Forms of rarity in vascular plants in the world's largest and most diverse seasonally dry tropical forest: challenges and opportunities for conservation in the Brazilian Caatinga
Paulo Weslem Portal Gomes , Giovani Carlos Andrella , Francisca Soares de Araújo , Eimear Nic Lughadha , Marcelo Freire Moro , Fernando Roberto Martins
{"title":"Forms of rarity in vascular plants in the world's largest and most diverse seasonally dry tropical forest: challenges and opportunities for conservation in the Brazilian Caatinga","authors":"Paulo Weslem Portal Gomes , Giovani Carlos Andrella , Francisca Soares de Araújo , Eimear Nic Lughadha , Marcelo Freire Moro , Fernando Roberto Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rare species face greater extinction risk, making their protection crucial for effective conservation planning. We classified the angiosperms of the Caatinga Dominion into Rabinowitz's rarity forms (RF) and assessed the adequacy of Protected Areas (PAs) in safeguarding these species. We also compared the RF of endemic species with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Of 2294 species analyzed, 1734 were rare: 1701 had scarce populations, 920 were habitat specialists, and 910 had narrow geographic distributions. Of the 296 endemic species, most were unassessed on the Red List, and only 29 were classified as threatened. Our ordinal and logistic regression models indicated that Rabinowitz's rarity index is not a good predictor of Red List category, nor do Red List categories predict rarity index values. We found only 228 species protected, 1073 partially protected, and 993 unprotected. Improved sampling inside PAs could reveal more protected species, making our estimates conservative. We recommend urgent measures to enhance Caatinga flora conservation, including expanding the PAs network to better represent formations rich in rare species and increasing targeted sampling efforts to address knowledge gaps that currently limit effective conservation planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 111460"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rare species face greater extinction risk, making their protection crucial for effective conservation planning. We classified the angiosperms of the Caatinga Dominion into Rabinowitz's rarity forms (RF) and assessed the adequacy of Protected Areas (PAs) in safeguarding these species. We also compared the RF of endemic species with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Of 2294 species analyzed, 1734 were rare: 1701 had scarce populations, 920 were habitat specialists, and 910 had narrow geographic distributions. Of the 296 endemic species, most were unassessed on the Red List, and only 29 were classified as threatened. Our ordinal and logistic regression models indicated that Rabinowitz's rarity index is not a good predictor of Red List category, nor do Red List categories predict rarity index values. We found only 228 species protected, 1073 partially protected, and 993 unprotected. Improved sampling inside PAs could reveal more protected species, making our estimates conservative. We recommend urgent measures to enhance Caatinga flora conservation, including expanding the PAs network to better represent formations rich in rare species and increasing targeted sampling efforts to address knowledge gaps that currently limit effective conservation planning.
期刊介绍:
Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.