Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in a Mining City: Multi‐Scenario Comparison of Ecological Restoration

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Danfei Zhong, Jian Peng, Dongmei Xu, Hui Tang, Hong Jiang, Tao Hu, Yanmin Yang, Jiansheng Wu
{"title":"Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in a Mining City: Multi‐Scenario Comparison of Ecological Restoration","authors":"Danfei Zhong, Jian Peng, Dongmei Xu, Hui Tang, Hong Jiang, Tao Hu, Yanmin Yang, Jiansheng Wu","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, the rapid emergence of the post‐mining era has enhanced the urgency of ecological restoration in mining areas, making it a critical global priority. Ecological security pattern (ESP), a cost‐effective approach for ecological restoration, has seen limited comparative studies on multi‐scenario ecological restoration strategies across its optimization. To fill this gap, Datong, a typical mineral resource‐intensive city in China, was selected as the study area for conducting multi‐scenario ecological restoration simulations. Based on ESP construction and optimization, we adopted four scenarios: large‐area, high‐density, near‐source, and near‐corridor priority scenarios for restoring the mining areas, and compared the restoration effects by examining landscape components, ecosystem services, and landscape connectivity to identify the most cost‐effective strategy. The results demonstrated that the ESP consisted of 43 ecological sources and 41 ecological corridors, with a total area of 4,663.04 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> in total, accounting for 33.09% of the study area. Notably, 44.25% of the mining areas existed within the ESP 100 m buffer zone, posing a serious threat to regional ecological security. Among these scenarios, the near‐source priority scenario was the optimal restoration scenario, demonstrating superior results in decreasing ESP fragmentation (15.29%), enhancing ecosystem services (232.40%), and improving landscape connectivity (79.22%). This study presents a multi‐scenario ESP optimization approach for ecological restoration in mining areas, which supports the assurance of ecological security and sustainable development in mineral resource‐intensive cities.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, the rapid emergence of the post‐mining era has enhanced the urgency of ecological restoration in mining areas, making it a critical global priority. Ecological security pattern (ESP), a cost‐effective approach for ecological restoration, has seen limited comparative studies on multi‐scenario ecological restoration strategies across its optimization. To fill this gap, Datong, a typical mineral resource‐intensive city in China, was selected as the study area for conducting multi‐scenario ecological restoration simulations. Based on ESP construction and optimization, we adopted four scenarios: large‐area, high‐density, near‐source, and near‐corridor priority scenarios for restoring the mining areas, and compared the restoration effects by examining landscape components, ecosystem services, and landscape connectivity to identify the most cost‐effective strategy. The results demonstrated that the ESP consisted of 43 ecological sources and 41 ecological corridors, with a total area of 4,663.04 km2 in total, accounting for 33.09% of the study area. Notably, 44.25% of the mining areas existed within the ESP 100 m buffer zone, posing a serious threat to regional ecological security. Among these scenarios, the near‐source priority scenario was the optimal restoration scenario, demonstrating superior results in decreasing ESP fragmentation (15.29%), enhancing ecosystem services (232.40%), and improving landscape connectivity (79.22%). This study presents a multi‐scenario ESP optimization approach for ecological restoration in mining areas, which supports the assurance of ecological security and sustainable development in mineral resource‐intensive cities.
矿业城市生态安全格局优化:生态恢复的多情景比较
在联合国生态系统恢复十年期间,后采矿时代的迅速出现增加了矿区生态恢复的紧迫性,使其成为一个关键的全球优先事项。生态安全模式作为一种经济有效的生态修复方法,在多情景生态修复策略优化方面的比较研究较少。为了填补这一空白,本文选择中国典型的矿产资源密集型城市大同作为研究区,进行了多情景生态恢复模拟。基于ESP的构建与优化,采用大面积、高密度、近源、近廊道4种优先场景进行矿区恢复,并从景观组成、生态系统服务和景观连通性等方面对恢复效果进行比较,以确定最具成本效益的恢复策略。结果表明:ESP由43个生态源和41个生态廊道组成,总面积为4663.04 km2,占研究面积的33.09%;其中,44.25%的矿区位于ESP 100 m缓冲带内,对区域生态安全构成严重威胁。其中,近源优先恢复方案是最优恢复方案,在减少ESP破碎化(15.29%)、增强生态系统服务(232.40%)和改善景观连通性(79.22%)方面效果显著。本文提出了矿区生态恢复的多情景ESP优化方法,为矿产资源密集型城市的生态安全和可持续发展提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信