Trajectories and predictors of psychological recovery post zero-COVID among Chinese adolescents in disadvantaged regions

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Yanjun Guan, Xingkui Zhu, Chun Chen, Shangyao Su, Hong Deng, Yuqing Xie, Xiaoyuan Li, Yingni Cai, Cheng Xu, Erifia Tursun, Wenyang Gao
{"title":"Trajectories and predictors of psychological recovery post zero-COVID among Chinese adolescents in disadvantaged regions","authors":"Yanjun Guan,&nbsp;Xingkui Zhu,&nbsp;Chun Chen,&nbsp;Shangyao Su,&nbsp;Hong Deng,&nbsp;Yuqing Xie,&nbsp;Xiaoyuan Li,&nbsp;Yingni Cai,&nbsp;Cheng Xu,&nbsp;Erifia Tursun,&nbsp;Wenyang Gao","doi":"10.1111/jora.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the relaxation of social restrictions, it seems intuitive to expect significant reductions in learning difficulties and psychological distress among adolescents. However, their psychological recovery could be hindered by the increased stress arising from rapidly changing environments, particularly for those from less developed regions. A three-wave study focusing on Chinese adolescents (<i>N</i> = 962) from economically disadvantaged regions was conducted to examine their psychological distress and academic inefficacy changes before and after the relaxation of the Zero-COVID policy established in December 2022 as well as to identify predictors and mediators of the change trajectories across T1 (three months before the policy), T2 (three months after the policy), and T3 (six months after T2). Counterintuitively, latent growth modeling (LGM) indicated deteriorating trends in students' psychological distress and academic inefficacy. From a change management perspective, structural equation modeling (SEM) further showed that at the individual level, perceived legitimacy of change (T2) was found to positively predict the slopes of psychological distress and academic inefficacy from T1 to T3 through the mediation of self-determination need fulfillment (T2), whereas perceived change unplannedness (T2) negatively predicted the changes, mediated by perceived relative deprivation (T2). These findings shed light on the risk and resilience factors of disadvantaged adolescents' post-pandemic psychological recovery, providing important implications for policymakers and the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the relaxation of social restrictions, it seems intuitive to expect significant reductions in learning difficulties and psychological distress among adolescents. However, their psychological recovery could be hindered by the increased stress arising from rapidly changing environments, particularly for those from less developed regions. A three-wave study focusing on Chinese adolescents (N = 962) from economically disadvantaged regions was conducted to examine their psychological distress and academic inefficacy changes before and after the relaxation of the Zero-COVID policy established in December 2022 as well as to identify predictors and mediators of the change trajectories across T1 (three months before the policy), T2 (three months after the policy), and T3 (six months after T2). Counterintuitively, latent growth modeling (LGM) indicated deteriorating trends in students' psychological distress and academic inefficacy. From a change management perspective, structural equation modeling (SEM) further showed that at the individual level, perceived legitimacy of change (T2) was found to positively predict the slopes of psychological distress and academic inefficacy from T1 to T3 through the mediation of self-determination need fulfillment (T2), whereas perceived change unplannedness (T2) negatively predicted the changes, mediated by perceived relative deprivation (T2). These findings shed light on the risk and resilience factors of disadvantaged adolescents' post-pandemic psychological recovery, providing important implications for policymakers and the community.

中国弱势地区青少年零冠后心理康复轨迹及预测因素
随着新冠肺炎大流行的结束和社会限制的放松,人们似乎可以直观地预期青少年的学习困难和心理困扰会大幅减少。然而,他们的心理恢复可能会受到迅速变化的环境所造成的压力增加的阻碍,特别是对那些来自较不发达区域的人来说。本研究以中国经济落后地区青少年(N = 962)为研究对象,研究了2022年12月零冠政策实施前后青少年心理困扰和学业效能低下的变化,并确定了政策实施前T1(政策实施前3个月)、政策实施后T2(政策实施后3个月)和政策实施后T3(政策实施后6个月)变化轨迹的预测因子和中介因子。与直觉相反的是,潜在增长模型(LGM)表明,学生的心理困扰和学业效能低下有恶化的趋势。从变革管理的角度,结构方程模型(SEM)进一步发现,在个体层面上,感知变革合法性(T2)通过自我决定需要满足(T2)的中介正向预测心理困扰和学业无效从T1到T3的斜率,而感知变革计划性(T2)通过感知相对剥夺(T2)的中介负向预测变化。这些发现揭示了弱势青少年大流行后心理恢复的风险和复原力因素,为政策制定者和社区提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信