Jack G. Rayner, Samantha L. Bock, Andrew J. Lonski, Nicole C. Riddle, Gerald S. Wilkinson
{"title":"Sex differences in DNA methylation in bats","authors":"Jack G. Rayner, Samantha L. Bock, Andrew J. Lonski, Nicole C. Riddle, Gerald S. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sex-biased longevity is observed across a wide range of animal taxa, including bats, for reasons not well understood. Patterns of cytosine methylation vary predictably with age in many organisms, offering a valuable means to investigate differences in patterns of aging at the molecular level. We tested sex differences in cytosine methylation across 14 bat species and compared patterns of age-associated variation. Sex differences were overrepresented on the X chromosome, showing a strong pattern of female hypermethylation within promoter regions. Sex- and age-associated differences in methylation were nonrandomly distributed with respect to proximity to putative sex hormone receptor binding sites, with sites hypermethylated in males and females tending to be underrepresented near androgen and estrogen receptor binding sites, respectively. Across species, we observed that the relative steepness of male versus female slopes of age-associated variation appeared to be associated with the strength of precopulatory sexual selection, with especially strong trends toward male-biased age-associated slopes in two harem-polygynous species that exhibit female-biased longevity. Our results offer insights into how patterns of methylation differ across sexes and ages, and raise intriguing questions for future research, such as whether sex differences in molecular aging reflect sex-biased longevity, for which records in bats are sparse.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1551 1","pages":"115-128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sex-biased longevity is observed across a wide range of animal taxa, including bats, for reasons not well understood. Patterns of cytosine methylation vary predictably with age in many organisms, offering a valuable means to investigate differences in patterns of aging at the molecular level. We tested sex differences in cytosine methylation across 14 bat species and compared patterns of age-associated variation. Sex differences were overrepresented on the X chromosome, showing a strong pattern of female hypermethylation within promoter regions. Sex- and age-associated differences in methylation were nonrandomly distributed with respect to proximity to putative sex hormone receptor binding sites, with sites hypermethylated in males and females tending to be underrepresented near androgen and estrogen receptor binding sites, respectively. Across species, we observed that the relative steepness of male versus female slopes of age-associated variation appeared to be associated with the strength of precopulatory sexual selection, with especially strong trends toward male-biased age-associated slopes in two harem-polygynous species that exhibit female-biased longevity. Our results offer insights into how patterns of methylation differ across sexes and ages, and raise intriguing questions for future research, such as whether sex differences in molecular aging reflect sex-biased longevity, for which records in bats are sparse.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.