{"title":"Multidimensional Determinants of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients: The Overlooked Roles of Depression and Cognitive Function","authors":"Seçil Beyece İncazlı, Gülseren Keskin, Sema Üstündağ, Neslihan Tezcan, Ebru Demirel Sezer","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to examine the level of frailty in patients undergoing haemodialysis treatment and investigate the effects of sociodemographic, psychological and clinical variables on frailty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional and correlational research design was employed with 386 haemodialysis patients over the age of 50. Data were collected using the Edmonton Frail Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Standardized Mini-Mental Test and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study revealed that 48.4% of haemodialysis patients fell into the ‘apparently frail’ category, and frailty levels were significantly associated with age, depression and cognitive functions (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant effect of gender, marital status, educational level, chronic diseases or personality traits on frailty was identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Most haemodialysis patients were found to be apparently frail, with frailty levels increasing with age. Furthermore, frailty was linked to higher levels of depressive symptoms and lower cognitive function. Evaluating depression and cognitive function is crucial for alleviating frailty symptoms and improving quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This study aims to examine the level of frailty in patients undergoing haemodialysis treatment and investigate the effects of sociodemographic, psychological and clinical variables on frailty.
Method
A cross-sectional and correlational research design was employed with 386 haemodialysis patients over the age of 50. Data were collected using the Edmonton Frail Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Standardized Mini-Mental Test and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.
Results
The study revealed that 48.4% of haemodialysis patients fell into the ‘apparently frail’ category, and frailty levels were significantly associated with age, depression and cognitive functions (p < 0.05). However, no significant effect of gender, marital status, educational level, chronic diseases or personality traits on frailty was identified.
Conclusions
Most haemodialysis patients were found to be apparently frail, with frailty levels increasing with age. Furthermore, frailty was linked to higher levels of depressive symptoms and lower cognitive function. Evaluating depression and cognitive function is crucial for alleviating frailty symptoms and improving quality of life.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.