The seismogenic structure and dynamic origins of the 2023 Qingpu ML3.7 earthquake

IF 2.1 4区 地球科学
Suxiang Zhang, Shuzhong Sheng, Yinglei Dai, Ce Feng, Jinlei Li, Xiuqing Song
{"title":"The seismogenic structure and dynamic origins of the 2023 Qingpu ML3.7 earthquake","authors":"Suxiang Zhang,&nbsp;Shuzhong Sheng,&nbsp;Yinglei Dai,&nbsp;Ce Feng,&nbsp;Jinlei Li,&nbsp;Xiuqing Song","doi":"10.1007/s11600-025-01596-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On June 15, 2023, a significant <span>\\({M}_{\\text{L}}\\)</span>3.7 earthquake occurred in the Qingpu District of Shanghai, China. This event holds particular importance as the inland areas of Shanghai have not previously recorded earthquakes above <span>\\({M}_{\\text{L}}\\)</span>3.5. To investigate the seismogenic structure of this earthquake and its relation to the tectonic stress field in the region, our study initially utilized the FOCMEC and HASH methods to invert the focal mechanism solutions for this earthquake, establishing credible centroid solution based on these results. Subsequently, leveraging previous research on the stress field in the southern Jiangsu region, we computed the corresponding maximum horizontal principal stress direction and compared it with the principal strain rate direction in the Qingpu area, as well as the fast wave polarization direction of shear wave splitting, thereby obtaining a reliable regional stress field for Qingpu area. Lastly, projecting the regional stress field onto the two nodal planes of the <span>\\({M}_{\\text{L}}\\)</span>3.7 earthquake's centroid solution, we obtained relative shear and normal stress values and determined the theoretical seismogenic plane. Based on the identified seismogenic plane, this study relocates the depth of the seismic source and projects the source onto the longitudinal profile of the S-wave velocity structure of the seismogenic structure to obtain its seismogenic environment. The final results are as follows: (1) The centroid solution for the focal mechanism of the <span>\\({M}_{\\text{L}}\\)</span>3.7 earthquake indicates a strike of 26.2°, a dip of 86.0°, and a rake angle of 159.8° for fault plane I, and a strike of 117.7°, a dip of 69.8°, and a rake angle of 4.2° for fault plane II, suggesting a strike-slip earthquake. (2) In the study area, the azimuth of the maximum principal stress axis is northeast (NE), with a near-horizontal plunge, while the azimuth of the minimum principal stress axis is northwest (NW), with a vertical plunge, indicating a predominantly compressional stress regime, typical of a strike-slip stress state. (3) The relative shear and normal stress values on fault plane I are 0.827 and 0.365, respectively, while on fault plane II, they are 0.871 and − 0.623, respectively, indicating that fault plane I is the theoretical seismogenic fault plane. By considering the geological structural characteristics around the earthquake location, the orientation of the major axis of isoseismal, and the fault parameters of the theoretical seismogenic plane, it is inferred that the seismogenic fault for this earthquake is the NNE-oriented Yaojiagang-Baihe fault, with the theoretical seismogenic plane being the actual seismogenic plane. (4) The earthquake was repositioned to a depth of 6.6 km, and the location was at the junction of high and low velocities of the Yaojiagang-Baihe fault, which possesses the media conditions for the accumulation of a large amount of strain energy and is susceptible to rupture and stress release. (5) The <span>\\({M}_{\\text{L}}\\)</span>3.7 earthquake in Qingpu, Shanghai, occurred on the fault plane where the maximum shear stress is released under the influence of the tectonic stress field, representing a normal release of accumulated stress. The likelihood of small to moderate earthquakes occurring again in the vicinity in the short term is low. This study provides valuable insights into the seismogenic structure and dynamic origins of the <span>\\({M}_{\\text{L}}\\)</span>3.7 earthquake in Qingpu, Shanghai. The research findings can serve as a reference for subsequent seismic hazard assessments and zoning for earthquake defense in the Shanghai area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 5","pages":"3799 - 3809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-025-01596-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On June 15, 2023, a significant \({M}_{\text{L}}\)3.7 earthquake occurred in the Qingpu District of Shanghai, China. This event holds