{"title":"Revealing the Full Picture of Agricultural Plastic Legacy Pollution: Toward “Zero-Leakage” Management in Chinese Farmlands","authors":"Zhidong Zhang, Zhongling Guo","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The theme for World Environment Day on June 5, 2025, was “Beat Plastic Pollution.” Indeed, by affecting different environmental compartments, plastic pollution has emerged as a global concern, with agricultural plastic mulch films being a major source of farmland contamination (Rillig et al. <span>2024</span>; Thompson et al. <span>2024</span>). Significantly, as the world's leading plastic mulch film-consuming country, China uses approximately 68% of global plastic mulch film produced globally (Dai et al. <span>2025</span>). The increasing application of plastic mulch film has led to persistent residue accumulation, which degrades soil integrity, hinders hydrological and nutrient processes, and results in weak germination and loss of crop yield (Zhang et al. <span>2020</span>; Huang and Xia <span>2024</span>; Landrigan et al. <span>2025</span>). Despite rising concerns, there is limited systematic, nationwide research on agricultural plastic pollution in China, particularly in terms of trend prediction and impact assessment.</p><p>To date, the common approaches for precise quantification of plastic mulch film debris include remote sensing–based mapping of plastic mulch film coverage, geostatistical methods, substance flow analysis, and machine learning algorithms (Zhou et al. <span>2023</span>; Zhang et al. <span>2025</span>). In fact, these methods have several limitations when they are applied at a regional scale, including data scarcity, poor model interpretability, and insufficient capacity to simulate dynamic policy scenarios, thus restricting their applicability to national-scale debris monitoring and policymaking. This critical knowledge gap has significantly hindered the development and targeted implementation of evidence-based policies aimed at controlling plastic mulch film contamination in China.</p><p>Once regarded as a breakthrough in boosting agricultural productivity and water-use efficiency, plastic mulch film is now recognized as a double-edged sword within China's agricultural systems. These limitations underscore the need for integrated modeling approaches—a gap addressed by Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>). In the study published in <i>Global Change Biology</i>, Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>) offer a national inventory of macroplastic residues (> 5 mm) in Chinese croplands, providing quantitative predictions of environmental impact trends from 1993 to 2050. Marked by its integration of comprehensive datasets and methodologically robust modeling, their study is the most detailed and authoritative quantification of agricultural plastic pollution in China to date. With China accounting for approximately 68% of global plastic mulch film consumption, Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>) bridge the gap between localized empirical observations and the data requirements of national-scale policy formulation by integrating 3145 field survey sites and over three decades of national mulch usage statistics.</p><p>Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>) achieve high-resolution spatiotemporal quantification of plastic pollution burdens across China's croplands. They employ a zero-intercept linear regression model to assess the relationship between historical cumulative plastic mulch film usage and residual mass retention in soils. Grounded in a robust empirical dataset, their model exhibits broad applicability and highlights three distinct advantages. First, even in the absence of comprehensive sampling, the model integrates existing field observations with historical usage data and facilitates effective county-level extrapolation nationwide. Thus the method significantly enhances spatial coverage and estimation accuracy. Second, the transparent zero-intercept linear formulation explicitly captures the cumulative relationship between mulch film input and residual accumulation. This measure allows for cross-regional comparisons and policy-response simulations. Third, the model is characterized by a strong dynamic predictive capacity. This enables the authors to design future scenarios with varying rates of biodegradable mulch replacement and quantitatively evaluate the potential effectiveness of each in mitigating residue accumulation trends. Therefore, by integrating scientific assessment, policy guidance, and risk forecasting, their study presents a cohesive analytical framework. This modeling paradigm constitutes a methodological breakthrough in attributing sources of environmental plastic pollution while offering a “China solution” for advancing the global monitoring and management of agricultural plastic pollution. Furthermore, it underscores a quintessential sustainability paradox: while enabling China to “feed an additional 85 million people,” plastic mulch films have undermined the ecological foundations of agricultural production. Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>) emphasize a “zero-leakage” management objective while cautioning against the misconception of “zero-use,” thus providing a more pragmatic alternative to uniform, regionally imposed plastic-restriction policies.