{"title":"Looking beyond lambda","authors":"Alexie Leauthaud, Adam Riess","doi":"10.1038/s41550-025-02627-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Widening cracks are appearing in the Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model (where Λ is the cosmological constant) and it is becoming increasingly clear that the standard cosmological model struggles to describe the full expansion history of the Universe as revealed by the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, and locally calibrated type Ia supernovae. Taken at face value, recent results suggest a dark sector that may be more complex than commonly assumed. We must prepare for the possibility of moving beyond the ΛCDM era, where merely testing if the dark energy equation of state w = −1 is no longer sufficient, and embrace the challenge of unravelling the physics of dark matter, dark energy and gravity on cosmic scales. Guided by increasingly robust data—secured through considerable investment—we should pursue deeper understanding while being open to complexity in the dark sector, rather than settling for the simplest phenomenology. Data from new facilities and a new Dark Energy Task Force could help illuminate the path forward while changes to our scientific practices will be essential to navigate the potentially rocky road ahead. The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Survey’s latest results indicate a tension between observations and the cosmological constant model of dark energy. This Perspective puts these findings in context and suggests a way forward for dark energy research.","PeriodicalId":18778,"journal":{"name":"Nature Astronomy","volume":"9 8","pages":"1123-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-025-02627-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Widening cracks are appearing in the Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model (where Λ is the cosmological constant) and it is becoming increasingly clear that the standard cosmological model struggles to describe the full expansion history of the Universe as revealed by the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, and locally calibrated type Ia supernovae. Taken at face value, recent results suggest a dark sector that may be more complex than commonly assumed. We must prepare for the possibility of moving beyond the ΛCDM era, where merely testing if the dark energy equation of state w = −1 is no longer sufficient, and embrace the challenge of unravelling the physics of dark matter, dark energy and gravity on cosmic scales. Guided by increasingly robust data—secured through considerable investment—we should pursue deeper understanding while being open to complexity in the dark sector, rather than settling for the simplest phenomenology. Data from new facilities and a new Dark Energy Task Force could help illuminate the path forward while changes to our scientific practices will be essential to navigate the potentially rocky road ahead. The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Survey’s latest results indicate a tension between observations and the cosmological constant model of dark energy. This Perspective puts these findings in context and suggests a way forward for dark energy research.
Nature AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy-Astronomy and Astrophysics
CiteScore
19.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
252
期刊介绍:
Nature Astronomy, the oldest science, has played a significant role in the history of Nature. Throughout the years, pioneering discoveries such as the first quasar, exoplanet, and understanding of spiral nebulae have been reported in the journal. With the introduction of Nature Astronomy, the field now receives expanded coverage, welcoming research in astronomy, astrophysics, and planetary science. The primary objective is to encourage closer collaboration among researchers in these related areas.
Similar to other journals under the Nature brand, Nature Astronomy boasts a devoted team of professional editors, ensuring fairness and rigorous peer-review processes. The journal maintains high standards in copy-editing and production, ensuring timely publication and editorial independence.
In addition to original research, Nature Astronomy publishes a wide range of content, including Comments, Reviews, News and Views, Features, and Correspondence. This diverse collection covers various disciplines within astronomy and includes contributions from a diverse range of voices.