Ramin Moghadasi , Sajjad Foroughi , Sepideh Goodarzi , Yihuai Zhang , Branko Bijeljic , Martin J. Blunt , Auli Niemi
{"title":"Trapping and remobilization during geological CO2 storage: A pore-scale imaging and modeling study","authors":"Ramin Moghadasi , Sajjad Foroughi , Sepideh Goodarzi , Yihuai Zhang , Branko Bijeljic , Martin J. Blunt , Auli Niemi","doi":"10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>CO<sub>2</sub> storage in geological formations is important in the reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Residual trapping – CO<sub>2</sub> immobilized by capillary forces – contributes significantly to the overall storage. Earlier findings at field conditions have indicated a delayed remobilization – a safety enhancing phenomenon – of residually trapped CO<sub>2</sub> under pressure depletion. The present study investigates the underlying processes of this phenomenon by means of detailed pore-level analysis. We first compare our pore network model predictions against experimental data from high-resolution 3D X-ray imaging. General agreement is found, and in both the experiment and the model, remobilization occurs at a higher saturation value – called the critical saturation (<em>S<sub>gc</sub></em>) – than the residual saturation (<em>S<sub>gr</sub></em>). A significant reduction in the relative permeability of the gas is also predicted. The model is then applied to different rocks. The results show that the <em>S<sub>gc</sub></em> is not a simple function of porosity, permeability or residual saturation. Instead, complex pore scale phenomena related to pore connectivity govern the behavior and case-specific studies are required to determine the exact value. For practical purposes, the difference between residual saturation and critical saturation is approximately between 2–4%. The reduction in gas relative permeability varies between 60–90 % compared to that for drainage with no expansion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7614,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Water Resources","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 105092"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Water Resources","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309170825002064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CO2 storage in geological formations is important in the reduction of CO2 emissions. Residual trapping – CO2 immobilized by capillary forces – contributes significantly to the overall storage. Earlier findings at field conditions have indicated a delayed remobilization – a safety enhancing phenomenon – of residually trapped CO2 under pressure depletion. The present study investigates the underlying processes of this phenomenon by means of detailed pore-level analysis. We first compare our pore network model predictions against experimental data from high-resolution 3D X-ray imaging. General agreement is found, and in both the experiment and the model, remobilization occurs at a higher saturation value – called the critical saturation (Sgc) – than the residual saturation (Sgr). A significant reduction in the relative permeability of the gas is also predicted. The model is then applied to different rocks. The results show that the Sgc is not a simple function of porosity, permeability or residual saturation. Instead, complex pore scale phenomena related to pore connectivity govern the behavior and case-specific studies are required to determine the exact value. For practical purposes, the difference between residual saturation and critical saturation is approximately between 2–4%. The reduction in gas relative permeability varies between 60–90 % compared to that for drainage with no expansion.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Water Resources provides a forum for the presentation of fundamental scientific advances in the understanding of water resources systems. The scope of Advances in Water Resources includes any combination of theoretical, computational, and experimental approaches used to advance fundamental understanding of surface or subsurface water resources systems or the interaction of these systems with the atmosphere, geosphere, biosphere, and human societies. Manuscripts involving case studies that do not attempt to reach broader conclusions, research on engineering design, applied hydraulics, or water quality and treatment, as well as applications of existing knowledge that do not advance fundamental understanding of hydrological processes, are not appropriate for Advances in Water Resources.
Examples of appropriate topical areas that will be considered include the following:
• Surface and subsurface hydrology
• Hydrometeorology
• Environmental fluid dynamics
• Ecohydrology and ecohydrodynamics
• Multiphase transport phenomena in porous media
• Fluid flow and species transport and reaction processes