Skilful global seasonal predictions from a machine learning weather model trained on reanalysis data

IF 8.4 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Chris Kent, Adam A. Scaife, Nick J. Dunstone, Doug Smith, Steven C. Hardiman, Tom Dunstan, Oliver Watt-Meyer
{"title":"Skilful global seasonal predictions from a machine learning weather model trained on reanalysis data","authors":"Chris Kent, Adam A. Scaife, Nick J. Dunstone, Doug Smith, Steven C. Hardiman, Tom Dunstan, Oliver Watt-Meyer","doi":"10.1038/s41612-025-01198-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Machine learning weather models trained on observed atmospheric conditions can outperform conventional physics-based models at short- to medium-range (1–14 day) forecast timescales. Here we take the machine learning model ACE2, trained to predict 6-hourly steps in atmospheric evolution and which can remain stable over long forecast periods, and assess it from a seasonal forecasting perspective (1–3 month lead time). Applying persisted sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice anomalies centred on 1<sup>st</sup> November each year, we initialise a lagged ensemble of seasonal predictions covering 1993/1994 to 2015/2016. Over this 23-year period there is remarkable similarity in the patterns of predictability with a leading physics-based model. The ACE2 model exhibits skilful predictions of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) with a correlation score of 0.47 (<i>p</i> = 0.02), as well as a realistic global distribution of skill and ensemble spread. Surprisingly, ACE2 is found to exhibit a signal-to-noise error as seen in physics-based models, in which it is better at predicting the real world than itself. Examining predictions of winter 2009/2010 indicates potential limitations of ACE2 in capturing extreme seasonal conditions that extend outside the training data. This study reveals that machine learning weather models can produce skilful global seasonal predictions and provide new opportunities for increased understanding, development and generation of near-term climate predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19438,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01198-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning weather models trained on observed atmospheric conditions can outperform conventional physics-based models at short- to medium-range (1–14 day) forecast timescales. Here we take the machine learning model ACE2, trained to predict 6-hourly steps in atmospheric evolution and which can remain stable over long forecast periods, and assess it from a seasonal forecasting perspective (1–3 month lead time). Applying persisted sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice anomalies centred on 1st November each year, we initialise a lagged ensemble of seasonal predictions covering 1993/1994 to 2015/2016. Over this 23-year period there is remarkable similarity in the patterns of predictability with a leading physics-based model. The ACE2 model exhibits skilful predictions of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) with a correlation score of 0.47 (p = 0.02), as well as a realistic global distribution of skill and ensemble spread. Surprisingly, ACE2 is found to exhibit a signal-to-noise error as seen in physics-based models, in which it is better at predicting the real world than itself. Examining predictions of winter 2009/2010 indicates potential limitations of ACE2 in capturing extreme seasonal conditions that extend outside the training data. This study reveals that machine learning weather models can produce skilful global seasonal predictions and provide new opportunities for increased understanding, development and generation of near-term climate predictions.

Abstract Image

通过再分析数据训练的机器学习天气模型进行熟练的全球季节预测
在观测到的大气条件下训练的机器学习天气模型在中短期(1-14天)预测时间尺度上优于传统的基于物理的模型。在这里,我们采用机器学习模型ACE2,该模型经过训练,可以预测大气演变的6小时步骤,并且可以在很长的预测期内保持稳定,并从季节预测的角度(1-3个月的提前期)对其进行评估。利用以每年11月1日为中心的持续海温(SST)和海冰异常,我们初始化了1993/1994至2015/2016年的滞后季节预测集合。在这23年的时间里,可预测性的模式与一个领先的基于物理的模型有着惊人的相似之处。ACE2模式对北大西洋涛动(NAO)的预测能力很强,相关分数为0.47 (p = 0.02),而且预测能力和集合传播的全球分布也很真实。令人惊讶的是,ACE2被发现在基于物理的模型中表现出一种信噪误差,在这种模型中,ACE2比它自己更善于预测现实世界。对2009/2010年冬季预测的审查表明,ACE2在捕捉训练数据之外的极端季节性条件方面存在潜在局限性。这项研究表明,机器学习天气模型可以产生熟练的全球季节预测,并为增加对近期气候预测的理解、发展和生成提供新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
87
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Climate and Atmospheric Science is an open-access journal encompassing the relevant physical, chemical, and biological aspects of atmospheric and climate science. The journal places particular emphasis on regional studies that unveil new insights into specific localities, including examinations of local atmospheric composition, such as aerosols. The range of topics covered by the journal includes climate dynamics, climate variability, weather and climate prediction, climate change, ocean dynamics, weather extremes, air pollution, atmospheric chemistry (including aerosols), the hydrological cycle, and atmosphere–ocean and atmosphere–land interactions. The journal welcomes studies employing a diverse array of methods, including numerical and statistical modeling, the development and application of in situ observational techniques, remote sensing, and the development or evaluation of new reanalyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信