</p><p>Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>) not only evaluate current levels of plastic pollution in agricultural soils but also forecast future trends under varying policy scenarios, specifically examining biodegradable mulch replacement rates of 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60%. Their findings present a critical warning: if existing practices remain unchanged, cumulative plastic residues could reach 6.24 million metric tons by 2050. By integrating policy-driven scenario analysis, the study provides substantial practical value and strategic insight for decision-making, thereby supporting China's agricultural transition from a focus on quantity to one of quality and sustainability.</p><p>In conclusion, the study by Dai et al. (<span>2025</span>) represents a significant leap forward in agricultural plastic film mulch research, leveraging interdisciplinary collaboration, multiscale modeling, and decades of empirical data. Despite persistent challenges arising from data limitations and complex underlying processes, their study enhances scientific rigor and policy relevance by employing standardized sampling protocols, a transparent model architecture, and robust scenario analyses. The creation of a national spatiotemporal inventory of plastic mulch film contamination marks a crucial step toward the systemic governance of nonpoint-source plastic pollution in Chinese agriculture, offering a quantitative foundation for targeted mitigation efforts. In the future, the national policies and local control techniques about plastic film mulch are urgently required to combat microplastic pollution toward “zero-leakage” management in China.</p><p>Nevertheless, there is still a gap in determining high-precision and long-term plastic film mulch inventory on a national scale. Future research should incorporate multi-source remote sensing data, field sample datasets, and robust algorithms to precisely evaluate plastic film mulch debris and further better understand residue migration and transformation dynamics in soil. Besides, the policy practices including thicker (or biodegradable) plastic film, affordable machinery, and adequate economic rewards for recycling plastic film are also feasible measures in reducing plastic film mulch contamination. However, the campaign for controlling plastic film mulch pollution involves several state ministries and administrations in China. The government's decision-making may lag behind the development of plastic film mulch pollution. Therefore, a powerful steering committee with a more effective institutional framework may be necessary to curb and further reverse plastic film mulch contamination, while refining risk assessment strategies and response frameworks to facilitate a region-specific, adaptive approach to farmland plastic pollution control.</p><p><b>Zhidong Zhang:</b> data curation, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Zhongling Guo:</b> funding acquisition, methodology, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This article is a Invited Commentary on Dai et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70297.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70471","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The theme for World Environment Day on June 5, 2025, was “Beat Plastic Pollution.” Indeed, by affecting different environmental compartments, plastic pollution has emerged as a global concern, with agricultural plastic mulch films being a major source of farmland contamination (Rillig et al. 2024; Thompson et al. 2024). Significantly, as the world's leading plastic mulch film-consuming country, China uses approximately 68% of global plastic mulch film produced globally (Dai et al. 2025). The increasing application of plastic mulch film has led to persistent residue accumulation, which degrades soil integrity, hinders hydrological and nutrient processes, and results in weak germination and loss of crop yield (Zhang et al. 2020; Huang and Xia 2024; Landrigan et al. 2025). Despite rising concerns, there is limited systematic, nationwide research on agricultural plastic pollution in China, particularly in terms of trend prediction and impact assessment.
To date, the common approaches for precise quantification of plastic mulch film debris include remote sensing–based mapping of plastic mulch film coverage, geostatistical methods, substance flow analysis, and machine learning algorithms (Zhou et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2025). In fact, these methods have several limitations when they are applied at a regional scale, including data scarcity, poor model interpretability, and insufficient capacity to simulate dynamic policy scenarios, thus restricting their applicability to national-scale debris monitoring and policymaking. This critical knowledge gap has significantly hindered the development and targeted implementation of evidence-based policies aimed at controlling plastic mulch film contamination in China.
Once regarded as a breakthrough in boosting agricultural productivity and water-use efficiency, plastic mulch film is now recognized as a double-edged sword within China's agricultural systems. These limitations underscore the need for integrated modeling approaches—a gap addressed by Dai et al. (2025). In the study published in Global Change Biology, Dai et al. (2025) offer a national inventory of macroplastic residues (> 5 mm) in Chinese croplands, providing quantitative predictions of environmental impact trends from 1993 to 2050. Marked by its integration of comprehensive datasets and methodologically robust modeling, their study is the most detailed and authoritative quantification of agricultural plastic pollution in China to date. With China accounting for approximately 68% of global plastic mulch film consumption, Dai et al. (2025) bridge the gap between localized empirical observations and the data requirements of national-scale policy formulation by integrating 3145 field survey sites and over three decades of national mulch usage statistics.
