The Intergroup Time Bias and Its Implications for Medical Healthcare

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Emerson Do Bú, Renata Pimentel da Silva, Cícero Roberto Pereira, Ana Raquel Rosas Torres, Filipa Madeira, Jorge Vala, Nao Hagiwara
{"title":"The Intergroup Time Bias and Its Implications for Medical Healthcare","authors":"Emerson Do Bú,&nbsp;Renata Pimentel da Silva,&nbsp;Cícero Roberto Pereira,&nbsp;Ana Raquel Rosas Torres,&nbsp;Filipa Madeira,&nbsp;Jorge Vala,&nbsp;Nao Hagiwara","doi":"10.1111/josi.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Intergroup Time Bias (ITB) is an unobtrusive yet impactful form of discrimination, characterized by the unequal allocation of time, favoring White individuals compared to Black individuals. This biased time allocation has significant implications for racial inequities in critical social domains, including healthcare. Across three studies, we demonstrate the ITB as a pervasive factor contributing to racial healthcare disparities. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 166 patients, <i>N</i> = 9 physicians) examined real-world clinical interactions in Brazil, revealing that White physicians consistently spent more time with White patients than Black patients across multiple medical specialties. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 210) extended these findings to Portugal through a vignette study, where White medical trainees spent significantly more time to clinical tasks involving a White (vs. Black) patient, leading to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and more comprehensive clinical recommendations for the White patient. Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 99) explored additional ITB consequences, specifically medical trainees’ written email communication to patients in Portugal, using the same clinical scenario as Study 2. Consistent with Study 2, trainees spent significantly more time on clinical tasks involving a White (vs. Black) patient, which translated into higher quality written communication for the White patient. Notably, trainees who scored high on implicit racial bias but low on explicit racial bias (i.e., aversive racists) showed stronger ITB than those with high implicit and explicit racial bias (i.e., prejudiced) or low implicit and explicit racial bias (i.e., non-prejudiced). This research represents work in T1, with a goal to establish proof of concept, through observational and experimental studies, on the critical role that ITB plays in contributing to racial healthcare disparities. Future T2–T4 research is needed to understand how the ITB manifests in multiple aspects of patient care in the actual clinical settings, test interventions to reduce it, and refine these interventions for broader effectiveness.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Intergroup Time Bias (ITB) is an unobtrusive yet impactful form of discrimination, characterized by the unequal allocation of time, favoring White individuals compared to Black individuals. This biased time allocation has significant implications for racial inequities in critical social domains, including healthcare. Across three studies, we demonstrate the ITB as a pervasive factor contributing to racial healthcare disparities. Study 1 (N = 166 patients, N = 9 physicians) examined real-world clinical interactions in Brazil, revealing that White physicians consistently spent more time with White patients than Black patients across multiple medical specialties. Study 2 (N = 210) extended these findings to Portugal through a vignette study, where White medical trainees spent significantly more time to clinical tasks involving a White (vs. Black) patient, leading to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and more comprehensive clinical recommendations for the White patient. Study 3 (N = 99) explored additional ITB consequences, specifically medical trainees’ written email communication to patients in Portugal, using the same clinical scenario as Study 2. Consistent with Study 2, trainees spent significantly more time on clinical tasks involving a White (vs. Black) patient, which translated into higher quality written communication for the White patient. Notably, trainees who scored high on implicit racial bias but low on explicit racial bias (i.e., aversive racists) showed stronger ITB than those with high implicit and explicit racial bias (i.e., prejudiced) or low implicit and explicit racial bias (i.e., non-prejudiced). This research represents work in T1, with a goal to establish proof of concept, through observational and experimental studies, on the critical role that ITB plays in contributing to racial healthcare disparities. Future T2–T4 research is needed to understand how the ITB manifests in multiple aspects of patient care in the actual clinical settings, test interventions to reduce it, and refine these interventions for broader effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

群体间时间偏差及其对医疗保健的影响
群体间时间偏见(ITB)是一种不引人注目但影响深远的歧视形式,其特征是时间分配不平等,白人比黑人更受青睐。这种有偏见的时间分配对包括医疗保健在内的关键社会领域的种族不平等具有重大影响。在三项研究中,我们证明了ITB是导致种族医疗差异的普遍因素。研究1 (N = 166名患者,N = 9名医生)检查了巴西现实世界的临床互动,揭示了白人医生在多个医学专业中与白人患者相处的时间始终比黑人患者多。研究2 (N = 210)通过一项小样本研究将这些发现扩展到葡萄牙,白人医学实习生在涉及白人(与黑人)患者的临床任务上花费的时间明显更多,从而提高了诊断准确性,并为白人患者提供了更全面的临床建议。研究3 (N = 99)使用与研究2相同的临床场景,探讨了额外的ITB后果,特别是葡萄牙医学实习生与患者的书面电子邮件沟通。与研究2一致,受训人员在涉及白人患者(与黑人患者相比)的临床任务上花费的时间明显更多,这转化为白人患者更高质量的书面交流。值得注意的是,内隐种族偏见得分高而外显种族偏见得分低的学员(即厌恶种族主义者)比内隐和外显种族偏见得分高(即有偏见)或内隐和外显种族偏见得分低(即无偏见)的学员表现出更强的ITB。这项研究代表了T1的工作,目的是通过观察和实验研究,建立关于ITB在促进种族医疗差异方面发挥关键作用的概念证明。未来的T2-T4研究需要了解ITB在实际临床环境中如何在患者护理的多个方面表现出来,测试干预措施以减少它,并完善这些干预措施以获得更广泛的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信