Development and Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Set Target IOP for Glaucoma

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alex Pham , Edgar Robitaille , Chris Bradley , Joshua de Souza , Jithin Yohannan
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Set Target IOP for Glaucoma","authors":"Alex Pham ,&nbsp;Edgar Robitaille ,&nbsp;Chris Bradley ,&nbsp;Joshua de Souza ,&nbsp;Jithin Yohannan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.08.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict a personalized target intraocular pressure (IOP) for eyes with glaucoma. Compare the impact of achieving the AI-predicted, clinician-defined, and society guideline-based target IOP on rates of visual field (VF) worsening.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Development and evaluation of an AI treatment algorithm</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>A dataset of 14,871 eyes with a defined target IOP (set by glaucoma specialists during routine clinical care) and baseline OCT, VF, and clinical measurements. A non-overlapping progression dataset of 10,559 eyes with longitudinal VF testing (≥ 5 reliable tests).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We trained and tested a machine-learning model on the dataset of eyes with baseline structural, functional, and clinical data to predict a target IOP for each eye in the progression dataset. Linear models estimated the effect of mean target difference (measured IOP – target IOP) on the rate of VF worsening, defined by mean deviation (MD) slope. The effect of deviations from AI targets was compared to deviations from clinician-set targets and targets from society-based guidelines by the Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS). Linear models also estimated the effect of mean absolute IOP on the rate of VF worsening. The effect of mean target difference (AI, clinician, or COS) was compared to the effect of mean absolute IOP.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Effect of 1 mm Hg increase in mean target difference (AI, clinician, or COS) on the rate of MD worsening (dB/year).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AI model achieved a mean absolute error of 2.28 mm Hg for predicting target IOP. AI and clinician target differences had similar effects on VF outcomes (0.032 dB/year vs 0.026 dB/year faster rate of MD worsening per 1 mm Hg increase, respectively, <em>p</em> = 0.09). AI and clinician target difference had greater effects than COS target difference (0.011 dB/year faster per 1 mm Hg increase, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and mean absolute IOP (0.001 dB/year faster per 1 mm Hg increase, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI models can set target IOP with comparable performance to glaucoma specialists and are superior to utilizing mean IOP or society-based guidelines to set targets. Further work is needed to assess the clinical impact of AI-based target IOP guidance for patients managed by non-glaucoma specialists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"280 ","pages":"Pages 423-435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425004623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict a personalized target intraocular pressure (IOP) for eyes with glaucoma. Compare the impact of achieving the AI-predicted, clinician-defined, and society guideline-based target IOP on rates of visual field (VF) worsening.

Design

Development and evaluation of an AI treatment algorithm

Subjects

A dataset of 14,871 eyes with a defined target IOP (set by glaucoma specialists during routine clinical care) and baseline OCT, VF, and clinical measurements. A non-overlapping progression dataset of 10,559 eyes with longitudinal VF testing (≥ 5 reliable tests).

Methods

We trained and tested a machine-learning model on the dataset of eyes with baseline structural, functional, and clinical data to predict a target IOP for each eye in the progression dataset. Linear models estimated the effect of mean target difference (measured IOP – target IOP) on the rate of VF worsening, defined by mean deviation (MD) slope. The effect of deviations from AI targets was compared to deviations from clinician-set targets and targets from society-based guidelines by the Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS). Linear models also estimated the effect of mean absolute IOP on the rate of VF worsening. The effect of mean target difference (AI, clinician, or COS) was compared to the effect of mean absolute IOP.

Main outcome measures

Effect of 1 mm Hg increase in mean target difference (AI, clinician, or COS) on the rate of MD worsening (dB/year).

Results

The AI model achieved a mean absolute error of 2.28 mm Hg for predicting target IOP. AI and clinician target differences had similar effects on VF outcomes (0.032 dB/year vs 0.026 dB/year faster rate of MD worsening per 1 mm Hg increase, respectively, p = 0.09). AI and clinician target difference had greater effects than COS target difference (0.011 dB/year faster per 1 mm Hg increase, p < 0.001) and mean absolute IOP (0.001 dB/year faster per 1 mm Hg increase, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

AI models can set target IOP with comparable performance to glaucoma specialists and are superior to utilizing mean IOP or society-based guidelines to set targets. Further work is needed to assess the clinical impact of AI-based target IOP guidance for patients managed by non-glaucoma specialists.
青光眼目标眼压人工智能模型的开发与评价
开发人工智能(AI)模型,预测青光眼的个性化目标眼压(IOP)。比较实现人工智能预测、临床定义和基于社会指南的目标IOP对视野恶化率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信