Children Cheat to Return a Favor

IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Laura Tietz, Felix Warneken, Sebastian Grueneisen
{"title":"Children Cheat to Return a Favor","authors":"Laura Tietz,&nbsp;Felix Warneken,&nbsp;Sebastian Grueneisen","doi":"10.1111/desc.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Reciprocity is a cornerstone of human cooperation, motivating individuals to assist each other at a personal cost, resulting in mutual long-term benefits. However, reciprocity can conflict with honesty norms, such as when returning favors to previous benefactors requires individuals to act dishonestly. The resulting moral dilemmas are difficult to navigate even for adults, yet developmental research has almost exclusively focused on the prosocial aspects of reciprocity. To explore the developmental origins of this conflict, we investigated 5- to 8-year-old children's evaluations of and engagement in prosocial cheating to return a favor. In Study 1, children evaluated protagonists in hypothetical scenarios who cheated to benefit others whom they did or did not owe a favor. Across ages, children condemned cheating and favored honesty over reciprocity from a third-party perspective. In Study 2, children participated in two games in which they had the opportunity to cheat (by peeking behind a barrier or misreporting die-rolling outcomes, respectively) to win prizes for an adult partner who had either previously shared a valued resource with them (reciprocity condition) or not (control condition). Across ages, children were more likely to benefit a partner by cheating when they owed them a favor than when they did not owe them a favor. These findings suggest that children as young as 5 are willing to disregard honesty in favor of reciprocating prosocial acts, highlighting the developmental origins of a tension between interpersonal obligations and moral norms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>In two studies, we investigated 5- to 8-year-old children's evaluations of and engagement in prosocial cheating and prosocial cheating to return a favor.</li>\n \n <li>From a third-party perspective, children strongly endorsed rule compliance and condemned cheating, even when it helped someone else.</li>\n \n <li>When acting themselves, children cheated to benefit a partner, especially when the partner had previously done them a favor.</li>\n \n <li>The results reveal that reciprocity can override honesty norms in early childhood, shaping moral decision-making.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reciprocity is a cornerstone of human cooperation, motivating individuals to assist each other at a personal cost, resulting in mutual long-term benefits. However, reciprocity can conflict with honesty norms, such as when returning favors to previous benefactors requires individuals to act dishonestly. The resulting moral dilemmas are difficult to navigate even for adults, yet developmental research has almost exclusively focused on the prosocial aspects of reciprocity. To explore the developmental origins of this conflict, we investigated 5- to 8-year-old children's evaluations of and engagement in prosocial cheating to return a favor. In Study 1, children evaluated protagonists in hypothetical scenarios who cheated to benefit others whom they did or did not owe a favor. Across ages, children condemned cheating and favored honesty over reciprocity from a third-party perspective. In Study 2, children participated in two games in which they had the opportunity to cheat (by peeking behind a barrier or misreporting die-rolling outcomes, respectively) to win prizes for an adult partner who had either previously shared a valued resource with them (reciprocity condition) or not (control condition). Across ages, children were more likely to benefit a partner by cheating when they owed them a favor than when they did not owe them a favor. These findings suggest that children as young as 5 are willing to disregard honesty in favor of reciprocating prosocial acts, highlighting the developmental origins of a tension between interpersonal obligations and moral norms.

Summary

  • In two studies, we investigated 5- to 8-year-old children's evaluations of and engagement in prosocial cheating and prosocial cheating to return a favor.
  • From a third-party perspective, children strongly endorsed rule compliance and condemned cheating, even when it helped someone else.
  • When acting themselves, children cheated to benefit a partner, especially when the partner had previously done them a favor.
  • The results reveal that reciprocity can override honesty norms in early childhood, shaping moral decision-making.

Abstract Image

孩子们通过欺骗来回报别人
互惠是人类合作的基石,它激励个人在付出个人代价的情况下相互帮助,从而实现双方的长期利益。然而,互惠可能与诚实准则相冲突,例如,当回报以前的恩人时,个人就会表现得不诚实。由此产生的道德困境即使对成年人来说也很难解决,然而发展研究几乎只关注互惠的亲社会方面。为了探讨这种冲突的发展根源,我们调查了5- 8岁儿童对亲社会欺骗行为的评价和参与情况。在研究1中,孩子们在假设的场景中评估主人公,他们会欺骗别人,以帮助他们欠或不欠别人的人。各个年龄段的孩子都谴责作弊,从第三方的角度来看,他们更喜欢诚实,而不是互惠。在研究2中,孩子们参加了两个游戏,在这些游戏中,他们有机会作弊(分别通过偷看屏障后面或谎报掷骰子结果),为之前与他们分享过有价值资源(互惠条件)或没有分享过有价值资源(控制条件)的成年伴侣赢得奖品。纵观各个年龄段,孩子们更有可能在欠父母人情的时候欺骗父母,而不是不欠父母人情的时候。这些发现表明,5岁的孩子就愿意为了回报亲社会行为而忽视诚实,这突出了人际义务和道德规范之间紧张关系的发展起源。在两项研究中,我们调查了5 ~ 8岁儿童对亲社会欺骗和亲社会欺骗的评价和参与。从第三方的角度来看,孩子们强烈支持遵守规则,谴责作弊,即使作弊帮助了别人。当孩子们表现自己时,他们会为了让伴侣受益而作弊,尤其是当伴侣之前帮过他们的时候。结果表明,互惠可以在儿童早期超越诚实规范,塑造道德决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信