Dai et al. (2025) achieve high-resolution spatiotemporal quantification of plastic pollution burdens across China's croplands. They employ a zero-intercept linear regression model to assess the relationship between historical cumulative plastic mulch film usage and residual mass retention in soils. Grounded in a robust empirical dataset, their model exhibits broad applicability and highlights three distinct advantages. First, even in the absence of comprehensive sampling, the model integrates existing field observations with historical usage data and facilitates effective county-level extrapolation nationwide. Thus the method significantly enhances spatial coverage and estimation accuracy. Second, the transparent zero-intercept linear formulation explicitly captures the cumulative relationship between mulch film input and residual accumulation. This measure allows for cross-regional comparisons and policy-response simulations. Third, the model is characterized by a strong dynamic predictive capacity. This enables the authors to design future scenarios with varying rates of biodegradable mulch replacement and quantitatively evaluate the potential effectiveness of each in mitigating residue accumulation trends. Therefore, by integrating scientific assessment, policy guidance, and risk forecasting, their study presents a cohesive analytical framework. This modeling paradigm constitutes a methodological breakthrough in attributing sources of environmental plastic pollution while offering a “China solution” for advancing the global monitoring and management of agricultural plastic pollution. Furthermore, it underscores a quintessential sustainability paradox: while enabling China to “feed an additional 85 million people,” plastic mulch films have undermined the ecological foundations of agricultural production. Dai et al. (2025) emphasize a “zero-leakage” management objective while cautioning against the misconception of “zero-use,” thus providing a more pragmatic alternative to uniform, regionally imposed plastic-restriction policies.
Dai et al. (2025) not only evaluate current levels of plastic pollution in agricultural soils but also forecast future trends under varying policy scenarios, specifically examining biodegradable mulch replacement rates of 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60%. Their findings present a critical warning: if existing practices remain unchanged, cumulative plastic residues could reach 6.24 million metric tons by 2050. By integrating policy-driven scenario analysis, the study provides substantial practical value and strategic insight for decision-making, thereby supporting China's agricultural transition from a focus on quantity to one of quality and sustainability.
In conclusion, the study by Dai et al. (2025) represents a significant leap forward in agricultural plastic film mulch research, leveraging interdisciplinary collaboration, multiscale modeling, and decades of empirical data. Despite persistent challenges arising from data limitations and complex underlying processes, their study enhances scientific rigor and policy relevance by employing standardized sampling protocols, a transparent model architecture, and robust scenario analyses. The creation of a national spatiotemporal inventory of plastic mulch film contamination marks a crucial step toward the systemic governance of nonpoint-source plastic pollution in Chinese agriculture, offering a quantitative foundation for targeted mitigation efforts. In the future, the national policies and local control techniques about plastic film mulch are urgently required to combat microplastic pollution toward “zero-leakage” management in China.
Nevertheless, there is still a gap in determining high-precision and long-term plastic film mulch inventory on a national scale. Future research should incorporate multi-source remote sensing data, field sample datasets, and robust algorithms to precisely evaluate plastic film mulch debris and further better understand residue migration and transformation dynamics in soil. Besides, the policy practices including thicker (or biodegradable) plastic film, affordable machinery, and adequate economic rewards for recycling plastic film are also feasible measures in reducing plastic film mulch contamination. However, the campaign for controlling plastic film mulch pollution involves several state ministries and administrations in China. The government's decision-making may lag behind the development of plastic film mulch pollution. Therefore, a powerful steering committee with a more effective institutional framework may be necessary to curb and further reverse plastic film mulch contamination, while refining risk assessment strategies and response frameworks to facilitate a region-specific, adaptive approach to farmland plastic pollution control.
Zhidong Zhang: data curation, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Zhongling Guo: funding acquisition, methodology, writing – review and editing.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This article is a Invited Commentary on Dai et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70297.
