Problems and Solutions when Quantifying Nitrogen in Silicate and Oxide Minerals and Glasses Using Electron Probe Microanalysis

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Eleanor R. Mare, Jeff Chen, Iris Buisman, Chris Hayward, Antony D. Burnham, Caterina Melai, Eva E. Stüeken, Geoffrey Bromiley, Sami Mikhail
{"title":"Problems and Solutions when Quantifying Nitrogen in Silicate and Oxide Minerals and Glasses Using Electron Probe Microanalysis","authors":"Eleanor R. Mare,&nbsp;Jeff Chen,&nbsp;Iris Buisman,&nbsp;Chris Hayward,&nbsp;Antony D. Burnham,&nbsp;Caterina Melai,&nbsp;Eva E. Stüeken,&nbsp;Geoffrey Bromiley,&nbsp;Sami Mikhail","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With growing interest in the Earth's deep nitrogen cycle, electron probe microanalysis is increasingly used to quantify nitrogen in minerals and glasses. However, measuring nitrogen by electron microprobe comes with challenges, including beam sensitivity and differences in peak and background shapes between sample and reference materials. This study provides a robust analytical protocol to addresses these issues. We gathered mineral and glass reference materials with known nitrogen mass fractions from previous work, and synthesised additional glasses with nitrogen quantified independently by gas-source mass spectrometry. Our method uses nitrides as calibration materials because of their beam stability and high nitrogen mass fraction. We assess peak shapes to implement an area-peak factor correction, and account for curved backgrounds using a four-point background correction. Importantly, we describe how to estimate uncertainties on both background and area-peak factor corrections, which is required to assess detection limits but has been largely overlooked in previous studies. Our method yields nitrogen mass fractions within uncertainty for five out of seven reference materials, with two exceptions highlighting the need for further refinement. We provide Python code for applying the corrections and calculating uncertainties, allowing our method to be implemented by any researcher with access to an electron microprobe laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"49 3","pages":"569-590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12605","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With growing interest in the Earth's deep nitrogen cycle, electron probe microanalysis is increasingly used to quantify nitrogen in minerals and glasses. However, measuring nitrogen by electron microprobe comes with challenges, including beam sensitivity and differences in peak and background shapes between sample and reference materials. This study provides a robust analytical protocol to addresses these issues. We gathered mineral and glass reference materials with known nitrogen mass fractions from previous work, and synthesised additional glasses with nitrogen quantified independently by gas-source mass spectrometry. Our method uses nitrides as calibration materials because of their beam stability and high nitrogen mass fraction. We assess peak shapes to implement an area-peak factor correction, and account for curved backgrounds using a four-point background correction. Importantly, we describe how to estimate uncertainties on both background and area-peak factor corrections, which is required to assess detection limits but has been largely overlooked in previous studies. Our method yields nitrogen mass fractions within uncertainty for five out of seven reference materials, with two exceptions highlighting the need for further refinement. We provide Python code for applying the corrections and calculating uncertainties, allowing our method to be implemented by any researcher with access to an electron microprobe laboratory.

Abstract Image

应用电子探针微量分析定量硅酸盐、氧化矿物和玻璃中氮的问题及解决方法
随着人们对地球深层氮循环的兴趣日益浓厚,电子探针微分析越来越多地用于量化矿物和玻璃中的氮。然而,通过电子探针测量氮存在挑战,包括样品和参考材料之间的光束灵敏度和峰和背景形状的差异。本研究为解决这些问题提供了一个可靠的分析方案。我们从以前的工作中收集了含有已知氮质量分数的矿物和玻璃参比物质,并合成了额外的含氮玻璃,通过气源质谱法独立定量。我们的方法使用氮化物作为校准材料,因为它们具有光束稳定性和高氮质量分数。我们评估峰值形状以实现面积-峰值因子校正,并使用四点背景校正来解释弯曲背景。重要的是,我们描述了如何估计背景和面积峰因子校正的不确定性,这是评估检测限所必需的,但在以前的研究中很大程度上被忽视了。我们的方法在不确定度内对七种参考物质中的五种产生氮质量分数,有两个例外强调需要进一步改进。我们提供了用于应用校正和计算不确定度的Python代码,允许任何访问电子显微探针实验室的研究人员实现我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信