Güler Yıldırım, Merve Karaca Şahin, Nilay Çalışkan, Hamit Boloğur, Muhammed Fatih Erbay, Hilal Güngör, Şefika İlknur Kökçü Karadağ, Aslı Berivan Topçak, Deniz Özçeker
{"title":"Evaluation of Diagnosis, Cross-Reactivity, and Risk Factors in Pediatric Patients With Macrolide Allergy","authors":"Güler Yıldırım, Merve Karaca Şahin, Nilay Çalışkan, Hamit Boloğur, Muhammed Fatih Erbay, Hilal Güngör, Şefika İlknur Kökçü Karadağ, Aslı Berivan Topçak, Deniz Özçeker","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Macrolide antibiotics are generally considered safe in children, but allergic reactions can still occur. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of intradermal test (IDT) used to detect macrolide allergy in pediatric patients, investigate the rate of cross-reactivity between clarithromycin and azithromycin, and identify factors influencing the development of macrolide allergy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 102 patients with suspected clarithromycin and azithromycin allergy were included in the study. Characteristics of the reactions and results of skin and drug oral provocation test (OPT) were recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Clarithromycin was confirmed as the culprit drug in 8 (9%) of 88 patients, and azithromycin in 1 (7.1%) of 14 patients. The cross-reactivity between clarithromycin and azithromycin determined 11.1%. In patients with immediate-type reactions, IDT performed at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL demonstrated a sensitivity of 33.3% (95% CI: 0.0%–66.7%) and a specificity of 92.7% (95% CI: 82.9%–100%). When a higher concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was used, sensitivity increased to 100% (95% CI: 0.0%–100%), while specificity decreased to 78.9% (95% CI: 65.8%–92.1%) respectively. According to univariate logistic regression analysis, patients with a history of previous non-macrolide drug allergy (<i>p</i>: 0.003, Odds Ratio [OR]: 41, 95% CI: 3.6–456.5) and family history of drug allergy (<i>p</i> = 0.026, OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.2–22.5) were at a significantly higher risk of developing macrolide allergy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although IDT at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL showed higher specificity (92.7%) compared to 0.5 mg/mL (78.9%), given its limited sensitivity, OPT is still required to confirm the diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Macrolide antibiotics are generally considered safe in children, but allergic reactions can still occur. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of intradermal test (IDT) used to detect macrolide allergy in pediatric patients, investigate the rate of cross-reactivity between clarithromycin and azithromycin, and identify factors influencing the development of macrolide allergy.
Methods
A total of 102 patients with suspected clarithromycin and azithromycin allergy were included in the study. Characteristics of the reactions and results of skin and drug oral provocation test (OPT) were recorded.
Results
Clarithromycin was confirmed as the culprit drug in 8 (9%) of 88 patients, and azithromycin in 1 (7.1%) of 14 patients. The cross-reactivity between clarithromycin and azithromycin determined 11.1%. In patients with immediate-type reactions, IDT performed at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL demonstrated a sensitivity of 33.3% (95% CI: 0.0%–66.7%) and a specificity of 92.7% (95% CI: 82.9%–100%). When a higher concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was used, sensitivity increased to 100% (95% CI: 0.0%–100%), while specificity decreased to 78.9% (95% CI: 65.8%–92.1%) respectively. According to univariate logistic regression analysis, patients with a history of previous non-macrolide drug allergy (p: 0.003, Odds Ratio [OR]: 41, 95% CI: 3.6–456.5) and family history of drug allergy (p = 0.026, OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.2–22.5) were at a significantly higher risk of developing macrolide allergy.
Conclusions
Although IDT at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL showed higher specificity (92.7%) compared to 0.5 mg/mL (78.9%), given its limited sensitivity, OPT is still required to confirm the diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience.
Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.