2025年6月5日世界环境日的主题是“战胜塑料污染”。事实上,通过影响不同的环境隔间,塑料污染已成为全球关注的问题,农用塑料地膜是农田污染的主要来源(Rillig et al. 2024; Thompson et al. 2024)。值得注意的是,作为世界领先的地膜消费国,中国使用了全球约68%的地膜(Dai et al. 2025)。地膜用量的增加导致土壤残留持续积累,降低土壤完整性,阻碍水文和养分过程,导致作物发芽率低,减产(Zhang et al. 2020; Huang and Xia 2024; Landrigan et al. 2025)。尽管关注日益增加,但中国对农用塑料污染的系统的、全国性的研究有限,特别是在趋势预测和影响评估方面。迄今为止,精确量化地膜碎片的常用方法包括基于遥感的地膜覆盖制图、地质统计学方法、物质流分析和机器学习算法(Zhou et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2025)。事实上,这些方法在区域尺度上的应用存在数据稀缺、模型可解释性差、动态政策情景模拟能力不足等局限性,从而限制了其在国家尺度上的碎片监测和政策制定的适用性。这一关键的知识差距极大地阻碍了旨在控制中国地膜污染的循证政策的制定和有针对性的实施。地膜一度被视为提高农业生产力和水资源利用效率的突破,但现在被认为是中国农业系统中的一把双刃剑。这些限制强调了集成建模方法的必要性——Dai等人(2025)解决了这一差距。在《全球变化生物学》(Global Change Biology)发表的研究中,Dai等人(2025)提供了中国农田宏观塑料残留物(>; 5毫米)的全国清单,提供了1993年至2050年环境影响趋势的定量预测。他们的研究以综合数据集和方法稳健的建模为标志,是迄今为止中国农业塑料污染最详细和权威的量化研究。由于中国约占全球地膜消费量的68%,Dai等人(2025)通过整合3145个实地调查地点和30多年来的全国地膜使用统计数据,弥合了本地化经验观察与国家规模政策制定数据需求之间的差距。Dai等人(2025)实现了中国农田塑料污染负担的高分辨率时空量化。他们采用零截距线性回归模型来评估历史累积地膜使用与土壤中残留质量保留之间的关系。基于一个强大的经验数据集,他们的模型显示出广泛的适用性,并突出了三个明显的优势。首先,即使在没有全面抽样的情况下,该模型也将现有的实地观测结果与历史使用数据相结合,并有助于在全国范围内进行有效的县级外推。因此,该方法显著提高了空间覆盖和估计精度。其次,透明的零截距线性公式明确地捕捉了地膜投入与剩余积累之间的累积关系。该措施允许进行跨区域比较和政策响应模拟。第三,模型具有较强的动态预测能力。这使作者能够设计具有不同生物可降解覆盖物替换率的未来方案,并定量评估每种方案在减轻残留物积累趋势方面的潜在有效性。因此,通过整合科学评估、政策指导和风险预测,他们的研究呈现出一个有凝聚力的分析框架。这一建模范式在环境塑料污染源溯源方面取得了方法论上的突破,同时为推进全球农业塑料污染监测和管理提供了“中国解决方案”。此外,它还强调了一个典型的可持续性悖论:在使中国“多养活8500万人”的同时,地膜破坏了农业生产的生态基础。Dai等人(2025)强调了“零泄漏”的管理目标,同时警告不要误解“零使用”,从而为统一的区域强制塑料限制政策提供了更实用的替代方案。Dai等人。 (2025)不仅评估了目前农业土壤中的塑料污染水平,还预测了不同政策情景下的未来趋势,特别是研究了0%、20%、40%和60%的可生物降解地膜替代率。他们的研究结果提出了一个严重的警告:如果现有的做法保持不变,到2050年,累积的塑料残留物可能达到624万吨。通过整合政策驱动情景分析,本研究为决策提供了重要的实用价值和战略见解,从而支持中国农业从以数量为重点向以质量和可持续性为重点的转型。总之,Dai等人(2025)的研究利用跨学科合作、多尺度建模和数十年的经验数据,代表了农用塑料薄膜覆盖研究的重大飞跃。尽管数据限制和复杂的潜在过程带来了持续的挑战,但他们的研究通过采用标准化的抽样协议、透明的模型架构和稳健的情景分析,提高了科学的严谨性和政策相关性。建立全国地膜污染时空清查标志着中国农业非点源塑料污染系统治理迈出了关键一步,为有针对性的缓解措施提供了定量基础。未来,中国迫切需要国家政策和地膜控制技术来对抗微塑料污染,实现“零泄漏”管理。然而,在全国范围内确定高精度和长期地膜库存仍有差距。未来的研究应结合多源遥感数据、野外样本数据集和鲁棒算法,精确评估地膜废弃物,进一步了解土壤中残留迁移转化动态。此外,更厚(或可生物降解)的塑料薄膜、负担得起的机械、对塑料薄膜回收给予足够的经济奖励等政策实践也是减少塑料薄膜覆盖污染的可行措施。然而,控制地膜污染的运动涉及中国的几个国家部委和行政部门。政府的决策可能滞后于地膜污染的发展。因此,可能需要一个具有更有效制度框架的强大指导委员会来遏制和进一步扭转塑料薄膜覆盖污染,同时完善风险评估策略和响应框架,以促进针对特定区域的适应性农田塑料污染控制方法。张志东:数据整理、可视化、撰写-初稿、撰写-审稿、编辑。郭忠玲:经费筹措、研究方法、撰写、审稿与编辑。作者声明无利益冲突。本文是戴等人的特邀评论,https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70297。
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.