particular importance as the inland areas of Shanghai have not previously recorded earthquakes above \({M}_{\text{L}}\)3.5. To investigate the seismogenic structure of this earthquake and its relation to the tectonic stress field in the region, our study initially utilized the FOCMEC and HASH methods to invert the focal mechanism solutions for this earthquake, establishing credible centroid solution based on these results. Subsequently, leveraging previous research on the stress field in the southern Jiangsu region, we computed the corresponding maximum horizontal principal stress direction and compared it with the principal strain rate direction in the Qingpu area, as well as the fast wave polarization direction of shear wave splitting, thereby obtaining a reliable regional stress field for Qingpu area. Lastly, projecting the regional stress field onto the two nodal planes of the \({M}_{\text{L}}\)3.7 earthquake's centroid solution, we obtained relative shear and normal stress values and determined the theoretical seismogenic plane. Based on the identified seismogenic plane, this study relocates the depth of the seismic source and projects the source onto the longitudinal profile of the S-wave velocity structure of the seismogenic structure to obtain its seismogenic environment. The final results are as follows: (1) The centroid solution for the focal mechanism of the \({M}_{\text{L}}\)3.7 earthquake indicates a strike of 26.2°, a dip of 86.0°, and a rake angle of 159.8° for fault plane I, and a strike of 117.7°, a dip of 69.8°, and a rake angle of 4.2° for fault plane II, suggesting a strike-slip earthquake. (2) In the study area, the azimuth of the maximum principal stress axis is northeast (NE), with a near-horizontal plunge, while the azimuth of the minimum principal stress axis is northwest (NW), with a vertical plunge, indicating a predominantly compressional stress regime, typical of a strike-slip stress state. (3) The relative shear and normal stress values on fault plane I are 0.827 and 0.365, respectively, while on fault plane II, they are 0.871 and − 0.623, respectively, indicating that fault plane I is the theoretical seismogenic fault plane. By considering the geological structural characteristics around the earthquake location, the orientation of the major axis of isoseismal, and the fault parameters of the theoretical seismogenic plane, it is inferred that the seismogenic fault for this earthquake is the NNE-oriented Yaojiagang-Baihe fault, with the theoretical seismogenic plane being the actual seismogenic plane. (4) The earthquake was repositioned to a depth of 6.6 km, and the location was at the junction of high and low velocities of the Yaojiagang-Baihe fault, which possesses the media conditions for the accumulation of a large amount of strain energy and is susceptible to rupture and stress release. (5) The \({M}_{\text{L}}\)3.7 earthquake in Qingpu, Shanghai, occurred on the fault plane where the maximum shear stress is released under the influence of the tectonic stress field, representing a normal release of accumulated stress. The likelihood of small to moderate earthquakes occurring again in the vicinity in the short term is low. This study provides valuable insights into the seismogenic structure and dynamic origins of the \({M}_{\text{L}}\)3.7 earthquake in Qingpu, Shanghai. The research findings can serve as a reference for subsequent seismic hazard assessments and zoning for earthquake defense in the Shanghai area.

2023年青浦ML3.7地震发震构造与动力来源
2023年6月15日,中国上海青浦区发生\({M}_{\text{L}}\) 3.7级大地震。此次地震具有特别重要的意义,因为上海内陆地区以前没有记录到\({M}_{\text{L}}\) 3.5以上的地震。为研究本次地震的发震构造及其与区域构造应力场的关系,本研究首次利用FOCMEC和HASH方法反演了本次地震的震源机制解,并在此基础上建立了可信的质心解。随后,利用前人对苏南地区应力场的研究,计算出相应的最大水平主应力方向,并与青浦地区的主应变速率方向以及横波分裂的快波极化方向进行对比,得到青浦地区可靠的区域应力场。最后,将区域应力场投影到\({M}_{\text{L}}\) 3.7地震质心解的两个节点面上,得到了相对剪应力和正应力值,确定了理论发震面。在确定的孕震平面基础上,重新定位震源深度,并将震源投影到孕震构造的s波速度结构纵剖面上,得到其孕震环境。结果表明:(1)\({M}_{\text{L}}\) 3.7级地震震源机制质心解表明,ⅰ断裂面走向26.2°、倾角86.0°、前倾角159.8°,ⅱ断裂面走向117.7°、倾角69.8°、前倾角4.2°,为走滑地震。(2)研究区最大主应力轴方位角为东北(NE),呈近水平倾缩;最小主应力轴方位角为西北(NW),呈垂直倾缩,以挤压应力为主,为典型的走滑应力状态。(3)ⅰ断裂面相对剪应力和正应力分别为0.827和0.365,ⅱ断裂面相对剪应力和正应力分别为0.871和- 0.623,表明ⅰ断裂面为理论发震断裂面。综合考虑震位周边地质构造特征、等震长轴走向及理论发震面断层参数,推断本次地震的发震断层为北北东向姚家岗-白河断层,理论发震面为实际发震面。(4)将地震重新定位至6.6 km深度,位置位于姚家岗-白河断裂高低速交界处,具备大量应变能积累的介质条件,易发生破裂和应力释放。(5)上海青浦\({M}_{\text{L}}\) 3.7地震发生在构造应力场影响下最大剪应力释放的断裂面上,为正常的累积应力释放。短期内该地区再次发生小到中等地震的可能性很低。本研究对上海青浦\({M}_{\text{L}}\) 3.7地震的发震构造和动力成因提供了有价值的认识。研究结果可为上海地区后续的地震危险性评价和防震区划提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信