Personalized interventions

IF 6.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ingo Zettler , Cecilie Fenja Strandsbjerg
{"title":"Personalized interventions","authors":"Ingo Zettler ,&nbsp;Cecilie Fenja Strandsbjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Personality science appears to be entering a new era centered on personalized interventions. These are designed by initiators so as to align intervention features with characteristics of the targeted recipient, with the aim of increasing intervention effectiveness. The recent rapid and widespread adoption of personalized interventions has been largely driven by technological advancements that facilitate the collection and inference of individual-level information (e.g., via passively collected or automatically generated data), as well as the development (e.g., through AI-based conversational agents) and large-scale dissemination (e.g., via push notifications) of personalized interventions. Herein, we provide a brief overview of current knowledge on personalized psychological interventions, highlighting key conceptual, empirical, and ethical aspects. Conceptually, researchers and practitioners might adapt features concerning the intervention initiator, the targeted recipient, the message, and/or the context of delivery. Empirically, personalized interventions have shown effectiveness across domains such as consumer marketing, education, financial behavior, health, and politics. Ethically, concerns remain—particularly regarding the reliability and validity of inferred characteristics from digital trace data, and the extent to which individuals can provide truly informed consent. Expecting that research on personalized interventions will do nothing but grow substantially in the coming years, we conclude with a call to design, conduct, and report studies in ways that support the accumulation of theoretically grounded and reliable knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102147"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personality science appears to be entering a new era centered on personalized interventions. These are designed by initiators so as to align intervention features with characteristics of the targeted recipient, with the aim of increasing intervention effectiveness. The recent rapid and widespread adoption of personalized interventions has been largely driven by technological advancements that facilitate the collection and inference of individual-level information (e.g., via passively collected or automatically generated data), as well as the development (e.g., through AI-based conversational agents) and large-scale dissemination (e.g., via push notifications) of personalized interventions. Herein, we provide a brief overview of current knowledge on personalized psychological interventions, highlighting key conceptual, empirical, and ethical aspects. Conceptually, researchers and practitioners might adapt features concerning the intervention initiator, the targeted recipient, the message, and/or the context of delivery. Empirically, personalized interventions have shown effectiveness across domains such as consumer marketing, education, financial behavior, health, and politics. Ethically, concerns remain—particularly regarding the reliability and validity of inferred characteristics from digital trace data, and the extent to which individuals can provide truly informed consent. Expecting that research on personalized interventions will do nothing but grow substantially in the coming years, we conclude with a call to design, conduct, and report studies in ways that support the accumulation of theoretically grounded and reliable knowledge.
个性化的干预措施
人格科学似乎正在进入一个以个性化干预为中心的新时代。这些是由发起者设计的,目的是使干预特征与目标接受者的特征相一致,以提高干预效果。最近个性化干预措施的迅速和广泛采用在很大程度上是由技术进步推动的,这些技术进步促进了个人层面信息的收集和推断(例如,通过被动收集或自动生成的数据),以及个性化干预措施的开发(例如,通过基于人工智能的对话代理)和大规模传播(例如,通过推送通知)。在此,我们简要概述了个性化心理干预的当前知识,突出了关键的概念、经验和伦理方面。从概念上讲,研究人员和从业者可能会调整干预发起者、目标接受者、信息和/或传递上下文的特征。经验表明,个性化干预在消费者营销、教育、金融行为、健康和政治等领域都显示出有效性。伦理方面的担忧仍然存在,特别是关于从数字追踪数据推断特征的可靠性和有效性,以及个人能够提供真正知情同意的程度。预计个性化干预的研究将在未来几年大幅增长,我们呼吁以支持理论基础和可靠知识积累的方式设计、实施和报告研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信