Urban greening with biodiverse perennial meadows improves ecosystem services in human dominated landscapes

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Shishir Paudel , Sarah L. States , Kumar Mainali
{"title":"Urban greening with biodiverse perennial meadows improves ecosystem services in human dominated landscapes","authors":"Shishir Paudel ,&nbsp;Sarah L. States ,&nbsp;Kumar Mainali","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In urban landscapes, diverse perennial native meadows have widely been proposed as alternatives to traditional lawns, offering multiple ecosystem services. However, their comparative value for sustainable ecosystem services remains poorly understood. Using multiyear systematic field sampling, we compared plant species richness and diversity, soil nutrients, microbial functional groups, and trace metals between urban lawns and meadows. Results showed higher plant species richness and diversity in meadows, which enhances biodiversity conservation by providing improved habitats and resources for urban wildlife. Lawns showed higher soil organic matter, total carbon (C), and nitrogen (N), suggesting carbon sequestration potential. However, meadow soils had higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratios and lower plant available N, implying efficient N utilization and potential for reduced leaching into groundwater. Additionally, meadows contained lower plant available phosphorus, potassium, and certain trace metals, demonstrating their ability to reduce the pollutants from leaching into the ground or surface water. Moreover, meadows showed higher arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi abundance and fungal-to-bacterial ratios, indicating enhanced soil health potential (e.g., nutrient cycling and soil structure). Overall, urban lawns can sequester greenhouse gases, while meadows support biodiversity, may act as natural filters for excessive nutrients and pollutants, and improve soil health. Our findings provide some evidence that scaling up urban meadows as a multifunctional green infrastructure strategy may preserve biodiversity and maximize ecological and environmental benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129014"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In urban landscapes, diverse perennial native meadows have widely been proposed as alternatives to traditional lawns, offering multiple ecosystem services. However, their comparative value for sustainable ecosystem services remains poorly understood. Using multiyear systematic field sampling, we compared plant species richness and diversity, soil nutrients, microbial functional groups, and trace metals between urban lawns and meadows. Results showed higher plant species richness and diversity in meadows, which enhances biodiversity conservation by providing improved habitats and resources for urban wildlife. Lawns showed higher soil organic matter, total carbon (C), and nitrogen (N), suggesting carbon sequestration potential. However, meadow soils had higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratios and lower plant available N, implying efficient N utilization and potential for reduced leaching into groundwater. Additionally, meadows contained lower plant available phosphorus, potassium, and certain trace metals, demonstrating their ability to reduce the pollutants from leaching into the ground or surface water. Moreover, meadows showed higher arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi abundance and fungal-to-bacterial ratios, indicating enhanced soil health potential (e.g., nutrient cycling and soil structure). Overall, urban lawns can sequester greenhouse gases, while meadows support biodiversity, may act as natural filters for excessive nutrients and pollutants, and improve soil health. Our findings provide some evidence that scaling up urban meadows as a multifunctional green infrastructure strategy may preserve biodiversity and maximize ecological and environmental benefits.
多年生草甸城市绿化改善人类主导景观的生态系统服务
在城市景观中,多种多年生原生草甸被广泛提出作为传统草坪的替代品,提供多种生态系统服务。然而,它们对可持续生态系统服务的相对价值仍然知之甚少。通过多年系统的野外采样,我们比较了城市草坪和草甸之间的植物物种丰富度、土壤养分、微生物功能群和微量金属。结果表明,草甸植物物种多样性较高,为城市野生动物提供了良好的生境和资源,加强了生物多样性保护。草地土壤有机质、总碳(C)和氮(N)含量较高,具有固碳潜力。然而,草甸土壤碳氮比较高,植物有效氮较低,这意味着氮的有效利用和减少地下水淋滤的潜力。此外,草甸含有较低的植物有效磷、钾和某些微量金属,表明它们有能力减少污染物从土壤或地表水中浸出。此外,草甸显示出更高的菌根真菌丰度和真菌细菌比,表明土壤健康潜力增强(如养分循环和土壤结构)。总体而言,城市草坪可以隔离温室气体,而草甸则支持生物多样性,可以作为过度营养物质和污染物的天然过滤器,并改善土壤健康。我们的研究结果提供了一些证据,证明扩大城市草甸作为多功能绿色基础设施战略可以保护生物多样性并最大化生态和环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信