{"title":"Exploring the impact of generative AI on student learning in accounting","authors":"Aner Zhou, Yan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming accounting practices and education. This study provides descriptive evidence regarding how accounting students currently engage with AI tools in their learning experience. Survey data from 259 accounting students and 126 non-accounting students at a four-year public university in the U.S. reveals that 80 % of students use AI at least about once a week or more, primarily for help with difficult concepts. Students introduced to AI from their peers and friends feel more encouraged to use it than the rest of the students. While accounting and non-accounting students share many similar usage patterns, accounting students are less likely to use AI for creativity tasks or to accept AI-generated outputs without questioning their accuracy, bias, or currency, especially when it comes to decision making. Among the accounting disciplines, students are more likely to use AI for AIS. Both accounting and non-accounting students believe AI is able to reduce repetitive tasks and perceive AI with a positive impact on their learning experience, including improving GPA, helping with knowledge acquisition, making learning more enjoyable, and saving learning time. Such perceived benefits do vary by usage frequency and student GPA. This study highlights the importance of incorporating AI into accounting education to enhance student learning experience. It complements prior research focusing on educators and professionals, offering insights from students’ perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 100982"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming accounting practices and education. This study provides descriptive evidence regarding how accounting students currently engage with AI tools in their learning experience. Survey data from 259 accounting students and 126 non-accounting students at a four-year public university in the U.S. reveals that 80 % of students use AI at least about once a week or more, primarily for help with difficult concepts. Students introduced to AI from their peers and friends feel more encouraged to use it than the rest of the students. While accounting and non-accounting students share many similar usage patterns, accounting students are less likely to use AI for creativity tasks or to accept AI-generated outputs without questioning their accuracy, bias, or currency, especially when it comes to decision making. Among the accounting disciplines, students are more likely to use AI for AIS. Both accounting and non-accounting students believe AI is able to reduce repetitive tasks and perceive AI with a positive impact on their learning experience, including improving GPA, helping with knowledge acquisition, making learning more enjoyable, and saving learning time. Such perceived benefits do vary by usage frequency and student GPA. This study highlights the importance of incorporating AI into accounting education to enhance student learning experience. It complements prior research focusing on educators and professionals, offering insights from students’ perspectives.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.