David J Sher, Vladimir Avkshtol, Mu-Han Lin, Jing Wang, Liyuan Chen, Chien-Yi Liao, Randall Hughes, Sean Domal, Chul Ahn, Dominic Moon
{"title":"Impact of daily adaptive head and neck radiotherapy on toxicity and quality-of-life: results of the DARTBOARD phase II randomized trial","authors":"David J Sher, Vladimir Avkshtol, Mu-Han Lin, Jing Wang, Liyuan Chen, Chien-Yi Liao, Randall Hughes, Sean Domal, Chul Ahn, Dominic Moon","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The utility of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poorly defined. Daily ART (DART) promises both anatomic adaptation and planning target volume (PTV) reduction. In this prospective trial using cone-beam computed tomography-based ART, patients with HNSCC undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were randomized to DART with reduced PTV margins or no ART with standard margins (image-guided RT [IGRT]). Methods Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx HNSCC receiving definitive radiotherapy. All individuals received involved nodal radiotherapy per previous institutional study. The PTV margins were 1 mm (2 mm craniocaudal) versus 5 mm in the DART and IGRT arms, respectively. The primary endpoint was patient-reported xerostomia at one year, assessed with the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). Results Fifty patients were enrolled (26 IGRT, 24 DART) between March 2022 and June 2023. The cohort consisted of 38 oropharynx and 12 larynx/hypopharynx patients. The mean ipsilateral parotid gland, ipsilateral and contralateral submandibular gland doses were significantly lower with DART. There was significantly less acute dermatitis in the DART arm (Grade 0/1/2 0%/69%/31% vs. 17%/75%/8% DART, p = 0.01) but no significant difference in any patient-reported outcome at one year. The adjusted difference in XQ score at one year was 10.0 (95% CI -4.7-24.7, p = 0.58). Conclusion Online DART for HNSCC is oncologically sound and improved acute toxicity profiles, but it did not reduce patient-reported xerostomia, the primary endpoint. Additional evidence is needed to understand the potential benefits and limitations of this paradigm, including its cost-effectiveness. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT04883281","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background The utility of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poorly defined. Daily ART (DART) promises both anatomic adaptation and planning target volume (PTV) reduction. In this prospective trial using cone-beam computed tomography-based ART, patients with HNSCC undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were randomized to DART with reduced PTV margins or no ART with standard margins (image-guided RT [IGRT]). Methods Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx HNSCC receiving definitive radiotherapy. All individuals received involved nodal radiotherapy per previous institutional study. The PTV margins were 1 mm (2 mm craniocaudal) versus 5 mm in the DART and IGRT arms, respectively. The primary endpoint was patient-reported xerostomia at one year, assessed with the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). Results Fifty patients were enrolled (26 IGRT, 24 DART) between March 2022 and June 2023. The cohort consisted of 38 oropharynx and 12 larynx/hypopharynx patients. The mean ipsilateral parotid gland, ipsilateral and contralateral submandibular gland doses were significantly lower with DART. There was significantly less acute dermatitis in the DART arm (Grade 0/1/2 0%/69%/31% vs. 17%/75%/8% DART, p = 0.01) but no significant difference in any patient-reported outcome at one year. The adjusted difference in XQ score at one year was 10.0 (95% CI -4.7-24.7, p = 0.58). Conclusion Online DART for HNSCC is oncologically sound and improved acute toxicity profiles, but it did not reduce patient-reported xerostomia, the primary endpoint. Additional evidence is needed to understand the potential benefits and limitations of this paradigm, including its cost-effectiveness. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT04883281
背景适应性放疗(ART)治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的应用仍不明确。每日ART (DART)承诺解剖适应和计划靶体积(PTV)减少。在这项使用锥形束计算机断层扫描为基础的ART的前瞻性试验中,接受最终放疗(RT)或放化疗(CRT)的HNSCC患者被随机分配到PTV边缘缩小的DART或没有PTV边缘标准的ART(图像引导RT [IGRT])。方法入选标准包括诊断为口咽部、喉部或下咽的HNSCC接受明确放疗。根据先前的机构研究,所有患者均接受了淋巴结放射治疗。PTV边缘在DART和IGRT组分别为1mm(颅侧2mm)和5mm。主要终点是患者报告的一年内口干,用口干问卷(XQ)进行评估。结果在2022年3月至2023年6月期间入组了50例患者(26例IGRT, 24例DART)。该队列包括38名口咽部患者和12名喉/下咽患者。与DART相比,同侧腮腺、同侧和对侧颌下腺的平均剂量明显降低。DART组的急性皮炎明显减少(0/1/2级0%/69%/31% vs. 17%/75%/8% DART, p = 0.01),但一年后任何患者报告的结果均无显著差异。一年后XQ评分调整差值为10.0 (95% CI -4.7 ~ 24.7, p = 0.58)。结论在线DART治疗HNSCC在肿瘤学上是合理的,并且改善了急性毒性,但它并没有减少患者报告的主要终点口干症。需要更多的证据来了解这种模式的潜在益处和局限性,包括其成本效益。临床试验。gov识别码,NCT04883281