Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Pradip Banerjee , Sudipta Bose , Sandip Dhole , Cameron Truong
{"title":"Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk","authors":"Pradip Banerjee ,&nbsp;Sudipta Bose ,&nbsp;Sandip Dhole ,&nbsp;Cameron Truong","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108847"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.
绿色行动:企业减少碳排放以应对政治风险
本研究探讨企业是否会减少碳排放以应对政治风险的增加。政治风险往往会带来严重的经济后果,促使企业采取政治游说等代价高昂的策略。或者,企业可以选择管理他们的排放,以部分减轻政治风险。我们认为,高碳排放可能会招致不必要的政治审查,从而使减排成为对不断升级的政治风险的战略回应。我们的研究结果表明,企业确实在应对政治风险时降低了排放量。此外,我们发现特定的企业特征会影响政治风险与碳排放之间的关系。最后,我们表明企业通过环境创新投资实现了减排。为了研究稳健性,我们采用了多种识别策略,包括熵平衡、工具变量分析和准自然实验。我们的研究结果强调了减排作为应对政治风险的战略重要性,为政策制定者、投资者和企业决策者提供了将可持续性努力与风险管理战略相结合的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信