Children Demand an Equal Share of Worthless Objects

IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Colin Jacobs, Sebastian Grueneisen, Harriet Over, Jan M. Engelmann
{"title":"Children Demand an Equal Share of Worthless Objects","authors":"Colin Jacobs,&nbsp;Sebastian Grueneisen,&nbsp;Harriet Over,&nbsp;Jan M. Engelmann","doi":"10.1111/desc.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>A key milestone in the development of fairness is <i>disadvantageous inequity aversion</i>: a willingness to sacrifice valuable rewards to avoid receiving less than a peer. The equal respect hypothesis suggests that, in addition to material concerns, children are also motivated to reject disadvantageous inequity due to interpersonal concerns. To test this prediction, we investigated how young children (<i>N</i> = 184, ages 4–7) respond to receiving less of the objects they explicitly do not desire across three pre-registered experiments. We found that, from 4 years old, children are averse to receiving unequal offers of undesirable objects (Experiment 1) and are even willing to sacrifice a high-value reward to reject inequality of undesirable objects (Experiment 2). Children are less likely to refuse unequal offers of undesirable objects when the distributor provides a reason for giving them less (Experiment 3). Together, these studies demonstrate that interpersonal concerns play a key role in motivating the costly rejection of inequity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>4–7-year-olds reject unequal allocations of worthless objects despite not liking them (Experiment 1).</li>\n \n <li>Children even sacrifice a high-value reward to reject unequal allocations of worthless objects (Experiment 2).</li>\n \n <li>Children reject unequal allocations less often when given a reason for the unequal distribution by the distributor (Experiment 3).</li>\n \n <li>This suggests that interpersonal concerns play a key role in motivating the costly rejection of inequity, independent of material consequences.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key milestone in the development of fairness is disadvantageous inequity aversion: a willingness to sacrifice valuable rewards to avoid receiving less than a peer. The equal respect hypothesis suggests that, in addition to material concerns, children are also motivated to reject disadvantageous inequity due to interpersonal concerns. To test this prediction, we investigated how young children (N = 184, ages 4–7) respond to receiving less of the objects they explicitly do not desire across three pre-registered experiments. We found that, from 4 years old, children are averse to receiving unequal offers of undesirable objects (Experiment 1) and are even willing to sacrifice a high-value reward to reject inequality of undesirable objects (Experiment 2). Children are less likely to refuse unequal offers of undesirable objects when the distributor provides a reason for giving them less (Experiment 3). Together, these studies demonstrate that interpersonal concerns play a key role in motivating the costly rejection of inequity.

Summary

  • 4–7-year-olds reject unequal allocations of worthless objects despite not liking them (Experiment 1).
  • Children even sacrifice a high-value reward to reject unequal allocations of worthless objects (Experiment 2).
  • Children reject unequal allocations less often when given a reason for the unequal distribution by the distributor (Experiment 3).
  • This suggests that interpersonal concerns play a key role in motivating the costly rejection of inequity, independent of material consequences.
孩子们要求平分无用物品
公平发展的一个关键里程碑是不利的不平等厌恶:愿意牺牲有价值的奖励以避免得到比同伴少的东西。平等尊重假说认为,除了物质上的考虑,儿童也会因为人际关系的考虑而拒绝不利的不平等。为了验证这一预测,我们调查了幼儿(N = 184,年龄4-7岁)在三个预先注册的实验中收到他们明确不想要的更少的物体时的反应。我们发现,从4岁开始,孩子们就不愿意接受不平等的不受欢迎的物体(实验1),甚至愿意牺牲高价值的奖励来拒绝不受欢迎的物体(实验2)。当分发者提供一个少给他们的理由时,孩子们不太可能拒绝不平等的不受欢迎的物品。综上所述,这些研究表明,人际关系在促使人们付出高昂代价拒绝不平等的过程中发挥了关键作用。4 - 7岁的孩子拒绝分配不平等的没有价值的东西,尽管他们不喜欢它们(实验1)。孩子们甚至会牺牲高价值的奖励来拒绝不平等分配的无价值物品(实验2)。当分配者给出不平等分配的原因时,孩子们拒绝不平等分配的频率会降低(实验3)。这表明,与物质后果无关,人际关系在促使人们拒绝不平等的代价高昂的过程中发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信