Controlling magnetite heterogeneous nucleation for enhanced iron removal from zinc leachate via magnetic separation

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Jiahui Wu , Xiaole Wang , Meiqing Shi , Wenchao Zhang , Qingwei Wang , Yunyan Wang , Yong Ke , Xu Yan , Liyuan Chai
{"title":"Controlling magnetite heterogeneous nucleation for enhanced iron removal from zinc leachate via magnetic separation","authors":"Jiahui Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaole Wang ,&nbsp;Meiqing Shi ,&nbsp;Wenchao Zhang ,&nbsp;Qingwei Wang ,&nbsp;Yunyan Wang ,&nbsp;Yong Ke ,&nbsp;Xu Yan ,&nbsp;Liyuan Chai","doi":"10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The separation of Fe from zinc leachate is a critical challenge in zinc hydrometallurgy. While current Fe removal methods (e.g., jarosite and goethite precipitation) generate hazardous low-iron wastes, this study presents a novel approach through magnetite precipitation, which offers high Fe content (∼72 %) and strong ferromagnetism for effective impurity separation. We systematically evaluated three magnetite precipitation methods, analyzing their iron-removal products, magnetic separation performance, and crystallization mechanisms. Our investigation revealed critical limitations of two conventional approaches: partial oxidation yields large, strongly magnetic magnetite particles but suffers from high nucleation barriers (∼15,000 k<sub>B</sub>T) that favor goethite impurities, while coprecipitation exhibits lower nucleation barriers (∼1000 k<sub>B</sub>T) but produces ultrafine, weakly magnetic particles that compromise separation efficiency. Building upon our previously established slow-dropping methodology, we demonstrated that this nucleation-controlled approach enables in situ formation of magnetite seeds, shifting the nucleation mechanism from homogeneous to heterogeneous. This innovative approach achieves dual benefits: reduced nucleation barriers and promoted growth of micrometer-sized magnetite mesocrystals. The resulting product demonstrates remarkable improvements, reaching 104.12 emu/g, substantially higher than that achieved by partial oxidation (77.75 emu/g) and coprecipitation (25.12 emu/g). The impurity removal efficiency reached 70 % for Pb and 81 % for Ca, significantly outperforming conventional methods. These findings extend the application of our slow-dropping protocol to investigate solid–solid separation between magnetite and impurities, thereby demonstrating its broader potential for sustainable resource recovery applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18594,"journal":{"name":"Minerals Engineering","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 109737"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687525005655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The separation of Fe from zinc leachate is a critical challenge in zinc hydrometallurgy. While current Fe removal methods (e.g., jarosite and goethite precipitation) generate hazardous low-iron wastes, this study presents a novel approach through magnetite precipitation, which offers high Fe content (∼72 %) and strong ferromagnetism for effective impurity separation. We systematically evaluated three magnetite precipitation methods, analyzing their iron-removal products, magnetic separation performance, and crystallization mechanisms. Our investigation revealed critical limitations of two conventional approaches: partial oxidation yields large, strongly magnetic magnetite particles but suffers from high nucleation barriers (∼15,000 kBT) that favor goethite impurities, while coprecipitation exhibits lower nucleation barriers (∼1000 kBT) but produces ultrafine, weakly magnetic particles that compromise separation efficiency. Building upon our previously established slow-dropping methodology, we demonstrated that this nucleation-controlled approach enables in situ formation of magnetite seeds, shifting the nucleation mechanism from homogeneous to heterogeneous. This innovative approach achieves dual benefits: reduced nucleation barriers and promoted growth of micrometer-sized magnetite mesocrystals. The resulting product demonstrates remarkable improvements, reaching 104.12 emu/g, substantially higher than that achieved by partial oxidation (77.75 emu/g) and coprecipitation (25.12 emu/g). The impurity removal efficiency reached 70 % for Pb and 81 % for Ca, significantly outperforming conventional methods. These findings extend the application of our slow-dropping protocol to investigate solid–solid separation between magnetite and impurities, thereby demonstrating its broader potential for sustainable resource recovery applications.
控制磁铁矿非均相成核对锌浸出液磁选除铁效果的影响
锌浸出液中铁的分离是湿法炼锌的关键问题。虽然目前的除铁方法(如黄钾铁矾和针铁矿沉淀)会产生危险的低铁废物,但本研究提出了一种通过磁铁矿沉淀的新方法,该方法具有高铁含量(~ 72%)和强铁磁性,可有效分离杂质。我们系统地评价了三种磁铁矿沉淀方法,分析了它们的除铁产物、磁选性能和结晶机理。我们的研究揭示了两种传统方法的关键局限性:部分氧化产生大的,强磁性的磁铁矿颗粒,但具有高成核屏障(~ 15,000 kBT),有利于针铁矿杂质,而共沉淀表现出较低的成核屏障(~ 1000 kBT),但产生超细的,弱磁性颗粒,影响分离效率。在我们之前建立的缓慢下降方法的基础上,我们证明了这种控制成核的方法能够原位形成磁铁矿种子,将成核机制从均匀转变为非均匀。这种创新的方法实现了双重好处:减少了成核障碍,促进了微米级磁铁矿介晶的生长。所得产物表现出显著的改善,达到104.12 emu/g,大大高于部分氧化(77.75 emu/g)和共沉淀(25.12 emu/g)的结果。对Pb和Ca的去除率分别达到70%和81%,明显优于常规方法。这些发现扩展了我们的慢滴方案的应用,以研究磁铁矿和杂质之间的固体-固体分离,从而展示了其在可持续资源回收应用中的更广泛潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerals Engineering
Minerals Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
519
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is to provide for the rapid publication of topical papers featuring the latest developments in the allied fields of mineral processing and extractive metallurgy. Its wide ranging coverage of research and practical (operating) topics includes physical separation methods, such as comminution, flotation concentration and dewatering, chemical methods such as bio-, hydro-, and electro-metallurgy, analytical techniques, process control, simulation and instrumentation, and mineralogical aspects of processing. Environmental issues, particularly those pertaining to sustainable development, will also be strongly covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信