Digital Therapeutics for People with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review of Their Effect on Symptoms and Functioning

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel Fulford, Christoph U Correll, Philip D Harvey, Alex S Cohen
{"title":"Digital Therapeutics for People with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review of Their Effect on Symptoms and Functioning","authors":"Daniel Fulford, Christoph U Correll, Philip D Harvey, Alex S Cohen","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Hypothesis Digital therapeutics (DTs; health software to treat/alleviate a disease/condition) may provide accessible evidence-based care to people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated whether people with SSD find DTs acceptable and can use them effectively; whether DTs are effective and generally safe; and if DT use can impact functioning, quality of life (QoL), and other outcomes. Study Design This PROSPERO-registered SLR (CRD42023476545) was conducted to identify articles assessing DTs in adults with SSD. Databases (MEDLINE/Embase/PsycINFO/Cochrane-SR/ClinicalTrials.gov/WHO International Clinical Trials Registry) and key congresses were searched up to January 28, 2024. Screening was completed by 2 reviewers, each blinded to the other’s decisions, and article summaries were extracted. Study Results Of 886 unique citations, 115 eligible citations provided 38 unique primary studies with results and 10 linked citations. Engagement and satisfaction with DTs were generally high. Among 24 studies assessing the effectiveness of DT use on negative and positive symptoms, cognitive performance, mood, depression and/or anxiety, medication adherence, recovery, and general/other symptoms, 17 had ≥1 outcome showing significant change versus comparator/baseline; 24 had ≥1 outcome showing no significant difference. DTs were generally safe. Of 24 studies reporting real-world functioning, QoL, and other outcomes, 11 reported ≥1 significant outcome; 24 reported ≥1 outcome showing no difference versus comparator/baseline. Conclusions People with SSD can use DTs effectively and find them acceptable. Although effectiveness outcomes varied across/within studies, DTs may provide an acceptable strategy for delivering accessible, generally safe, evidence-based care to people with SSD.","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaf134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Digital therapeutics (DTs; health software to treat/alleviate a disease/condition) may provide accessible evidence-based care to people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated whether people with SSD find DTs acceptable and can use them effectively; whether DTs are effective and generally safe; and if DT use can impact functioning, quality of life (QoL), and other outcomes. Study Design This PROSPERO-registered SLR (CRD42023476545) was conducted to identify articles assessing DTs in adults with SSD. Databases (MEDLINE/Embase/PsycINFO/Cochrane-SR/ClinicalTrials.gov/WHO International Clinical Trials Registry) and key congresses were searched up to January 28, 2024. Screening was completed by 2 reviewers, each blinded to the other’s decisions, and article summaries were extracted. Study Results Of 886 unique citations, 115 eligible citations provided 38 unique primary studies with results and 10 linked citations. Engagement and satisfaction with DTs were generally high. Among 24 studies assessing the effectiveness of DT use on negative and positive symptoms, cognitive performance, mood, depression and/or anxiety, medication adherence, recovery, and general/other symptoms, 17 had ≥1 outcome showing significant change versus comparator/baseline; 24 had ≥1 outcome showing no significant difference. DTs were generally safe. Of 24 studies reporting real-world functioning, QoL, and other outcomes, 11 reported ≥1 significant outcome; 24 reported ≥1 outcome showing no difference versus comparator/baseline. Conclusions People with SSD can use DTs effectively and find them acceptable. Although effectiveness outcomes varied across/within studies, DTs may provide an acceptable strategy for delivering accessible, generally safe, evidence-based care to people with SSD.
精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的数字治疗:对其症状和功能影响的系统文献综述
背景与假设数字疗法(DTs;用于治疗/缓解疾病/病症的健康软件)可能为精神分裂症谱系障碍(ssd)患者提供可获得的循证护理。本系统文献综述(SLR)调查了SSD患者是否认为DTs是可接受的,并能有效地使用它们;DTs是否有效和一般安全;以及使用DT是否会影响功能、生活质量(QoL)和其他结果。研究设计:本研究采用prospero注册的SLR (CRD42023476545)来识别评估成人SSD患者dt的文章。检索截止到2024年1月28日的数据库(MEDLINE/Embase/PsycINFO/Cochrane-SR/ClinicalTrials.gov/WHO International ClinicalTrials Registry)和主要会议。筛选由2位审稿人完成,每位审稿人对对方的决定不知情,并提取文章摘要。研究结果在886条独立引用中,115条符合条件的引用提供了38条独特的原始研究结果和10条链接引用。对DTs的参与和满意度普遍较高。在评估DT治疗阴性和阳性症状、认知表现、情绪、抑郁和/或焦虑、药物依从性、恢复和一般/其他症状有效性的24项研究中,17项研究的结果≥1项,与比较组/基线相比显示出显著变化;24例≥1个结局,差异无统计学意义。DTs通常是安全的。在报告现实世界功能、生活质量和其他结果的24项研究中,11项报告了≥1个显著结果;24个报告了≥1个结果,与比较者/基线没有差异。结论SSD患者能有效地使用DTs,并能接受DTs。虽然不同研究之间的疗效结果不同,但直接疗法可能为SSD患者提供可获得的、通常安全的、基于证据的护理提供了一种可接受的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信