{"title":"Personalized interventions","authors":"Ingo Zettler , Cecilie Fenja Strandsbjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Personality science appears to be entering a new era centered on personalized interventions. These are designed by initiators so as to align intervention features with characteristics of the targeted recipient, with the aim of increasing intervention effectiveness. The recent rapid and widespread adoption of personalized interventions has been largely driven by technological advancements that facilitate the collection and inference of individual-level information (e.g., via passively collected or automatically generated data), as well as the development (e.g., through AI-based conversational agents) and large-scale dissemination (e.g., via push notifications) of personalized interventions. Herein, we provide a brief overview of current knowledge on personalized psychological interventions, highlighting key conceptual, empirical, and ethical aspects. Conceptually, researchers and practitioners might adapt features concerning the intervention initiator, the targeted recipient, the message, and/or the context of delivery. Empirically, personalized interventions have shown effectiveness across domains such as consumer marketing, education, financial behavior, health, and politics. Ethically, concerns remain—particularly regarding the reliability and validity of inferred characteristics from digital trace data, and the extent to which individuals can provide truly informed consent. Expecting that research on personalized interventions will do nothing but grow substantially in the coming years, we conclude with a call to design, conduct, and report studies in ways that support the accumulation of theoretically grounded and reliable knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102147"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Personality science appears to be entering a new era centered on personalized interventions. These are designed by initiators so as to align intervention features with characteristics of the targeted recipient, with the aim of increasing intervention effectiveness. The recent rapid and widespread adoption of personalized interventions has been largely driven by technological advancements that facilitate the collection and inference of individual-level information (e.g., via passively collected or automatically generated data), as well as the development (e.g., through AI-based conversational agents) and large-scale dissemination (e.g., via push notifications) of personalized interventions. Herein, we provide a brief overview of current knowledge on personalized psychological interventions, highlighting key conceptual, empirical, and ethical aspects. Conceptually, researchers and practitioners might adapt features concerning the intervention initiator, the targeted recipient, the message, and/or the context of delivery. Empirically, personalized interventions have shown effectiveness across domains such as consumer marketing, education, financial behavior, health, and politics. Ethically, concerns remain—particularly regarding the reliability and validity of inferred characteristics from digital trace data, and the extent to which individuals can provide truly informed consent. Expecting that research on personalized interventions will do nothing but grow substantially in the coming years, we conclude with a call to design, conduct, and report studies in ways that support the accumulation of theoretically grounded and reliable knowledge.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology