Moon Hyun So , Soo-Bin Yang , Ji Eun Lee , Jeong Min Lee , Hwan Young Lee
{"title":"Independent validation of the VISAGE enhanced tool for age prediction in Koreans and analysis of platform transition","authors":"Moon Hyun So , Soo-Bin Yang , Ji Eun Lee , Jeong Min Lee , Hwan Young Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Age prediction based on DNA methylation is emerging as a pivotal topic in forensic genetics, providing crucial information for criminal investigations. The Europe-based VISible Attributes Through GEnomics (VISAGE) Consortium recently reported a series of age prediction models by analyzing blood, buccal cells, and bone DNA using the Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) method, demonstrating high prediction accuracy with Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) of less than 4 years. To explore population-specific differences, we replicated the VISAGE MPS-based analysis using 300 blood and 150 buccal cell DNA samples from Korean individuals. Since the VISAGE models' equations are not publicly available, we constructed new models using multiple linear regression at the same CpG sites. Despite differences in the ranking of age-correlated CpG markers, our newly developed blood age model for Koreans exhibited a comparable MAE (3.4 years) to the VISAGE blood model (MAE of 3.2 years), whereas our buccal cell model demonstrated a slightly higher MAE (4.3 years) compared to the VISAGE buccal cell model (MAE of 3.7 years). Furthermore, to facilitate broader application across platforms, we developed additional models using the SBE method and conducted a comparative analysis of methylation levels with those obtained by the MPS method. This comparison revealed significant inter-platform differences (<em>p-</em>value <0.05) in methylation levels across all CpG sites included in VISAGE blood and buccal cell models. To address this issue, we developed platform-independent models by calibrating methylation levels using 11 control DNAs with varying methylation ratios (0 %-100 %). Although the calibrated data still exhibited statistically significant differences between platforms, the platform-independent model for blood achieved high prediction accuracy, with an MAE of 3.6 years. However, the buccal cell model displayed lower accuracy and still showed inter-platform variations, indicating that the calibration method is affected differently by CpG sites. Additionally, we optimized age prediction models for Koreans by employing various regression methods to the Korean MPS dataset. Both blood and buccal cell models achieved high age prediction accuracies, with MAEs below 3.4 years and 4.2 years, respectively. In conclusion, our study underscores the importance of considering both biological and technical factors in developing reliable DNA methylation-based forensic models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 103346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497325001267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Age prediction based on DNA methylation is emerging as a pivotal topic in forensic genetics, providing crucial information for criminal investigations. The Europe-based VISible Attributes Through GEnomics (VISAGE) Consortium recently reported a series of age prediction models by analyzing blood, buccal cells, and bone DNA using the Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) method, demonstrating high prediction accuracy with Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) of less than 4 years. To explore population-specific differences, we replicated the VISAGE MPS-based analysis using 300 blood and 150 buccal cell DNA samples from Korean individuals. Since the VISAGE models' equations are not publicly available, we constructed new models using multiple linear regression at the same CpG sites. Despite differences in the ranking of age-correlated CpG markers, our newly developed blood age model for Koreans exhibited a comparable MAE (3.4 years) to the VISAGE blood model (MAE of 3.2 years), whereas our buccal cell model demonstrated a slightly higher MAE (4.3 years) compared to the VISAGE buccal cell model (MAE of 3.7 years). Furthermore, to facilitate broader application across platforms, we developed additional models using the SBE method and conducted a comparative analysis of methylation levels with those obtained by the MPS method. This comparison revealed significant inter-platform differences (p-value <0.05) in methylation levels across all CpG sites included in VISAGE blood and buccal cell models. To address this issue, we developed platform-independent models by calibrating methylation levels using 11 control DNAs with varying methylation ratios (0 %-100 %). Although the calibrated data still exhibited statistically significant differences between platforms, the platform-independent model for blood achieved high prediction accuracy, with an MAE of 3.6 years. However, the buccal cell model displayed lower accuracy and still showed inter-platform variations, indicating that the calibration method is affected differently by CpG sites. Additionally, we optimized age prediction models for Koreans by employing various regression methods to the Korean MPS dataset. Both blood and buccal cell models achieved high age prediction accuracies, with MAEs below 3.4 years and 4.2 years, respectively. In conclusion, our study underscores the importance of considering both biological and technical factors in developing reliable DNA methylation-based forensic models.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.