A metamodern public relations workflow for the polycrisis: Communication research and planning based on a What If framework

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Ana Adi , Thomas Stoeckle
{"title":"A metamodern public relations workflow for the polycrisis: Communication research and planning based on a What If framework","authors":"Ana Adi ,&nbsp;Thomas Stoeckle","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a world of intersecting crises—climate, conflict, inequality—public relations finds itself in flux, facing situations without single or obvious solutions. This article proposes a metamodern workflow for public relations, one that embraces uncertainty, pluralism, and relational ethics. Drawing on recent conceptual work, we position generative AI not as a solutionist tool for efficiency, but as a provocation: a mirror of our sociotechnical condition and a medium for speculative, stakeholder-centric practice. The proposed genAI enhanced ‘what if’ workflow replaces deterministic ‘if-then’ logic models with reflective, scenario-based approaches, embedding deliberative temporality, stakeholder co-creation, and ethical humility into communication planning. This shift from managerial instrumentalist to stakeholder-centric thinking reclaims public relations as a site of societal value—not in opposition to organizational strategy, but as its reimagined core. This, we argue, enables public relations practitioners to become curators of complexity and facilitators of communitas: cultivating shared meaning across difference, rather than smoothing it over. Furthermore, we explore how genAI can support—but not substitute—this role, modeling possible futures and mapping divergent stakeholder positions. This metamodern orientation does not resolve paradoxes but inhabits them, oscillating between pragmatism and idealism, structure and fluidity. It critiques the legacy of commercial democracy and managerial instrumentalism while offering an alternative: a relational, reflexive, and socially situated praxis of public relations. This article invites scholars and practitioners to reconceive public relations not as a promotional and persuasive function, but as an anticipatory and co-creative force for public and social value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world of intersecting crises—climate, conflict, inequality—public relations finds itself in flux, facing situations without single or obvious solutions. This article proposes a metamodern workflow for public relations, one that embraces uncertainty, pluralism, and relational ethics. Drawing on recent conceptual work, we position generative AI not as a solutionist tool for efficiency, but as a provocation: a mirror of our sociotechnical condition and a medium for speculative, stakeholder-centric practice. The proposed genAI enhanced ‘what if’ workflow replaces deterministic ‘if-then’ logic models with reflective, scenario-based approaches, embedding deliberative temporality, stakeholder co-creation, and ethical humility into communication planning. This shift from managerial instrumentalist to stakeholder-centric thinking reclaims public relations as a site of societal value—not in opposition to organizational strategy, but as its reimagined core. This, we argue, enables public relations practitioners to become curators of complexity and facilitators of communitas: cultivating shared meaning across difference, rather than smoothing it over. Furthermore, we explore how genAI can support—but not substitute—this role, modeling possible futures and mapping divergent stakeholder positions. This metamodern orientation does not resolve paradoxes but inhabits them, oscillating between pragmatism and idealism, structure and fluidity. It critiques the legacy of commercial democracy and managerial instrumentalism while offering an alternative: a relational, reflexive, and socially situated praxis of public relations. This article invites scholars and practitioners to reconceive public relations not as a promotional and persuasive function, but as an anticipatory and co-creative force for public and social value.
多元危机的元现代公共关系工作流程:基于What If框架的传播研究与规划
在一个危机交织的世界里——气候、冲突、不平等——公共关系发现自己在不断变化,面临着没有单一或明显解决方案的情况。本文提出了一种包含不确定性、多元主义和关系伦理的元现代公共关系工作流程。根据最近的概念性工作,我们将生成式人工智能定位为一种挑衅,而不是一种提高效率的解决方案工具:我们社会技术条件的一面镜子,以及以利益相关者为中心的投机实践的媒介。拟议的基因人工智能增强了“如果”工作流,用反思的、基于场景的方法取代了确定性的“如果-那么”逻辑模型,将慎重的时间性、利益相关者共同创造和道德谦卑嵌入到沟通计划中。这种从管理工具主义到以利益相关者为中心的思维转变,重新确立了公共关系作为社会价值的场所的地位——不是与组织战略相对立,而是作为其重新构想的核心。我们认为,这使公共关系从业者能够成为复杂性的管理者和社区的促进者:培养跨越差异的共享意义,而不是使其平滑化。此外,我们探讨了genAI如何支持(而不是取代)这一角色,建模可能的未来并映射不同的利益相关者立场。这种元现代取向并没有解决矛盾,而是栖居其中,在实用主义与理想主义、结构与流动性之间摇摆。它批判了商业民主和管理工具主义的遗产,同时提供了另一种选择:一种关系的、反思的、社会定位的公共关系实践。本文邀请学者和实践者将公共关系视为一种公共和社会价值的预期和共同创造力量,而不是一种促进和说服功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信