Walking in urban neighbourhoods − Insights from a mixed methods approach and citizen science in walkability research

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Noriko Otsuka , Janina Welsch , Katrin Lättman , Edward Prichard , Anna-Lena van der Vlugt , Jonas De Vos
{"title":"Walking in urban neighbourhoods − Insights from a mixed methods approach and citizen science in walkability research","authors":"Noriko Otsuka ,&nbsp;Janina Welsch ,&nbsp;Katrin Lättman ,&nbsp;Edward Prichard ,&nbsp;Anna-Lena van der Vlugt ,&nbsp;Jonas De Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Walkability has become a major topic in mobility and transport research over the last decade. To investigate the complex nature of walkability, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is often suggested. This paper introduces a mixed methods approach applied in a research project examining urban walkability at the neighbourhood scale in three European cities: Gothenburg, Dortmund and Genoa. Of the four methods used, our innovative citizen-science based Walking Route Assessment is the focus of this paper. The complementary roles of other methods (spatial modelling, household survey and walk-along interviews) are also discussed to reveal the benefits of mixed methods approaches for future walkability studies. The paper identified a set of prerequisites for improving perceived walkability. To enhance walking environments, more green space and place-making aspects should be taken into account, along with improving traffic safety and pedestrian environments through small interventions and the day-to-day maintenance of public spaces. The citizen-science led method played an important role in highlighting the areas for improving urban walkability, with photographic evidence. Cross-examination with the results from other methods provided deeper insights into people’s perceptions of their walking environment and routes on a neighbourhood scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walkability has become a major topic in mobility and transport research over the last decade. To investigate the complex nature of walkability, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is often suggested. This paper introduces a mixed methods approach applied in a research project examining urban walkability at the neighbourhood scale in three European cities: Gothenburg, Dortmund and Genoa. Of the four methods used, our innovative citizen-science based Walking Route Assessment is the focus of this paper. The complementary roles of other methods (spatial modelling, household survey and walk-along interviews) are also discussed to reveal the benefits of mixed methods approaches for future walkability studies. The paper identified a set of prerequisites for improving perceived walkability. To enhance walking environments, more green space and place-making aspects should be taken into account, along with improving traffic safety and pedestrian environments through small interventions and the day-to-day maintenance of public spaces. The citizen-science led method played an important role in highlighting the areas for improving urban walkability, with photographic evidence. Cross-examination with the results from other methods provided deeper insights into people’s perceptions of their walking environment and routes on a neighbourhood scale.
在城市街区散步-从步行性研究的混合方法方法和公民科学的见解
在过去的十年中,步行性已经成为交通研究的一个主要话题。为了研究可步行性的复杂性,通常建议采用定量和定性相结合的方法。本文介绍了在一个研究项目中应用的混合方法,该研究项目在三个欧洲城市:哥德堡、多特蒙德和热那亚的社区尺度上研究城市步行性。在这四种方法中,我们创新的基于公民科学的步行路线评估是本文的重点。本文还讨论了其他方法(空间建模、住户调查和步行访谈)的补充作用,以揭示混合方法对未来步行性研究的好处。该论文确定了一系列改善感知步行性的先决条件。为了改善步行环境,应该考虑更多的绿地和场所建设方面的问题,同时通过小的干预和公共空间的日常维护来改善交通安全和步行环境。以公民科学为主导的方法在突出改善城市步行性的区域方面发挥了重要作用,并有照片证据。与其他方法的结果进行交叉检验,可以更深入地了解人们对社区步行环境和路线的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信