Comparison of corneal biomechanics in post-smile, post-LASEK, and normal eyes with Brillouin microscopy

IF 1.8 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yanze Yu , Jian Cao , Yong Ma , Yongle Bao , Lingling Niu , Xiaoying Wang , Xingtao Zhou , Jing Zhao
{"title":"Comparison of corneal biomechanics in post-smile, post-LASEK, and normal eyes with Brillouin microscopy","authors":"Yanze Yu ,&nbsp;Jian Cao ,&nbsp;Yong Ma ,&nbsp;Yongle Bao ,&nbsp;Lingling Niu ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Wang ,&nbsp;Xingtao Zhou ,&nbsp;Jing Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To characterize corneal biomechanics in post-small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), post-laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), and normal eyes using Brillouin microscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included myopic patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery (SMILE or LASEK) at least 1 month prior to ensure corneal stability. A total of 177 eyes (79 post-SMILE, 24 post-LASEK, and 74 untreated normal eyes) from 177 patients were evaluated using Pentacam HR and Brillouin microscopy for morphological and biomechanical assessment, respectively. Among them, 30 eyes (20 post-SMILE and 10 post-LASEK) from 30 participants underwent both pre- and post-operative Brillouin and Pentacam examinations, enabling within-subject comparisons. Corneal biomechanics were assessed using Brillouin modulus (BM), where lower values indicate weaker biomechanical properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in Central BM, Mean BM, or Max BM among the groups. Compared with the normal eyes, Min BM was significantly lower in the post-SMILE and post-LASEK groups (<em>P</em> = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively) and Max–Min BM significantly increased after SMILE and LASEK (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In post-SMILE corneas, standardized deviation BM was significantly higher than in normal corneas (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Within-subjects comparisons (pre- vs post-operation) further confirmed above results. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a negative correlation between Central BM and post-operative corneal thickness in post-SMILE corneas (coefficient = –0.016, <em>P</em> = 0.025). In the post-LASEK group, Max-Min BM showed a positive correlation with mean corneal curvature (coefficient = 0.031, <em>P</em> = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SMILE and LASEK can induce localized changes in corneal biomechanics, as observed by Brillouin microscopy, while maintaining overall corneal biomechanics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 4","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429625000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize corneal biomechanics in post-small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), post-laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), and normal eyes using Brillouin microscopy.

Methods

This study included myopic patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery (SMILE or LASEK) at least 1 month prior to ensure corneal stability. A total of 177 eyes (79 post-SMILE, 24 post-LASEK, and 74 untreated normal eyes) from 177 patients were evaluated using Pentacam HR and Brillouin microscopy for morphological and biomechanical assessment, respectively. Among them, 30 eyes (20 post-SMILE and 10 post-LASEK) from 30 participants underwent both pre- and post-operative Brillouin and Pentacam examinations, enabling within-subject comparisons. Corneal biomechanics were assessed using Brillouin modulus (BM), where lower values indicate weaker biomechanical properties.

Results

No significant differences were observed in Central BM, Mean BM, or Max BM among the groups. Compared with the normal eyes, Min BM was significantly lower in the post-SMILE and post-LASEK groups (P = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively) and Max–Min BM significantly increased after SMILE and LASEK (both P < 0.001). In post-SMILE corneas, standardized deviation BM was significantly higher than in normal corneas (P < 0.001). Within-subjects comparisons (pre- vs post-operation) further confirmed above results. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a negative correlation between Central BM and post-operative corneal thickness in post-SMILE corneas (coefficient = –0.016, P = 0.025). In the post-LASEK group, Max-Min BM showed a positive correlation with mean corneal curvature (coefficient = 0.031, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

SMILE and LASEK can induce localized changes in corneal biomechanics, as observed by Brillouin microscopy, while maintaining overall corneal biomechanics.
用布里渊显微镜观察微笑后、lasek后和正常眼角膜生物力学的比较
目的应用布里渊显微镜观察小切口角膜晶状体摘除术(SMILE)、激光辅助上皮下角膜移植术(LASEK)和正常眼的角膜生物力学特征。方法本研究纳入至少1个月前接受角膜屈光手术(SMILE或LASEK)以确保角膜稳定性的近视患者。采用Pentacam HR和Brillouin显微镜对177例患者的177只眼(79只术后smile, 24只术后lasek, 74只未治疗的正常眼)进行形态学和生物力学评估。其中,来自30名参与者的30只眼睛(20只在smile后,10只在lasek后)进行了术前和术后布里渊和Pentacam检查,以便进行受试者内比较。使用布里渊模量(BM)评估角膜生物力学,数值越低表明生物力学性能越弱。结果各组间中央脑膜厚度、平均脑膜厚度和最大脑膜厚度均无显著差异。与正常眼相比,SMILE组和LASEK组的Min BM显著降低(P分别为0.004和0.002),SMILE组和LASEK组的Max-Min BM显著升高(P均为0.001)。smile术后角膜的标准偏差BM显著高于正常角膜(P < 0.001)。受试者内比较(术前与术后)进一步证实了上述结果。多元线性回归分析显示,smile术后角膜中央BM与术后角膜厚度呈负相关(系数= -0.016,P = 0.025)。在lasek术后组,Max-Min BM与平均角膜曲率呈正相关(系数= 0.031,P = 0.001)。结论smile和LASEK在维持角膜整体生物力学的同时,可引起角膜局部生物力学的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信