An in-depth interview study of women's perspectives on the effects of contraceptive use on future fertility in Ethiopia and Kenya

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kristen Kirksey , Hanna Feleke , Sarah Okumu , Hailemichael Bizuneh , Pauline Wekesa , Lauren Suchman , Beth Phillips , Zachary Kwena , Jenny Liu , Elizabeth Bukusi , Serah Gitome , Ewenat Gebrehanna , Kelsey Holt
{"title":"An in-depth interview study of women's perspectives on the effects of contraceptive use on future fertility in Ethiopia and Kenya","authors":"Kristen Kirksey ,&nbsp;Hanna Feleke ,&nbsp;Sarah Okumu ,&nbsp;Hailemichael Bizuneh ,&nbsp;Pauline Wekesa ,&nbsp;Lauren Suchman ,&nbsp;Beth Phillips ,&nbsp;Zachary Kwena ,&nbsp;Jenny Liu ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bukusi ,&nbsp;Serah Gitome ,&nbsp;Ewenat Gebrehanna ,&nbsp;Kelsey Holt","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Infertility is a common perceived side effect of contraceptive use among women in sub-Saharan Africa, and fear of infertility can affect contraceptive choices. While no choice is inherently negative, it is critical that women have accurate information about side effects to ensure contraceptive decision-making agency. Despite the prevalence of infertility fears, little is known about women's specific beliefs, where they originate, and how they inform contraceptive decisions. We sought to fill this gap in Kenya and Ethiopia through in-depth interviews with women aged 15–45 in Nairobi and Kisumu, Kenya, and Addis Ababa and North Shoa Zone of Amhara Region, Ethiopia (N = 83). We utilized a modified grounded theory approach for data collection and analysis.</div><div>While not all participants believed in a link between contraception and infertility, those that did understood several mechanisms. Some, such as delayed return to fertility and aging out of childbearing years, were supported by clinical evidence. Others, such as accumulation of harmful substances in the body, damage to the reproductive system, and negative effects from early or prolonged use, were not supported by clinical evidence. Healthcare providers were a trusted source of information, disseminating information supported and unsupported by clinical evidence. Fear of infertility led women to prefer non-hormonal or short-term methods, avoid methods that cause amenorrhea, or delay use until after having children.</div><div>Results suggest the need to address side effect misinformation given by providers. Further, the specificity this study offers can inform strategies to improve contraceptive counseling and education campaigns in service of decision-making agency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infertility is a common perceived side effect of contraceptive use among women in sub-Saharan Africa, and fear of infertility can affect contraceptive choices. While no choice is inherently negative, it is critical that women have accurate information about side effects to ensure contraceptive decision-making agency. Despite the prevalence of infertility fears, little is known about women's specific beliefs, where they originate, and how they inform contraceptive decisions. We sought to fill this gap in Kenya and Ethiopia through in-depth interviews with women aged 15–45 in Nairobi and Kisumu, Kenya, and Addis Ababa and North Shoa Zone of Amhara Region, Ethiopia (N = 83). We utilized a modified grounded theory approach for data collection and analysis.
While not all participants believed in a link between contraception and infertility, those that did understood several mechanisms. Some, such as delayed return to fertility and aging out of childbearing years, were supported by clinical evidence. Others, such as accumulation of harmful substances in the body, damage to the reproductive system, and negative effects from early or prolonged use, were not supported by clinical evidence. Healthcare providers were a trusted source of information, disseminating information supported and unsupported by clinical evidence. Fear of infertility led women to prefer non-hormonal or short-term methods, avoid methods that cause amenorrhea, or delay use until after having children.
Results suggest the need to address side effect misinformation given by providers. Further, the specificity this study offers can inform strategies to improve contraceptive counseling and education campaigns in service of decision-making agency.
关于妇女对埃塞俄比亚和肯尼亚使用避孕药具对未来生育率影响的看法的深入访谈研究
不孕症是撒哈拉以南非洲妇女使用避孕药具的常见副作用,对不孕症的恐惧会影响避孕药具的选择。虽然没有任何选择本身是消极的,但重要的是,妇女必须掌握有关副作用的准确信息,以确保避孕决策机构。尽管对不孕症的恐惧普遍存在,但人们对女性的具体信仰、它们的来源以及它们如何影响避孕决定知之甚少。我们试图通过对肯尼亚内罗毕和基苏木以及埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区亚的斯亚贝巴和北肖亚区的15-45岁妇女进行深入访谈来填补肯尼亚和埃塞俄比亚的这一空白(N = 83)。我们使用了一种改进的扎根理论方法进行数据收集和分析。虽然不是所有的参与者都相信避孕和不孕症之间的联系,但那些相信的人了解一些机制。有些,如延迟恢复生育能力和超过生育年龄,是有临床证据支持的。其他的,如有害物质在体内的积累,对生殖系统的损害,以及早期或长期使用的负面影响,没有临床证据支持。医疗保健提供者是可信赖的信息来源,传播的信息有临床证据支持,也有临床证据不支持。对不孕的恐惧导致女性更喜欢非激素或短期的方法,避免导致闭经的方法,或者推迟到生完孩子后再使用。结果表明,有必要解决由提供者提供的副作用错误信息。此外,本研究提供的特殊性可以为决策机构提供改进避孕咨询和教育活动的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信