EFL instructors’ critical thinking: Cognition, practices, and dispositions

IF 3.8 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wondifraw Mihret Dessie, Zelalem Berhanu Guadu
{"title":"EFL instructors’ critical thinking: Cognition, practices, and dispositions","authors":"Wondifraw Mihret Dessie, Zelalem Berhanu Guadu","doi":"10.1177/13621688251352267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary language education aims to promote 21st-century core thinking-related competencies. Achieving this goal requires empowered teachers with strong beliefs and practices that support effective language instruction. In this context, English-as-a-foreign-language instructors’ understanding of creative and critical thinking plays a crucial role in integrating critical thinking standards into English language teaching, thereby fostering multiple competencies. This study examines English-as-a-foreign-language instructors’ critical thinking cognition, practices, and dispositions, along with their interdependence. Employing a concurrent mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative analysis with in-depth exploration. Ninety-two instructors were selected using systematic random sampling from three Ethiopian universities and participated by responding to structured and open-ended questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentages, <jats:italic>t</jats:italic> -tests, and multiple linear regression techniques, whereas qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Findings indicate that although instructors demonstrate awareness and familiarity with critical thinking, many struggle to conceptualize it fully. Most instructors often focus on lower-order critical thinking standards and engage students in less cognitively demanding activities. This tendency is frequently attributed to challenges within the educational environment, diverse student backgrounds, and limitations in instructors’ own preparedness. To address these issues, it is recommended to implement awareness-raising initiatives, provide professional development training, and facilitate discussions aimed at enhancing instructors’ understanding and application of critical thinking.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251352267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary language education aims to promote 21st-century core thinking-related competencies. Achieving this goal requires empowered teachers with strong beliefs and practices that support effective language instruction. In this context, English-as-a-foreign-language instructors’ understanding of creative and critical thinking plays a crucial role in integrating critical thinking standards into English language teaching, thereby fostering multiple competencies. This study examines English-as-a-foreign-language instructors’ critical thinking cognition, practices, and dispositions, along with their interdependence. Employing a concurrent mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative analysis with in-depth exploration. Ninety-two instructors were selected using systematic random sampling from three Ethiopian universities and participated by responding to structured and open-ended questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentages, t -tests, and multiple linear regression techniques, whereas qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Findings indicate that although instructors demonstrate awareness and familiarity with critical thinking, many struggle to conceptualize it fully. Most instructors often focus on lower-order critical thinking standards and engage students in less cognitively demanding activities. This tendency is frequently attributed to challenges within the educational environment, diverse student backgrounds, and limitations in instructors’ own preparedness. To address these issues, it is recommended to implement awareness-raising initiatives, provide professional development training, and facilitate discussions aimed at enhancing instructors’ understanding and application of critical thinking.
英语教师的批判性思维:认知、实践与倾向
当代语言教育旨在培养与21世纪核心思维相关的能力。要实现这一目标,教师必须拥有坚定的信念和实践,以支持有效的语言教学。在这种背景下,英语作为外语的教师对创造性思维和批判性思维的理解对于将批判性思维标准融入英语教学中,从而培养多种能力起着至关重要的作用。本研究考察了英语作为外语教师的批判性思维、认知、实践和倾向,以及它们之间的相互依存关系。本研究采用并行混合方法,将定量分析与深度探索相结合。采用系统随机抽样从埃塞俄比亚三所大学中选出92名教师,并通过回答结构化和开放式问卷参与研究。定量数据采用百分比、t检验和多元线性回归技术进行分析,定性数据采用专题分析。研究结果表明,尽管教师表现出对批判性思维的认识和熟悉,但许多人很难将其充分概念化。大多数教师通常关注较低层次的批判性思维标准,并让学生参与对认知要求较低的活动。这种趋势通常归因于教育环境的挑战、学生背景的多样化以及教师自身准备的局限性。为了解决这些问题,建议实施提高认识的举措,提供专业发展培训,并促进旨在提高教师对批判性思维的理解和应用的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信