Assessing the carbon reduction potential of high-performance concrete in urban construction

IF 5.8 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cai Wu , Peiyuan Zhou , Qing Li , Juan Li , Daopei Zhu
{"title":"Assessing the carbon reduction potential of high-performance concrete in urban construction","authors":"Cai Wu ,&nbsp;Peiyuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Juan Li ,&nbsp;Daopei Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.scp.2025.102170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the environmental and economic performance of four high-performance concretes (HPCs) in urban construction, aiming to support structural optimization and low-carbon development. The selected HPCs include Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC), Coarse Aggregate UHPC (UHPC-CA), Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC), and Ultra-High Performance Geopolymer Concrete (UHPGC). A life-cycle-based evaluation framework is established based on a real 11-story reinforced concrete frame column system. Four high-performance concrete replacement schemes are assessed under equivalent load-bearing requirements to compare carbon emissions, material costs, and structural performance from material production to on-site construction. Results show that UHPC-CA reduces emissions by 17 % and cost by 8 %, while maintaining mechanical capacity. UHPFRC improves axial capacity by 142.5 % with a moderate 8 % cost increase and an overall emission reduction. UHPGC achieves the highest carbon savings, reducing emissions by 35.3 % through the use of a cement-free geopolymer binder. This study is among the first to combine environmental, economic, and structural indicators in a comparative assessment of multiple HPCs within realistic construction scenarios. It also incorporates regional emission and cost data from five major Chinese cities, enhancing the practical relevance of the results. The findings provide valuable insights for the promotion of green concrete technologies and the implementation of sustainable urban building strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22138,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 102170"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352554125002682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental and economic performance of four high-performance concretes (HPCs) in urban construction, aiming to support structural optimization and low-carbon development. The selected HPCs include Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC), Coarse Aggregate UHPC (UHPC-CA), Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC), and Ultra-High Performance Geopolymer Concrete (UHPGC). A life-cycle-based evaluation framework is established based on a real 11-story reinforced concrete frame column system. Four high-performance concrete replacement schemes are assessed under equivalent load-bearing requirements to compare carbon emissions, material costs, and structural performance from material production to on-site construction. Results show that UHPC-CA reduces emissions by 17 % and cost by 8 %, while maintaining mechanical capacity. UHPFRC improves axial capacity by 142.5 % with a moderate 8 % cost increase and an overall emission reduction. UHPGC achieves the highest carbon savings, reducing emissions by 35.3 % through the use of a cement-free geopolymer binder. This study is among the first to combine environmental, economic, and structural indicators in a comparative assessment of multiple HPCs within realistic construction scenarios. It also incorporates regional emission and cost data from five major Chinese cities, enhancing the practical relevance of the results. The findings provide valuable insights for the promotion of green concrete technologies and the implementation of sustainable urban building strategies.

Abstract Image

评估高性能混凝土在城市建设中的碳减排潜力
本研究评估了四种高性能混凝土在城市建设中的环境和经济性能,旨在支持结构优化和低碳发展。选定的高性能混凝土包括超高性能混凝土(UHPC)、粗骨料超高性能混凝土(UHPC- ca)、超高性能纤维增强混凝土(UHPFRC)和超高性能地聚合物混凝土(UHPGC)。以实际的11层钢筋混凝土框架柱体系为基础,建立了基于生命周期的评价框架。在等效的承重要求下,对四种高性能混凝土替代方案进行了评估,以比较从材料生产到现场施工的碳排放、材料成本和结构性能。结果表明,在保持机械容量的同时,UHPC-CA减少了17%的排放量和8%的成本。UHPFRC提高了142.5%的轴向容量,适度增加了8%的成本,并减少了总体排放量。UHPGC实现了最高的碳节约,通过使用无水泥地聚合物粘合剂减少了35.3%的排放量。这项研究首次将环境、经济和结构指标结合起来,对现实建设场景中的多个高性能混凝土进行比较评估。它还纳入了中国五个主要城市的区域排放和成本数据,增强了结果的实际相关性。研究结果为绿色混凝土技术的推广和可持续城市建设战略的实施提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy publishes research that is related to chemistry, pharmacy and sustainability science in a forward oriented manner. It provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the intersection and overlap of chemistry and pharmacy on the one hand and sustainability on the other hand. This includes contributions related to increasing sustainability of chemistry and pharmaceutical science and industries itself as well as their products in relation to the contribution of these to sustainability itself. As an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal it addresses all sustainability related issues along the life cycle of chemical and pharmaceutical products form resource related topics until the end of life of products. This includes not only natural science based approaches and issues but also from humanities, social science and economics as far as they are dealing with sustainability related to chemistry and pharmacy. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy aims at bridging between disciplines as well as developing and developed countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信