用混合方法,在巴基斯坦3个省采用多阶段抽样方法,从公共实验室招募医生确诊的尿路感染(UTI)患者。从药敏报告中收集抗生素耐药性数据,而使用多维贫困指数(MPI)衡量贫困。水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)做法通过自行开发的有效问卷进行评估。调查加权logistic回归分析检验了MPI与抗生素耐药性之间的关系。研究结果共招募了698名患者,其中一半以上处于某种程度的剥夺状态(总数= 413,脆弱:117,剥夺:76,严重剥夺:220)。多维贫困与多药耐药(MDR)几率增加独立相关。在未调整的分析中,MDR的风险在剥夺水平上显著增加(脆弱;OR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.11-3.39;剥夺;OR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.06-3.98;严重剥夺:OR: 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.09)。在调整了抗生素滥用和不良的WASH做法后,这种关联仍然存在。在完全调整后的模型中,较贫困亚组的耐多药风险进一步增加(易感亚组,aOR: 3.03, 95% CI 1.33-6.73,贫困亚组;aOR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.26-7.15,严重贫困亚组;aOR: 4.28, 95% CI 1.74-10.49)。来自患者的定性访谈(n = 34)强调了经济障碍导致使用剩余抗生素和治疗依从性不强的自我用药。不良的讲卫生基础设施被认为是导致感染传播的一个系统性因素。此外,较贫穷亚组的患者出现了延迟寻求治疗的情况。抗生素耐药性的风险随着剥夺程度的增加而增加;然而,我们不应该假设更高的剥夺直接导致抗生素耐药性。相反,结构性障碍,如有限的医疗服务可及性、落后的讲卫生基础设施和财政限制,创造了一种环境,使自我药疗、不坚持治疗和感染传播发生在所有贫困水平,而不仅仅是由于个人的选择。这些发现强调需要采取干预措施,解决卫生保健不公平问题,改善讲卫生基础设施,规范抗生素获取,并结合改变行为的干预措施。本工作由西安交通大学医学部“青年人才支持计划”和国家自然科学基金(批准号:72274150)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信