Inequalities in Preterm Birth in England: A Retrospective National Cohort Study Focusing on Deprivation and Ethnicity, Using Routinely Collected Maternity Hospital Data

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Iona Hindes, Buthaina Ibrahim, Jennifer Jardine, Dominik Zenner, Stamatina Iliodromiti
{"title":"Inequalities in Preterm Birth in England: A Retrospective National Cohort Study Focusing on Deprivation and Ethnicity, Using Routinely Collected Maternity Hospital Data","authors":"Iona Hindes,&nbsp;Buthaina Ibrahim,&nbsp;Jennifer Jardine,&nbsp;Dominik Zenner,&nbsp;Stamatina Iliodromiti","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To quantify the interplay between socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in preterm birth rates in England from 2018 to 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study using electronic health data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>English hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>1537 595 women aged 13–55 with a singleton livebirth (April 2018–March 2021) at 24–42 gestational weeks were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multivariate Poisson regression was used to estimate the rate of preterm birth in each ethnic and deprivation group, adjusted rate ratios between groups, and associations. A post hoc calculation identified the rate of preterm birth for each ethnic group at each level of deprivation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Preterm birth (birth at less than 37 gestational weeks).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The rate of preterm birth was 6.30% (95% CI: 6.22–6.37) in women living in the most deprived areas, compared to a rate of 5.05% (95% CI: 4.96–5.14) among women in the least deprived areas. White women had a preterm birth rate of 5.74% (95% CI: 5.70–5.78), whereas South Asian and Black women had higher rates of preterm birth at 6.09% (95% CI: 5.98–6.21) and 5.89% (95% CI: 5.70–6.09), respectively. Deprivation interacted with ethnicity and attenuated the differences in the rate of preterm birth across all ethnicity groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In areas of high deprivation, preterm birth rates were similar across ethnicity groups, whereas in the least deprived areas, South Asian and Black women had higher rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Deprivation and ethnicity remain key drivers of inequalities in preterm birth. Prevention strategies need to address socioenvironmental and structural determinants of preterm birth in areas of high deprivation and minority ethnicity groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 12","pages":"1866-1874"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18331","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18331","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To quantify the interplay between socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in preterm birth rates in England from 2018 to 2021.

Design

A retrospective cohort study using electronic health data.

Setting

English hospitals.

Population

1537 595 women aged 13–55 with a singleton livebirth (April 2018–March 2021) at 24–42 gestational weeks were included.

Methods

Multivariate Poisson regression was used to estimate the rate of preterm birth in each ethnic and deprivation group, adjusted rate ratios between groups, and associations. A post hoc calculation identified the rate of preterm birth for each ethnic group at each level of deprivation.

Main Outcome Measures

Preterm birth (birth at less than 37 gestational weeks).

Results

The rate of preterm birth was 6.30% (95% CI: 6.22–6.37) in women living in the most deprived areas, compared to a rate of 5.05% (95% CI: 4.96–5.14) among women in the least deprived areas. White women had a preterm birth rate of 5.74% (95% CI: 5.70–5.78), whereas South Asian and Black women had higher rates of preterm birth at 6.09% (95% CI: 5.98–6.21) and 5.89% (95% CI: 5.70–6.09), respectively. Deprivation interacted with ethnicity and attenuated the differences in the rate of preterm birth across all ethnicity groups (p < 0.001). In areas of high deprivation, preterm birth rates were similar across ethnicity groups, whereas in the least deprived areas, South Asian and Black women had higher rates.

Conclusion

Deprivation and ethnicity remain key drivers of inequalities in preterm birth. Prevention strategies need to address socioenvironmental and structural determinants of preterm birth in areas of high deprivation and minority ethnicity groups.

Abstract Image

英国早产的不平等:一项关注剥夺和种族的回顾性国家队列研究,使用常规收集的妇产医院数据
目的量化2018 - 2021年英国社会经济和种族不平等对早产率的影响。设计:采用电子健康数据进行回顾性队列研究。SettingEnglish医院。1537595名年龄在13-55岁、单胎活产(2018年4月- 2021年3月)、孕周为24-42周的女性被纳入研究。方法采用多变量泊松回归估计各种族和贫困组的早产率、调整组间比率和相关性。一项事后计算确定了每个种族在每个贫困程度下的早产率。主要观察指标:早产(少于37孕周)。结果最贫困地区妇女早产率为6.30% (95% CI: 6.22 ~ 6.37),而最贫困地区妇女早产率为5.05% (95% CI: 4.96 ~ 5.14)。白人妇女的早产率为5.74% (95% CI: 5.70-5.78),而南亚和黑人妇女的早产率更高,分别为6.09% (95% CI: 5.98-6.21)和5.89% (95% CI: 5.70-6.09)。贫困与种族相互作用,并减弱了所有种族间早产率的差异(p < 0.001)。在贫困程度较高的地区,不同种族的早产率相似,而在贫困程度最低的地区,南亚和黑人妇女的早产率更高。贫困和种族仍然是早产不平等的主要驱动因素。预防战略需要解决高贫困地区和少数族裔群体早产的社会环境和结构决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信