Exploring the impact of generative AI on student learning in accounting

Q1 Social Sciences
Aner Zhou, Yan Luo
{"title":"Exploring the impact of generative AI on student learning in accounting","authors":"Aner Zhou,&nbsp;Yan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming accounting practices and education. This study provides descriptive evidence regarding how accounting students currently engage with AI tools in their learning experience. Survey data from 259 accounting students and 126 non-accounting students at a four-year public university in the U.S. reveals that 80 % of students use AI at least about once a week or more, primarily for help with difficult concepts. Students introduced to AI from their peers and friends feel more encouraged to use it than the rest of the students. While accounting and non-accounting students share many similar usage patterns, accounting students are less likely to use AI for creativity tasks or to accept AI-generated outputs without questioning their accuracy, bias, or currency, especially when it comes to decision making. Among the accounting disciplines, students are more likely to use AI for AIS. Both accounting and non-accounting students believe AI is able to reduce repetitive tasks and perceive AI with a positive impact on their learning experience, including improving GPA, helping with knowledge acquisition, making learning more enjoyable, and saving learning time. Such perceived benefits do vary by usage frequency and student GPA. This study highlights the importance of incorporating AI into accounting education to enhance student learning experience. It complements prior research focusing on educators and professionals, offering insights from students’ perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 100982"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming accounting practices and education. This study provides descriptive evidence regarding how accounting students currently engage with AI tools in their learning experience. Survey data from 259 accounting students and 126 non-accounting students at a four-year public university in the U.S. reveals that 80 % of students use AI at least about once a week or more, primarily for help with difficult concepts. Students introduced to AI from their peers and friends feel more encouraged to use it than the rest of the students. While accounting and non-accounting students share many similar usage patterns, accounting students are less likely to use AI for creativity tasks or to accept AI-generated outputs without questioning their accuracy, bias, or currency, especially when it comes to decision making. Among the accounting disciplines, students are more likely to use AI for AIS. Both accounting and non-accounting students believe AI is able to reduce repetitive tasks and perceive AI with a positive impact on their learning experience, including improving GPA, helping with knowledge acquisition, making learning more enjoyable, and saving learning time. Such perceived benefits do vary by usage frequency and student GPA. This study highlights the importance of incorporating AI into accounting education to enhance student learning experience. It complements prior research focusing on educators and professionals, offering insights from students’ perspectives.
探索生成式人工智能对学生会计学习的影响
生成式人工智能(AI)的快速发展正在改变会计实践和教育。本研究提供了关于会计专业学生目前如何在学习过程中使用人工智能工具的描述性证据。对美国一所四年制公立大学259名会计专业学生和126名非会计专业学生的调查数据显示,80%的学生每周至少使用一次人工智能,主要是为了帮助解决困难的概念。从同伴和朋友那里了解人工智能的学生比其他学生更有动力使用它。虽然会计专业和非会计专业的学生有许多相似的使用模式,但会计专业的学生不太可能将人工智能用于创造性任务,或者在不质疑其准确性、偏见或时效性的情况下接受人工智能生成的输出,尤其是在决策方面。在会计学科中,学生更有可能将AI用于AIS。会计和非会计专业的学生都认为人工智能能够减少重复的任务,并认为人工智能对他们的学习体验有积极的影响,包括提高GPA,帮助知识获取,使学习更愉快,节省学习时间。这种感知到的好处确实因使用频率和学生的GPA而异。本研究强调了将人工智能纳入会计教育以提高学生学习体验的重要性。它补充了先前以教育工作者和专业人士为重点的研究,从学生的角度提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信