Nudging and Inequality: Examining the Heterogeneous Effects of Behavioural Interventions on Low Socio-economic Status Individuals

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS
Viviana Ponce de León Solís
{"title":"Nudging and Inequality: Examining the Heterogeneous Effects of Behavioural Interventions on Low Socio-economic Status Individuals","authors":"Viviana Ponce de León Solís","doi":"10.1111/japp.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article explores the heterogeneous effects of nudging interventions on individuals from low socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds, addressing a significant gap in the existing literature on behavioural policy. While nudges are widely implemented across various social domains due to their perceived efficiency and low cost, their effectiveness can vary greatly among different demographic groups. The analysis identifies three hypotheses regarding low SES individuals' responses to nudging: they may be more susceptible, less susceptible, or exhibit similar susceptibility to nudges compared to higher SES groups. By examining the implications of these disparities, the article underscores the potential for nudging strategies to unintentionally reinforce existing inequalities or stigmatize vulnerable populations. Ethical considerations are discussed, highlighting the necessity for policymakers to design nudges with an acute awareness of the unique barriers faced by low SES individuals. Ultimately, this research advocates for a shift away from the conventional ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach towards more nuanced, context-sensitive nudging interventions that effectively address the needs and challenges of marginalized groups, emphasizing the importance of targeted strategies in promoting equitable outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 4","pages":"1094-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the heterogeneous effects of nudging interventions on individuals from low socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds, addressing a significant gap in the existing literature on behavioural policy. While nudges are widely implemented across various social domains due to their perceived efficiency and low cost, their effectiveness can vary greatly among different demographic groups. The analysis identifies three hypotheses regarding low SES individuals' responses to nudging: they may be more susceptible, less susceptible, or exhibit similar susceptibility to nudges compared to higher SES groups. By examining the implications of these disparities, the article underscores the potential for nudging strategies to unintentionally reinforce existing inequalities or stigmatize vulnerable populations. Ethical considerations are discussed, highlighting the necessity for policymakers to design nudges with an acute awareness of the unique barriers faced by low SES individuals. Ultimately, this research advocates for a shift away from the conventional ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach towards more nuanced, context-sensitive nudging interventions that effectively address the needs and challenges of marginalized groups, emphasizing the importance of targeted strategies in promoting equitable outcomes.

轻推与不平等:检查行为干预对低社会经济地位个体的异质效应
本文探讨了轻推干预对来自低社会经济地位(SES)背景的个体的异质影响,解决了现有文献中关于行为政策的重大差距。虽然轻推由于其公认的效率和低成本而在各种社会领域得到广泛实施,但其效果在不同的人口群体中差异很大。分析确定了关于低社会经济地位个体对轻推的反应的三种假设:与高社会经济地位群体相比,他们可能更容易受到轻推的影响,不那么容易受到轻推的影响,或者表现出类似的易感性。通过研究这些差异的影响,文章强调了推动策略无意中加剧现有不平等或使弱势群体污名化的可能性。本文还讨论了伦理方面的考虑,强调了政策制定者在设计推动措施时必须敏锐地意识到低社会经济地位个体所面临的独特障碍。最后,本研究倡导从传统的“一刀切”方法转向更细致、对环境敏感的推动干预措施,以有效解决边缘化群体的需求和挑战,强调有针对性的战略在促进公平结果方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信