Supporting the uncertainty of jobseekers: The impact of participative support on role ambiguity reduction and positive attitudes towards return to work

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Anthony Clain, Pierre De Oliveira, Brigitte Minondo-Kaghad, Edith Salès-Wuillemin
{"title":"Supporting the uncertainty of jobseekers: The impact of participative support on role ambiguity reduction and positive attitudes towards return to work","authors":"Anthony Clain,&nbsp;Pierre De Oliveira,&nbsp;Brigitte Minondo-Kaghad,&nbsp;Edith Salès-Wuillemin","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2024.101014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Job search is strongly associated with uncertainty and the mobilization of psychological resources. Existing evidence suggests that the nature of support provided by counsellors holds the potential to effectively manage this uncertainty. However, the literature presents seemingly contradictory viewpoints. In the face of uncertainty, should one lean towards directive support, or is the promotion of autonomy through participative support a more viable approach.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to investigate whether the perceived type of support influences factors conducive to return to work and whether this association is mediated by the capacity of participative support to regulate uncertainty among jobseekers.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study involved 94 jobseekers who completed a questionnaire that included measures of leadership (directive/participative), uncertainty (role ambiguity), and factors conducive to return to work (e.g., motivation to work, self-efficacy, job search behaviours).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results confirm the hypotheses: only perceived participative support is associated with greater motivation to work and self-efficacy among jobseekers. Additionally, the impact of participative support on the expression of autonomous motivation is found to be mediated by the reduction of uncertainty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results are discussed within the framework of leadership approaches in uncertain situations and the context of organizational change. The implications shed light on the dynamics of support types in the job-seeking process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 5","pages":"Article 101014"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908824000458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Job search is strongly associated with uncertainty and the mobilization of psychological resources. Existing evidence suggests that the nature of support provided by counsellors holds the potential to effectively manage this uncertainty. However, the literature presents seemingly contradictory viewpoints. In the face of uncertainty, should one lean towards directive support, or is the promotion of autonomy through participative support a more viable approach.

Objective

This study aims to investigate whether the perceived type of support influences factors conducive to return to work and whether this association is mediated by the capacity of participative support to regulate uncertainty among jobseekers.

Method

The study involved 94 jobseekers who completed a questionnaire that included measures of leadership (directive/participative), uncertainty (role ambiguity), and factors conducive to return to work (e.g., motivation to work, self-efficacy, job search behaviours).

Results

The results confirm the hypotheses: only perceived participative support is associated with greater motivation to work and self-efficacy among jobseekers. Additionally, the impact of participative support on the expression of autonomous motivation is found to be mediated by the reduction of uncertainty.

Conclusion

The results are discussed within the framework of leadership approaches in uncertain situations and the context of organizational change. The implications shed light on the dynamics of support types in the job-seeking process.
支持求职者的不确定性:参与性支持对减少角色模糊性和积极重返工作的影响
求职与不确定性和心理资源的调动密切相关。现有证据表明,辅导员提供的支持的性质具有有效管理这种不确定性的潜力。然而,文献提出了看似矛盾的观点。面对不确定性,人们应该倾向于直接支持,还是通过参与性支持来促进自主权是一种更可行的方法?目的探讨支持的感知类型是否会影响求职者重返工作的因素,以及参与性支持调节求职者不确定性的能力是否在这种关联中起中介作用。方法对94名求职者进行问卷调查,问卷内容包括领导力(指导性/参与性)、不确定性(角色模糊性)和有利于重返工作岗位的因素(如工作动机、自我效能感、求职行为)。结果结果证实了假设:在求职者中,只有感知到的参与性支持与更高的工作动机和自我效能感相关。此外,研究发现参与性支持对自主动机表达的影响以不确定性的减少为中介。结论在不确定情境和组织变革背景下的领导方法框架内讨论了研究结果。其含义揭示了求职过程中支持类型的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信