Decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors: CO₂ emission characteristics and mitigation pathways for steel, aluminum, and cement in China

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yuxing Yuan , Lei Zhang , Jingchao Sun , Su Yan , Tao Du , Hongming Na
{"title":"Decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors: CO₂ emission characteristics and mitigation pathways for steel, aluminum, and cement in China","authors":"Yuxing Yuan ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingchao Sun ,&nbsp;Su Yan ,&nbsp;Tao Du ,&nbsp;Hongming Na","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The steel, aluminum, and cement industries are among the most energy- and carbon-intensive sectors globally. Systematically identifying their carbon emission characteristics and key mitigation pathways is critical for achieving industrial low-carbon transitions. However, existing studies lack comprehensive comparative analyses of product-level CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and their driving factors across different technological routes, making decarbonization pathways for these high-emission industries unclear. This study adopts a material flow analysis approach to evaluate the unit product CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of six typical manufacturing processes in China's steel, aluminum, and cement industries. Results show that CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for crude steel production under the Blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace, hydrogen-based direct reduction iron, and Scrap-based electric arc furnace routes are 1891.92, 1198.66, and 759.24 kgCO₂/t-s respectively, while those for primary and secondary aluminum are 16,648.21 and 612.04 kgCO₂/t-al, respectively. Cement production emits 623.5 kgCO₂/t-c. In addition, scenario analysis indicates that by 2060, compared to 2023 levels, combined mitigation strategies could reduce China's emissions by 70%–90%. The steel industry should prioritize the development of hydrogen-based metallurgy and electric arc furnace technologies, the aluminum industry should accelerate the use of green electricity and increase the share of secondary aluminum, and the cement industry should strengthen the deployment of CCUS for achieving carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108568"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The steel, aluminum, and cement industries are among the most energy- and carbon-intensive sectors globally. Systematically identifying their carbon emission characteristics and key mitigation pathways is critical for achieving industrial low-carbon transitions. However, existing studies lack comprehensive comparative analyses of product-level CO2 emissions and their driving factors across different technological routes, making decarbonization pathways for these high-emission industries unclear. This study adopts a material flow analysis approach to evaluate the unit product CO2 emissions of six typical manufacturing processes in China's steel, aluminum, and cement industries. Results show that CO2 emissions for crude steel production under the Blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace, hydrogen-based direct reduction iron, and Scrap-based electric arc furnace routes are 1891.92, 1198.66, and 759.24 kgCO₂/t-s respectively, while those for primary and secondary aluminum are 16,648.21 and 612.04 kgCO₂/t-al, respectively. Cement production emits 623.5 kgCO₂/t-c. In addition, scenario analysis indicates that by 2060, compared to 2023 levels, combined mitigation strategies could reduce China's emissions by 70%–90%. The steel industry should prioritize the development of hydrogen-based metallurgy and electric arc furnace technologies, the aluminum industry should accelerate the use of green electricity and increase the share of secondary aluminum, and the cement industry should strengthen the deployment of CCUS for achieving carbon neutrality.
脱碳难减部门:中国钢铁、铝和水泥的CO₂排放特征和减缓途径
钢铁、铝和水泥行业是全球能源和碳密集度最高的行业。系统地确定其碳排放特征和关键的减缓途径对于实现工业低碳转型至关重要。然而,现有研究缺乏对不同工艺路线下产品级CO2排放及其驱动因素的综合比较分析,使得这些高排放行业的脱碳路径不明确。本研究采用物料流分析方法对中国钢铁、铝和水泥行业六个典型制造过程的单位产品CO2排放量进行了评估。结果表明:高炉-碱性氧炉、氢基直接还原铁和废钢电弧炉生产粗钢的CO2排放量分别为1891.92、1198.66和759.24 kgCO₂/t-s,原铝和二次铝的CO2排放量分别为16648.21和612.04 kgCO₂/t-al。水泥生产的排放量为623.5 kgco2 /t-c。此外,情景分析表明,到2060年,与2023年的水平相比,综合减缓战略可使中国的排放量减少70%-90%。钢铁行业应优先发展氢基冶金和电弧炉技术,铝行业应加快绿色电力的使用,提高二次铝的份额,水泥行业应加强CCUS的部署,实现碳中和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信