Lacustrine shale oil systems in China: Advances in characterization methods and resource accumulation models

IF 10 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xusheng Guo , Enze Wang , Xiaoxiao Ma , Maowen Li , Menhui Qian , Tingting Cao , Zhiming Li , Junjie Chu
{"title":"Lacustrine shale oil systems in China: Advances in characterization methods and resource accumulation models","authors":"Xusheng Guo ,&nbsp;Enze Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoxiao Ma ,&nbsp;Maowen Li ,&nbsp;Menhui Qian ,&nbsp;Tingting Cao ,&nbsp;Zhiming Li ,&nbsp;Junjie Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lacustrine shale oil is an important replacement for conventional oil and gas in China, yet it differs markedly from North American marine shales, exhibiting stronger heterogeneity both between stratigraphic intervals and within beds. Such variability demands high-density sampling, but conventional reservoir testing and sampling methods may be inefficient and yield biased results. The applicability of marine shale exploration models to lacustrine systems also remains uncertain, and a unified enrichment framework is lacking. This study: 1) investigates the lithofacies and organic facies of different lacustrine shale systems; 2) reviews advances in characterizing the four key properties of shale (storage capacity, oil content and mobility, and fracability); 3) synthesizes recent insights into shale oil occurrence, flow, and enrichment; 4) classifies lacustrine shale plays by source–reservoir configuration; 5) identifies geological sweet spots under different tectonic–sedimentary conditions; and 6) establishes corresponding enrichment models. Results show that freshwater lacustrine basins, with substantial terrigenous input, mainly develop siliceous–argillaceous shales or fine sandstone–siltstone lithofacies, whereas saline systems dominated by endogenous deposition favor carbonate-rich lithofacies. Organic matter enrichment is primarily controlled by high primary productivity in freshwater lakes and by selective preservation in saline lakes. Tailored techniques such as magnetic fluid volume measurement, portable X-ray fluorescence, and multistep pyrolysis improve the accuracy of key geological parameters. Organic matter content and kerogen–hydrocarbon interactions are the main controls on oil retention, while oil mobility is influenced by organic–inorganic coupling, pore structure, pressure gradients, and fluid properties. Fundamentally, enrichment mechanisms are similar in marine and lacustrine shales, differing mainly in their macroscopic expressions. Based on the source–reservoir configuration, lacustrine shale plays can be categorized into three types: (1) source-storage separation on meter-scale, (2) source-storage coexistence on centimeter- to millimeter-scale, and (3) source-storage integration on sub-millimeter-scale. Low–medium maturity integration plays in saline settings show the greatest exploration potential, while analogous plays in freshwater systems require high thermal maturity and favorable preservation conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 105256"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001282522500217X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lacustrine shale oil is an important replacement for conventional oil and gas in China, yet it differs markedly from North American marine shales, exhibiting stronger heterogeneity both between stratigraphic intervals and within beds. Such variability demands high-density sampling, but conventional reservoir testing and sampling methods may be inefficient and yield biased results. The applicability of marine shale exploration models to lacustrine systems also remains uncertain, and a unified enrichment framework is lacking. This study: 1) investigates the lithofacies and organic facies of different lacustrine shale systems; 2) reviews advances in characterizing the four key properties of shale (storage capacity, oil content and mobility, and fracability); 3) synthesizes recent insights into shale oil occurrence, flow, and enrichment; 4) classifies lacustrine shale plays by source–reservoir configuration; 5) identifies geological sweet spots under different tectonic–sedimentary conditions; and 6) establishes corresponding enrichment models. Results show that freshwater lacustrine basins, with substantial terrigenous input, mainly develop siliceous–argillaceous shales or fine sandstone–siltstone lithofacies, whereas saline systems dominated by endogenous deposition favor carbonate-rich lithofacies. Organic matter enrichment is primarily controlled by high primary productivity in freshwater lakes and by selective preservation in saline lakes. Tailored techniques such as magnetic fluid volume measurement, portable X-ray fluorescence, and multistep pyrolysis improve the accuracy of key geological parameters. Organic matter content and kerogen–hydrocarbon interactions are the main controls on oil retention, while oil mobility is influenced by organic–inorganic coupling, pore structure, pressure gradients, and fluid properties. Fundamentally, enrichment mechanisms are similar in marine and lacustrine shales, differing mainly in their macroscopic expressions. Based on the source–reservoir configuration, lacustrine shale plays can be categorized into three types: (1) source-storage separation on meter-scale, (2) source-storage coexistence on centimeter- to millimeter-scale, and (3) source-storage integration on sub-millimeter-scale. Low–medium maturity integration plays in saline settings show the greatest exploration potential, while analogous plays in freshwater systems require high thermal maturity and favorable preservation conditions.
中国湖相页岩油系统:表征方法与资源成藏模型进展
湖相页岩油是中国常规油气的重要替代品,但与北美海相页岩油存在明显差异,在层间和层内均表现出较强的非均质性。这种可变性需要高密度采样,但传统的储层测试和采样方法可能效率低下,并且产生有偏差的结果。海相页岩勘探模式对湖相系统的适用性也不确定,缺乏统一的富集框架。本研究:1)研究了不同湖相页岩体系的岩相和有机相;2)综述了表征页岩四项关键性质(储气容量、含油量和流动性、可压性)的研究进展;3)综合最近对页岩油赋存、流动和富集的认识;4)通过源储配置对湖相页岩油气藏进行分类;5)识别不同构造-沉积条件下的地质甜点;6)建立相应的富集模型。结果表明,陆源输入较大的淡水湖盆主要发育硅泥质页岩或细砂粉岩相,而以内源沉积为主的咸水体系则有利于富碳酸盐岩相发育。有机质富集主要受淡水湖高初级生产力和咸水湖选择性保存的控制。磁流体体积测量、便携式x射线荧光和多步骤热解等量身定制的技术提高了关键地质参数的准确性。有机质含量和干酪根-烃相互作用是控制油潴留的主要因素,而油的流动性则受有机-无机耦合、孔隙结构、压力梯度和流体性质的影响。海相页岩与湖相页岩富集机制基本相似,主要区别在于宏观表现。根据源储配置,将湖相页岩油气藏划分为3种类型:(1)米尺度的源储分离型;(2)厘米-毫米尺度的源储共存型;(3)亚毫米尺度的源储一体化型。盐水环境中低成熟度一体化储层具有最大的勘探潜力,而淡水系统中类似储层则需要较高的热成熟度和良好的保存条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信