Dingxian He , Lei Jin , Shuangshuang Wang , Huahua Zhong , Hongxi Chen , Hongyu Zhou , Zhangyu Zou , Chongbo Zhao , Xiao Huan , Jie Song , Jianying Xi , Chong Yan , Sushan Luo
{"title":"Efgartigimod versus standard of care in new-Onset AChR subtype generalized myasthenia gravis: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Dingxian He , Lei Jin , Shuangshuang Wang , Huahua Zhong , Hongxi Chen , Hongyu Zhou , Zhangyu Zou , Chongbo Zhao , Xiao Huan , Jie Song , Jianying Xi , Chong Yan , Sushan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.clim.2025.110587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efgartigimod (EFG) is usually used to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) with long disease duration; the benefit in new-onset gMG remained unknown. This study included 87 new-onset gMG patients who received either oral steroid and immunosuppressive treatment (Conventional group, <em>n</em> = 30) or combined with EFG (EFG group, <em>n</em> = 57). The primary outcome was minimal symptom expression (MSE) responders, as denoted by a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) of 0 or 1 for over 4 weeks. At 12 weeks, the proportion of MSE responders was significantly higher in the EFG group (45.61 %, 26/57 vs. 13.33 %, 4/30, <em>p</em> = 0.0026). With the EFG group, patients with late-onset gMG had greater reductions in MG-ADL than those associated with thymoma (7.06 ± 3.25 vs. 4.96 ± 3.40, <em>p</em> = 0.040). EFG may be a promising treatment for rapid disease control in new-onset gMG, but future studies are still required to assess the cost-effectiveness and long-term safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10392,"journal":{"name":"Clinical immunology","volume":"281 ","pages":"Article 110587"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521661625001627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Efgartigimod (EFG) is usually used to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) with long disease duration; the benefit in new-onset gMG remained unknown. This study included 87 new-onset gMG patients who received either oral steroid and immunosuppressive treatment (Conventional group, n = 30) or combined with EFG (EFG group, n = 57). The primary outcome was minimal symptom expression (MSE) responders, as denoted by a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) of 0 or 1 for over 4 weeks. At 12 weeks, the proportion of MSE responders was significantly higher in the EFG group (45.61 %, 26/57 vs. 13.33 %, 4/30, p = 0.0026). With the EFG group, patients with late-onset gMG had greater reductions in MG-ADL than those associated with thymoma (7.06 ± 3.25 vs. 4.96 ± 3.40, p = 0.040). EFG may be a promising treatment for rapid disease control in new-onset gMG, but future studies are still required to assess the cost-effectiveness and long-term safety.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Immunology publishes original research delving into the molecular and cellular foundations of immunological diseases. Additionally, the journal includes reviews covering timely subjects in basic immunology, along with case reports and letters to the editor.